Advertisement

The Wetland Book pp 2119-2125 | Cite as

Economic Valuation of Wetlands: Overview

  • Ritesh Kumar
Reference work entry

Abstract

The continued loss and degradation of wetlands and the role of economic drivers therein, urgently call for communicating the diverse values of wetlands, and the consequences of loss of vital ecosystem services, in the language of the world’s dominant economic and ecological paradigms. Economic valuation helps bridge this communication gap by enabling expression of the impact of public and private decisions on ecosystem service values in comparable metrics. A fuller and meaningful application of economic valuation assessments merits can be enabled by understanding of why valuation is needed, whose and what values are important, how to derive values and ultimately ensure integration in decision making processes. As akin to various assessment tools, economic valuation is also associated with uncertainty of various forms and levels, which need to be understood for a meaningful application. Valuation in general, and economic valuation in particular, is an evolving field, and needs to be continually enriched with better understanding of ecosystem functioning and plurality of values.

Keywords

Values Preferences Uncertainty Benefit transfer Scaling 

References

  1. Akter S, Bennett J, Akhter S. Preference uncertainty in contingent valuation. Ecol Econ. 2008;67:345–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbier EB, Baumgartner S, Chopra K, Costello C, Duraiappah A, Hassan R, Kinzig A, Lehman M, Pascual U, Polasky S, Perrings C. The valuation of ecosystem services. In: Naeem S, Bunker D, Hector A, Loreau M, Perrings C, editors. Biodiversity conservation. In: Kareiva PK, Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Tallis H, Polasky S, editors. The theory and practice of ecosystem service valuation in conservation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bromley DW, Paavola J. Economics, ethics and environmental policy. In: Bromley DW, Paavola J, editors. Economics, ethics, and environmental policy: contested choices. Malden: Blackwell; 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Costanza R. Embodied energy and economic valuation. Science. 1980;210:1219–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Costanza R, editor. Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press; 1991.Google Scholar
  6. De Groot RS, Stuip MAM, Finlayson CM, Davidson N. Valuing wetlands: guidance for valuing the benefits derived from wetland ecosystem services, Ramsar technical report No. 3/CBD technical series No. 27. Gland/Montreal: Ramsar Convention Secretariat/Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity; 2006.Google Scholar
  7. Farber SC, Costanza R, Wilson MA. Economics and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol Econ. 2002;41:375–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Finlayson CM, Davidson N, Pritchard D, Milton GR, MacKay H. The Ramsar convention and ecosystem based approaches to wise use and sustainable development of wetlands. J Int Wildl Law Policy. 2011;14:176–98.Google Scholar
  9. Gren IM, Folke C, Turner RK, Bateman I. Primary and secondary values of wetland ecosystems. Environ Res Econ. 1994;4:55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Holling CS. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 1973;4:1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacobs M. Environmental valuation, deliberative democracy and public decision-making. In: Foster J, editor. Valuing nature? Economics, ethics and environment. London: Routledge; 1997. p. 211–31.Google Scholar
  12. Kontoleon A, Macrory R, Swanson T. Individual preference based values and environmental decision-making: should valuation have its day in court? J Res Law Econ. 2002;20:179–216.Google Scholar
  13. McCauley DJ. Selling out on nature. Nature. 2006;443:27–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. MEA. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  15. Mooney H, Cropper A, Reid W. Confronting the human dilemma: how can ecosystems provide sustainable services to benefit society? Nature. 2005;434:561–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. North DC. Economic performance through time. Am Econ Rev. 1994;8:359–68.Google Scholar
  17. Odum HT. Economic impacts brought about by alterations to freshwater flow. In: Urban ER, Malloy L, editors. Improving interactions between coastal science and policy. Proceedings of the Gulf of Mexico Symposium, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996. p. 239–54.Google Scholar
  18. Ostrom E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science. 2009;325:419–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ready RC, Whitehead JC, Blomquist GC. Contingent valuation when respondents are ambivalent. J Environ Econ Manag. 1995;29:181–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sagoff M. Should preferences count? Land Econ. 1994;70:127–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sagoff M. The quantification and valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ. 2011;70:497–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith VK, Van Houtveen G, Pattanayaak SK. Benefit transfer via preference calibration: “Prudential algebra” for policy. Land Econ. 2002;78:132–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Spash C, Vatn A. Transferring environmental value estimates: issues and alternatives. Ecol Econ. 2006;60:379–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. TEEB. In: Kumar P, editor. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. Abingdon: Routledge; 2012.Google Scholar
  25. Turner KT, Paavola J, Cooper P, Farber S, Jessamy V, Georgiu S. Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecol Econ. 2003;46:493–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Walker BH, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig AP. Resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc. 2004;9:5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zavestoski S. Constructing and maintaining ecological identities: the strategies of deep ecologists. In: Clayton S, Opotow S, editors. Identity and the natural environment: the psychological significance of nature. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2004. p. 297–316.Google Scholar
  28. Zografos C, Paavola J. Critical perspectives on human action and deliberative ecological economics. Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 146–66.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wetlands International South AsiaNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations