Skip to main content

Wetland Assessment Methods: Biological Assessment

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Wetland Book
  • 285 Accesses

Abstract

The central purpose of biological wetland assessment is the quantitative and qualitative description and enumeration of the species, communities, and habitats present. To achieve this, often a basic inventory is needed of the wetland attributes (physical properties, species composition, and structure) and of soil, water chemistry, and hydrological characteristics. Specific aims may be: estimating the nature conservation value at a regional, national, or international scale; determining the need for protective measures; determining the contribution of the wetland to ecosystem services and the scope for exploitation; informing management and restoration strategies; or a comparison to reference conditions. Biological assessment can make use of a wide range of techniques including broad habitat mapping (e.g., terrestrial survey, aerial photography, satellite imagery), detailed community mapping, quadrat and/or transect surveys and phytosociological analysis, population counts of target species (e.g., as indicators of biological integrity or for conservation goals), fixed-point photography, sub-aqua diving surveys, remotely controlled cameras, structured grapnel surveys, and integrated survey systems. Nature conservation agencies have developed rapid assessment methods, which express the biological integrity of the wetland in metrics (indicators) that may support management decisions but can also be used to communicate information about the status of wetlands to the general public. A main future challenge is to develop consistency in assessment approaches and to ensure the availability of basic information, which will improve the comparability of assessment results and their application in policy making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Danielson TJ. Methods for evaluating wetland condition: #1 introduction to wetland biological assessment. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies CE, Moss D, Hill MO. EUNIS habitat classification revised 2004, Report to the European Topic Centre on Nature Protection and Biodiversity. Brussels: European Environment Agency; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doniţă N, Popescu A, Paucă-Comănescu M, Mihăilescu S, BiriÅŸ I-A. Habitatele din România. BucureÅŸti: Editura Tehnică Silvică; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural England. SSSI condition assessment: a guide for owners and occupiers. Peterborough: Natural England; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural England. Higher level stewardship: farm environment plan (FEP) manual. 3rd ed. Peterborough: Natural England; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. Interpretation manual of European Union habitats – EUR28. Brussels: DG Environment – Nature and Biodiversity; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill D, Fasham M, Tucker G, Shewry M, Shaw P. Handbook of biodiversity methods: survey, evaluation and monitoring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • JNCC. Common standards monitoring guidance for lowland wetlands habitats. Peterborough: Joint Nature Conservation Committee; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR, Dudley DR. Ecological perspectives on water quality goals. Environ Manag. 1981;5:55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keddy PA. Wetland ecology: principles and conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRA. River corridor surveys: methods and procedures, NRA conservation technical handbook No. 1. Bristol: National Rivers Authority; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell JS. British plant communities, 5 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991–2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ, editor. Ecological census techniques: a handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treweek J. Ecological impact assessment. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright JF, Moss D, Clarke RT, Furse MT. Biological assessment of river quality using the new version of RIVPACS (RIVPACS III). In: Boon PJ, Howell DL, editors. Freshwater quality: defining the indefinable? Edinburgh: The Stationery Office; 1997. p. 102–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Owen Mountford .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mountford, J.O. (2018). Wetland Assessment Methods: Biological Assessment. In: Finlayson, C.M., et al. The Wetland Book. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9659-3_287

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics