Economics of Wetland Conservation Case Study: “Systemic Solutions” for Integrated Water Management

Reference work entry

Abstract

Unintended consequences arising from narrow consideration of outputs from water and environmental management technologies are of increasing concern, including, for example, climate-active gases and solid waste generated by increasing intensity of traditional wastewater treatment. Formerly overlooked environmental and financial costs, as well as social concerns along supply chains and local disruption due to vehicle movements, are also giving cause for concern. Broader consideration of inputs and outputs highlights the need for low-input solutions that optimize outcomes across multiple ecosystem services. These “systemic solutions” are defined as “…low-input technologies using natural processes to optimise benefits across the spectrum of ecosystem services and their beneficiaries.”

Keywords

Ecosystem services constructed wetlands integrated constructed wetlands water quality biodiversity landscape fit life cycle costs wastewater treatment 

References

  1. Boets P, Michels E, Meers E, Lock K, Tack FMG. Integrated constructed wetlands (ICW): ecological development in constructed wetlands for manure treatment. Wetlands. 2011;31:763–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chan KMA, Shaw MR, Cameron DR, Underwood EC, Daily GC. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(11):2138–52.Google Scholar
  3. Doody D, Harrington R, Johnson M, Hofman O, McEntee D. Sewerage treatment in an integrated constructed wetland. Munic Eng. 2009;162:199–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Everard M. Why does ‘good ecological status’ matter? Water Environ J. 2011;26(2):165–74. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2011.00273.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Everard M, Harrington R, McInnes RJ. Facilitating implementation of landscape-scale water management: the integrated constructed wetland concept. Eco Ser. 2012;2:27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Everard M, McInnes RJ. Systemic solutions for multi-benefit water and environmental management. Sci Total Environ. 2013;461–62:170–179. ISSN:0048-9697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Everard M, Moggridge HL. Rediscovering the value of urban rivers. Urban Eco. 2012;15(2):293–314. doi:10.1007/s11252-011-0174-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greenway M. The role of constructed wetlands in secondary effluent treatment and water reuse in subtropical and arid Australia. Ecol Eng. 2005;25:501–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harrington R, McInnes RJ. Integrated Constructed Wetlands (ICW) for livestock wastewater management. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(22):5498–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harrington R, Carroll P, Cook S, Harrington C, Scholz M, McInnes RJ. Integrated constructed wetlands: water management as a land-use issue, implementing the ‘ecosystem approach’. Water Sci Technol. 2011;63(12):2929–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Knight RL. Wildlife habitat and public use benefits of treatment wetlands. Water Sci Technol. 1997;35(5):35–44.Google Scholar
  12. McInnes RJ. Managing wetlands for multifunctional benefits. In: Le Page B, editor. Wetlands: integrating multidisciplinary concepts. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 205–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nuttall PM, Boon AG, Rowell MR. Review of the design and management of constructed wetlands. London: CIRIA Report 180. 1997.Google Scholar
  14. Revitt DM, Worrall P, Brewer D. The integration of constructed wetlands into a treatment system for airport runoff. Water Sci Technol. 2001;44:469–76.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Vymazal J. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Water. 2010;2(3):530–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vymazal J. Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: five decades of experience. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:61–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vymazal J, Kröpfelová L. Wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands with horizontal sub-surface flow. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Worrall P, Peberdy KJ, Millett MC. Constructed wetlands and nature conservation. Water Sci Technol. 1995;3:205–13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Water Security Network, University of the West of EnglandBristolUK
  2. 2.RM Wetlands and Environment LtdLittleworth, OxfordshireUK

Personalised recommendations