Skip to main content

Mediated Well-Being from the Perspective of Media and Communication Studies

  • Reference work entry
  • 728 Accesses

Abstract

This exploration of the relationship between media and children, with well-being at the centre, considers what theories and major scientific research perspectives have prevailed in the field as well as the assumptions, evidence and results over time. It posits the notion of “mediated well-being” and follows its evolution from early media studies (with a strong sociological component) to current multidisciplinary communication studies applied to complex cross and mixed media such as the Internet and its interactive platforms (with a strong psychological and cognitive component).

Such a complex analysis is conducted by considering three types of controversies around well-being in the media that have helped build the field of communication studies itself: effects versus uses, risk versus play, protection versus participation. These considerations lead to an examination of the main methodological approaches adopted in the area and outline a research agenda for further exploration of the relation between media and well-being. This synthetic analysis suggests that the issue of children’s well-being has been central to the construction of the field of media studies in its origins, that content issues have been central to policymaking, and that children should be more incorporated into the research of what happens in the current situation of a two-way shuttle screen, where a lot of transmedia activities are generated by them and for them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   3,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aarseth, E. (2003). Playing research: Methodological approaches to game analysis. Proceedings of the digital Arts & culture conference, Melbourne. Available online at www.spilforskning.dk./gameapproaches2.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Allard, L., & Blondeau, L. (2007). Culture numérique, cultures expressives. Médiamorphoses, 21, 18–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). The effects of media violence on society. Science, 295, 2377–2379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Blanchard, E. B., & Ritter, B. (1969). The relative efficacy of desensitization and modeling approaches for inducing behavioral, affective and attitudinal changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 173–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbero, J. M. (1993). Communication, culture and hegemony: From media to mediations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid fear. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992, 1st published 1986). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A. (2008). The child indicators movement: Past, present, and future. Child Indicator Research, 1, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh, A., & George, R. M. (Eds.). (2006). Indicators of children’s well-being: Understanding their role, usage and policy influence. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L. W. (2008). Changing citizenship in the digital age. In W. L. Bennett (Ed.), Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth (pp. 1–24). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, C. R., & Chaffee, S. H. (Eds.). (1987). Handbook of communication science. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1971). Social problems as collective behavior. Social Problems, 18(3), 298–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumler, J. G., & Katz, E. (1974). The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovill, M., & Livingstone, S. (2001). Bedroom culture and the privatization of media use. In S. Livingstone & M. Bovill (Eds.), Children and their changing media environment: A European comparative study (pp. 179–200). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. (2002). Mass media influences on sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 39(22), 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., & L’Engle, K. (2009). X-rated: sexual attitudes and behaviors associated with U.S. Early adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit media. Communication Research, 36, 129–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2000a). After the death of childhood: Growing up in the age of electronic media. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2000b). The making of citizens: Young people, news and politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2002). Children and new media. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas, F. (2008). Children’s Cultures and new technologies: A gap between generations? some reflections from the Spanish context. In A. James & A. L. James (Eds.), European childhoods: Cultures, politics and participation (pp. 61–82). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1973). Folk devils and moral panics. St Albans: Paladin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critcher, C. (2003). Moral panics and the media. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czitrom, D. (1982). Media and the American mind. Durham: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, P., & Olsson, T. (2007). Young activists, political horizons and the internet: Adapting the net to one’s purposes. In B. D. Loader (Ed.), Young citizens in the digital age political engagement, young people and new media (pp. 68–81). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Singly, F. (Ed.). (2004). Enfants-adultes: Vers une égalité de statuts? Paris: Universalis.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Singly, F. (2007). Sociologie de la famille contemporaine. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eron, L. D., & Huesmann, L. R. (1980). Adolescent aggression and television. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 347, 319–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, J. (1992). The cultural economy of fandom. In L. Lewis (Ed.), The adoring audience. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2004). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 420–434). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frau-Meigs, D. (2004). La réglementation des contenus à la télévision: enjeux et limites des solutions actuelles. Questions de communication, hors série “Télévision, justice, regulation”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frau-Meigs, D. (2006). Media regulation, self-regulation and education: Debunking some myths and retooling some working paradigms. In C. Von Feilitzen (Ed.), Regulation, awareness, empowerment. Young people and harmful media content in the digital age (pp. 83–100). Nordicom: Goteborg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frau-Meigs, D. (2007). Qui a détourné le 11 septembre? Information et démocratie aux Etats-Unis. Bruxelles et Paris: De Boeck Université/INA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frau-Meigs, D., & Jehel, S. (2003). Médias, Jeunes, Violence. Economica: Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frau-Meigs, D. (2011a). Penser la société de l’écran. Paris: Presses de la Sorbonne nouvelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frau-Meigs, D. (2011b). Socialisation des jeunes et éducation aux médias. Toulouse: Eres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frau-Meigs, D. (2011c). Media matters in the cultural contradictions of the information society. Towards a human-rights based governance. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frau-Meigs, D., & Jehel, S. (1997). Les écrans de la violence. Enjeux économiques et responsabilités sociales. Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frau-Meigs, D., & Meigs, D. J. (2009). Browser games and online safety. Global Media Journal

    Google Scholar 

  • Frau-Meigs, D., & Torrent, J. (Eds.). (2009). Mapping media education policies worldwide. New York: UN Alliance of Civilisations and UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description. The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G. (1986). The symbolic context of action and communication. In R. L. Rosnow & M. Georgoudi (Eds.), Contextualism and understanding in behavioral science (pp. 251–268). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television. The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26, 173–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1980). The ‘mainstreaming’ of America: Violence profile no. 11. Journal of Communication, 30(3), 10–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1986). Living with television: The dynamics of the cultivation process. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Perspectives on media effects (pp. 17–40). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrig, R. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, S., Booker, A., & McDermott, M. (2008). Mixing the digital, social, and cultural: Learning, identity, and agency in youth participation. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digital media (pp. 185–206). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonnet, J. (2003). Les médias et la curiosité du monde. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P. M. (2009). Technology and informal education: What is taught, what is learned. Science, 323, 69–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, P. M., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2012). Digital media and youth: Games, internet and development. In D. Singer & J. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (2nd ed., pp. 75–96). London/New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, E. F., Juvonen, J., & Gable, S. L. (2002). Internet use and well-being in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (1978). Policing the crisis: Mugging, the state and law and order. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1980). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 128–138). London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodkinson, P. (2007). Youth cultures: A critical outline of key debates. In P. Hodkinson & W. Deicke (Eds.), Youth culture: Scenes, subcultures and tribes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntemann, N., & Morgan, M. (2012). Mass media and identity development. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston, A. C., Wartella, E., & Donnerstein, E. (1998). Measuring the effects of sexual content in the media. Menlo Park: Kaiser Family Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquinot, G. (Ed.). (2002). Les jeunes et les médias. Perspectives de recherche dans le monde. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehel, S. (2010). Parents, médias: Qui éduque les pré-adolescents? Toulouse: Eres.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J., et al. (2002). Television viewing and aggressive behavior during adolescence and adulthood. Science, 295, 2468–2471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E., & Liebes, T. (1992). The export of meaning: Cross-cultural readings of “Dallas”. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotilainen, S. (2009). Promoting youth civic participation with media production: The case of youth voice editorial board. In D. Frau-Meigs & J. Torrent (Eds.), Mapping media education policies in the world. New York: United Nations Alliance of Civilizations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotilainen, S., & Rantala, L. (2009). From seekers to activists: Youth civic identities in relations to media. Information, Communication & Society, 12(5), 658–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1995). Love at first byte? Building personal relationships over computer networks. In J. T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Understudied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 197–233). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (2002). Young people and new media. Childhood and the changing media environment. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., Couldry, N., & Markham, T. (2007). Youthful steps towards civic participation: does the Internet help? In B. D. Loader (Ed.), Political engagement, young people and the Internet (pp. 21–34). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Lievrouw, L. (2006). Handbook of new media: Social shaping and social consequences. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mares, M. L. (1996). Source confusion and cultivation. Human Communication Research, 23(2), 278–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, R. (1998). The political economy of global media. Media and Development, 45(4), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenna and Bargh (2004). The internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 573–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, D. (1994). Mass communication theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millwood Hargrave, A., & Livingstone, S. (2006). Harm and offence in media content: A review of the evidence. Bristol: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondzain, M.-J. (2002). L’image peut-elle tuer ? Paris: Bayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, K. C. (2001). Digital kids: The new online children’s consumer culture. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 635–650). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, K.C. (2012). Safeguards for youth in the digital marketing ecosystem. In Singer & Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children in the media (pp. 631–648).

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in Cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 80–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, M. R., & Roberts, L. D. (1998). Making MOOsic: The development of personal relationships on-line and a comparison to their off-line counterparts. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 517–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2009). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit internet material and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Journal of Communication, 59(3), 407–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, W. J. (2003). The 11 myths on media violence. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, W. J., & Warren, R. (1996). Considering policies to protect children from TV violence. Journal of Communication, 46(4), 116–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rideout, V. J., Vandewater, V. J., & Wartella, E. A. (2003). Zero to six: Electronic media in the lives of infants, toddlers and preschoolers. Menlo Park: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskos-Ewoldsen, D., & Monahan, J. (2007). Communication and social cognition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, W. (1983). The politics of TV violence: Policy uses of communication research. Beverley Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sefton-Green, J., & Sinker, R. (Eds.). (2000). Evaluating creativity: Making and learning by young people. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, J., & Morgan, M. (1999). Television and its viewers cultivation theory and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrum, L. J. (1995). Assessing the social influence of television: A social cognition perspective on cultivation effects. Communication Research, 22, 402–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Signorielli, N. (1989). Television and conceptions about sex roles: Maintaining conventionality and the status quo. Sex Roles, 21, 341–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstone, R. (2005). The sociology of mediation and communication. In C. J. Calhoun, C. R. Bryan, & S. Turner (Eds.), The sage handbook of sociology (pp. 187–207). New York: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, D. G., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.). (2001). Make-believe: Games and activities to foster imaginative play in children. Washington, DC: Magination.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, D. G., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of children and the media (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirota, R. (2006). Eléments pour une sociologie de l’enfance. Rennes: Presse universitaire de Rennes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solove, D. G. (2008). Understanding privacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. L. (1977). Constructing social problems. Cummings: Menlo Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, L. (1992). Make room for TV. Television and the family ideal in postwar America. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, S. (2004). Expressions of identity online: Prominent features and gender differences in adolescents’ world wide Web home pages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(2), 218–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichi, C. (1991). Electronic hearth: Creating an American television culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2010). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: an overview of child well-being in rich countries, Innocenti Report Card 7. http://www.unicefirc.org/publications/pdf/rc7_eng.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2012.

  • Valkenburg, P. M., & Cantor, J. (2001). The development of a child into a consumer. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyper-personal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartella, E. (2012). Children and interactive media. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Virtual communities as communities: Net surfers don’t ride alone. In M. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 167–194). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., Haase, A.Q., Witte, J., & Hampton K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplementsocialcapital? American Behavioral Science, 45, 436–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., & Haythornwhite (eds) (2002). The internet in everyday life. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, R. C., & Burdette, H. L. (2005). Resurrecting free play in young children: Looking beyond fitness and fatness to attention, affiliation, and affect. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 159(1), 46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, M., & Gavin, J. (2000). Age/sex/location: Uncovering the social cues in the development of online relationships. Cyberpsychology and Behaviour, 4(5), 623–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D., Consalvo, M., Kaplan, S., & Yee, N. (2009). Looking for gender: Gender roles and behaviors among online gamers. Journal of Communication, 59, 700–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolak, J., Mitchell, K. J., & Finklehor, D. (2003). Escaping or connecting? Characteristics of youth who form close online relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 26(1), 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M., & Montgomery, H. (Eds.). (2003). Understanding childhood: An interdisciplinary approach. London: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Divina Frau-Meigs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Frau-Meigs, D. (2014). Mediated Well-Being from the Perspective of Media and Communication Studies. In: Ben-Arieh, A., Casas, F., Frønes, I., Korbin, J. (eds) Handbook of Child Well-Being. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_154

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_154

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9062-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9063-8

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics