Advertisement

Economics of Headache

  • Francesco Saverio Mennini
  • Lara Gitto
  • Andrea Marcellusi
  • Fumihiko Sakai
  • Ichiro Arakawa
Reference work entry

Abstract

On the World Health Organization’s ranking of causes of disability, headache disorders are among the ten most disabling conditions, and among the five most disabling for women.

Hence, the impact of headache disorders is a problem of enormous proportions, both for individual and society. Health economic literature tried to assess the effects on individuals by examining the socioeconomic burden of headache disorders and identifying direct and indirect cost related to headache.

Migraine has a considerable impact on functional capacity, resulting in disrupted work and social activities. Indirect costs associated with reduced productivity represent a substantial proportion of the total cost of migraine as well. It is not surprising that chronic headache is one of modern society’s most costly illnesses.

Headache is well far behind other pathologies, where there is a greater knowledge of the economic aspects of both the pathology-related costs and the likely benefits resulting from different therapeutic approaches.

Notwithstanding the disease costing problems, it is important for the economic analysis to gain ground since there is a growing need to keep account of the available resources and the results attainable in the health care policies, from the central to the peripheral levels, where the evaluation tools referred to above prove even more expedient.

Given the social relevance of migraine, it is important to increase the knowledge related to the economic consequences of prevention through an increase of availability of health service.

From the analysis of prevalence, incidence, morbidity, and consequence of the state of health caused by headache and by looking at the Asian experience as well, it seems important to warn the scientific community and policy makers to implement specific “observatories.” For this reason, it is useful to increase economic evaluation studies to be able to estimate economic and financial costs of headache and its prevention (as in The Global Campaign to Reduce the Burden of Headache Worldwide – WHO).

Keywords

Indirect Cost Migraine Attack Headache Disorder Primary Care Doctor Headache Treatment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adelman JU, Von Seggern R (1995) Cost considerations in headache treatment. Part 1: prophylactic migraine treatment. Headache 35(8):479–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auray JP (2006) Socio-economic impact of migraine and headaches in France. CNS Drugs 20(1):37–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bigal ME, Rapoport AM, Bordini CA, Tepper SJ, Shftell FD, Speciali JG (2003) Burden of migraine in Brazil: estimate of cost of migraine to the public health system and an analytical study of the cost-effectiveness of a stratified model of care. Headache 43(7):742–754PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blumenfeld A (2003) Botulinum toxin type A treatment of disabling migraine headache: a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Headache 43:853–860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cerbo R, Pesare M, Aurilla C, Rondelli V, Barbanti P (2001) Socio-economic costs of migraine. J Headache Pain 2:S15–S19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarke CE, MacMillan L, Sondhi S, Wells NE (1996) Economic and social impact of migraine. Quart J Med 89:77–84Google Scholar
  7. Coloprisco G, Martelletti P (2003) Reduction in expenditure on analgesics during one year of treatment of chronic tension headache with BoNT-A. J Headache Pain 4:88–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diagnosis Procedure Combination Evaluation Section Committee, Remuneration Survey Group, Social Insurance Council, The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (May 14, 2009). http://www.mhlw.go.jp/shingi/2009/05/s0514-6.html (in Japanese)
  9. Dodick DW, Lipsy RJ (2004) Advances in migraine management: implications for managed care organizations. Manag Care 13(5):45–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Donia Sofio A, Mazzuca F, Mennini FS (2003) General disease costing principles. J Headache Pain 4(s01):s55–s58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edmeads J, Findlay H, Tugwell P, Pryse-Phillips W, Nelason RF, Murray TJ (1993) Impact of migraine and tension-type headache on life-style, consulting behaviour, and medication use: a Canadian population survey. Can J Neurol Sci 20:131–137PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuh JL et al (2008) Impact of migraine on the employed labor force in Taiwan. J Chin Med Assoc 71:74–78, (in Mandarin Chinese), JCMAPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gagne JJ, Leas B, Lofland JH, Goldfarb N, Freitag F, Silberstein S (2007) Quality of care measures for migraine: a comprehensive review. Dis Manage 10(3):138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goetzel RZ, Long SR, Ozminkowski RJ, Hawkins K, Wang S, Lynch W (2004) Health, absence, disability, and presenteeism cost estimates of certain physical and mental health conditions affecting US employers. J Occup Environ Med 46:398–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hawkins K, Wang S, Rupnow MF (2007) Indirect cost burden of migraine in the United States. J Occup Environ Med 49(4):368–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hazard E, Munakata J, Bigal ME, Rupnow MF, Lipton RB (2009) The burden of migraine in the United States: current and emerging perspectives on disease management and economic analysis. Value Health 12(1):55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hu XH, Markson LE, Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Berger ML (1999) Burden of migraine in the United States: disability and economic costs. Arch Intern Med 159(8):813–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kato Y et al (2007) J Pract Pharmacol 58(7):101–105 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  19. Kim CY (2009) Health technology assessment in South Korea. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 25(Suppl 1):219–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lafata JE, Moon C, Leotta C, Kolodner K, Poisson L, Lipton RB (2004) The medical care utilization and costs associated with migraine headache. J Gen Intern Med 19(10):1005–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lainez MJ (2009) The effect of migraine prophylaxis on migraine-related resource use and productivity. CNS Drugs 23(9):727–738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lanteri-Minet M et al (2003) Prevalence and description of chronic daily headache in the general population in France. Pain 102:143–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leonardi M, Steiner TJ, Scher AT, Lipton RB (2005) The global burden of migraine: measuring disability in headache disorders with WHO’s classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). J Headache Pain 6(6):429–440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Von Korff M (1994) The burden of migraine. A review of cost to society. Pharmacoeconomics 6(3):215–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Von Korff M (1997) Burden of migraine: societal costs and therapeutic opportunities. Neurology 48(3):S4–S9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Scher AI (2001) Epidemiology and economic impact of migraine. Curr Med Res Opin 17(1):s4–s12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Manaka S et al (2006) Faculty of Economics. http://homepage2.nifty.com/uoh/gakubu/keizaigakubu.htm (in Japanese)
  28. Mennini FS, Fioravanti L, Piasini L, Palazzo F, Coloprisco G, Martelletti P (2004) A one-year economic evaluation of botulinum toxin type A treatment of chronic tension-type headaches: part I. J Headache Pain 5:188–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mennini FS, Gitto L, Martelletti P (2008) Improving care through health economics analyses: cost of illness and headache. J Headache Pain 9:199–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mizuho A et al (2009) Pharmacol Stage 8(5):18–23 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  31. Munakata J, Hazard E, Serrano D, Klingman D, Rupnow MF, Tierce J, Reed M, Lipton RB (2009) Economic burden of transformed migraine: results from the American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention (AMPP) study. Headache 49(4):398–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nishimura S (2004) In: Sakai F (ed) Approach to migraine. Sentan Igaku-Sha, Tokyo, pp 56–66 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  33. Page MJ, Paramore LC, Doshi D, Rupnow MF (2009) Evaluation of resource utilization and cost burden before and after an employer-based migraine education program. J Occup Environ Med 51(2):213–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pesa J, Lage MJ (1994) The medical cost of migraine and comorbid anxiety and depression. Headache 34:337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pierangeli G, Cevoli S, Sancisi E, Grimaldi D, Zanigni S, Montagna P, Cortelli P (2006) Which therapy for which patient? Neurol Sci 27(2):S153–S158PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pini LA, Cainazzo MM, Brovia D (2005) Risk benefit and cost-benefit ratio in headache treatment. J Headache Pain 6(4):315–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Radtke A, Neuhauser H (2009) Prevalence and burden of headache and migraine in Germany. Headache 49(1):79–89PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rasmussen BK (1999) Epidemiology and socio-economic impact of headache. Cephalalgia 19(25):20–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Sakai F, Igarashi H (1997) Prevalence of migraine in Japan, a nationwide survey. Cephalalgia 17(1):15–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sakai T et al (2004) Jpn J Neurol Ther 21:449–458 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  41. Sakai T et al (2005) Prevalence of migraine in Japan, a nationwide survey. Cephalalgia 25:214–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shimizu T et al (2001) Diagn Treat 38(9):3–14 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  43. Shimizu T et al (2004) Jpn J Headache 31(2):81–83 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  44. Shin HE, Park JW, Kim YI, Lee KS (2008) Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) scores for migraine patients: their relation to disability as measured from a headache diary. J Clin Neurol 4:158–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shiroiwa T et al (2010) International survey on willingness-to-pay (WTP) for one additional QALY gained: what is the threshold of cost effectiveness? Health Econ 19(4):422–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Solomon GD, Price KL (1997) Burden of migraine. A review of its socioeconomic impact. Pharmacoeconomics 11(1):1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stang PE, Crown WH, Bizier R, Chatterton ML, White R (2004) The family impact and costs of migraine. Am J Manage Care 10(5):313–320Google Scholar
  48. Steiner TJ (2004) Lifting the burden: the global campaign against headache. Lancet Neurol 3(4):204–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Steiner TJ (2005) Lifting the burden: the global campaign to reduce the burden of headache worldwide. J Headache Pain 6(5):373–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Morganstein D, Lipton R (2003) Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce. J Am Med Assoc 290:2443–2454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stovner LJ, Andrée C (2008) Impact of headache in Europe: a review for the Eurolight project. J Headache Pain 9:139–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Suzuki N et al (2009) Jpn J Headache 36:81 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  53. Vinding GR, Zeeberg P, Lyngberg A, Nielsen RT, Jensen R (2007) The burden of headache in a patient population from a specialized headache centre. Cephalalgia 27(3):263–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Volcy-Gomez M (2006) The impact of migraine and other primary headaches on the health system and in social and economic terms. Rev Neurol 43(4):228–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang SJ, Chung CS, Chankrachang S, Ravishankar K, Merican JS, Salazar G, Siow C, Cheung RT, Phanthumchinda K, Sakai F (2008) Migraine disability awareness campaign in Asia: migraine assessment for prophylaxis. Headache 48(9):1356–1365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weiss MD, Bernards P, Price SJ (2008) Working through a migraine: addressing the hidden costs of workplace headaches. AAOHN J 56(12):495–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wheeler AH (1998) Botulinum toxin A, adjunctive therapy for refractory headaches associated with pericranial muscle tension. Headache 38(6):468–471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Lifting The Burden 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesco Saverio Mennini
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lara Gitto
    • 1
    • 3
  • Andrea Marcellusi
    • 1
  • Fumihiko Sakai
    • 4
  • Ichiro Arakawa
    • 5
  1. 1.CEIS Sanità (Centre for Health Economics and Management – CHEM)University Tor VergataRomeItaly
  2. 2.Faculty of StatisticsSapienza University of RomeRomeItaly
  3. 3.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly
  4. 4.International Headache Center, ShinyurigaokaKitasato University HospitalAsao KawasakiJapan
  5. 5.Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Teikyo Heisei UniversityChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations