Skip to main content

Multimediales Lernen in öffentlichen Bildungseinrichtungen am Beispiel von Museen und Ausstellungen

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Lernen mit Bildungstechnologien

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Psychologie ((SRP))

  • 881 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Multimediale Präsentationen sind wichtige Formen der Informationsvermittlung in öffentlichen Bildungseinrichtungen und Bildungsangeboten. Sie umfassen eine Vielfalt von medialen Darstellungsformaten und Funktionen. Am Beispiel von Museen und Ausstellungen werden die wesentlichen Merkmale non-formaler und informeller Lernumgebungen beschrieben und deren Konsequenzen für eine Reihe multimedialer Gestaltungs- und Lernprinzipien diskutiert. Es zeigt sich, dass sich die in Laborstudien entwickelten und bislang vorwiegend in formalen Lernsettings validierten Multimedia-Prinzipien nicht einfach auf Museen und Ausstellungen übertragen lassen. Dafür sind konzeptuelle Differenzierungen und Erweiterungen erforderlich.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Allen, S. (2004). Designs for learning: Studying science museum exhibits that do more than entertain. Science Education, 88, 17–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, P., & Sweller, J. (2015). The split-attention principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2. Aufl., S. 206–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitgood, S. (2010). An analysis of visitor circulation: Movement patterns and the general value principle. Curator, 49, 463–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, K. R. (2015). The multimedia principle. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2. Aufl., S. 174–205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H. (2009). Identity and the museum visitor experience. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2002). Lessons without limit. How free-choice learning is transforming education. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J., Moussouri, T., & Coulson, D. (1998). The effect of visitors’ agenda on museum learning. Curator, 41, 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, M., & Schwan, S. (2015). Explaining pictures: How verbal cues influence processing of pictorial learning material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 1006–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grüninger, R., Specht, I., Lewalter, D., & Schnotz, W. (2014). Fragile knowledge and conflicting evidence: What effects do contiguity and personal characteristics of museum visitors have on their processing depth? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(2), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutwill, J. P., & Allen, S. (2010). Facilitating family group inquiry at science museum exhibits. Science Education, 94, 710–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2007). Museums and education: Purpose, pedagogy, performance. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Low, R., & Sweller, J. (2015). The modality principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2. Aufl., S. 227–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2015a). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2. Aufl.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (Hrsg.). (2015b). Principles based on social cues in multimedia learning: Personalization, voice, image, and embodiment principles. In The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2. Aufl., S. 345–368). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2015). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2. Aufl., S. 279–315). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peponis, J., Dalton, R. C., Wineman, J., & Dalton, N. (2004). Measuring the effects of layout upon visitors’ spatial behaviors in open plan exhibition settings. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, 453–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, S., Bauer, J., & Lewalter, D. (2018). Visitor motivation: Development of a short scale for comparison across sites. Museum Management and Curatorship, 33(1), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rey, G. D. (2012). A review of research and a meta-analysis of the seductive detail effect. Educational Research Review, 7, 216–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rounds, J. (2004). Strategies for the curiosity-driven museum visitor. Curator: The Museum Journal, 47, 389–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiter, K. (2015). The learner control principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Hrsg.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2. Aufl., S. 487–512). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwan, S., Zahn, C., Wessel, D., Huff, M., Herrmann, N., & Reussner, E. (2008). Lernen in Museen und Ausstellungen – die Rolle digitaler Medien. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 36, 117–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwan, S., Grajal, A., & Lewalter, D. (2014). Understanding and engagement in places of science experience: Science museums, science centers, zoos, and aquariums. Educational Psychologist, 49, 70–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwan, S., Bauer, D., Kampschulte, L., & Hampp, C. (2017). Representation equals presentation? Photographs of objects receive less attention and are less well remembered that real objects. Journal of Media Psychology, 29, 176–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwan, S., Dreger, F., & Dutz, S. (2018). Multimedia in the wild: Testing the validity of multimedia learning principles in an art exhibition. Learning and Instruction, 55, 148–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrell, B. (1998). Paying attention: Visitors and museum exhibitions. Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.

    Google Scholar 

  • Töpper, J., Glaser, M., & Schwan, S. (2014). Extending social cue based principles of multimedia learning beyond their immediate effects. Learning and Instruction, 29, 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan Schwan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Schwan, S., Lewalter, D. (2019). Multimediales Lernen in öffentlichen Bildungseinrichtungen am Beispiel von Museen und Ausstellungen. In: Niegemann, H., Weinberger, A. (eds) Lernen mit Bildungstechnologien. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_57-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_57-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54373-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54373-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Psychologie

Publish with us

Policies and ethics