Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Lernen mit Bildungstechnologien pp 1–11Cite as

Akzeptanz von Bildungstechnologien

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Psychologie ((SRP))

Zusammenfassung

Akzeptanz ist die erste Voraussetzung für die Nutzung einer Bildungstechnologie und wird als Einstellungs- und Verhaltensakzeptanz operationalisiert. Der in diesem Kapitel angebotene Überblick über Akzeptanztheorien und -modelle lässt sich nach Explikation der Einstellungskomponenten in drei Kategorien einteilen: Akzeptanz als rationale Nutzungsentscheidung, als aktive Stimmungsregulation und als Nutzungsfortsetzung. Der Überblick wird mit einer kritischen Betrachtung sowie mit einer Diskussion der Konsequenzen für die mediendidaktische Forschung und Entwicklung abgeschlossen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Literatur

  • Agudo-Peregrina, Á. F., Hernández-García, Á., & Pascual-Miguel, F. J. (2014). Behavioral intention, use behavior and the acceptance of electronic learning systems: Differences between higher education and lifelong learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 4(3), 244–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 4(3), 211–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, E. A., Connolly, T. M., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). Engagement in digital entertainment games: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 771–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bürg, O., & Mandl, H. (2005). Akzeptanz von E-Learning in Unternehmen. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 4(2), 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Hrsg.), Perceiving, acting and knowing. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimley, D. M., Prochaska, G. E., & Prochaska, J. O. (1997). Condom use adoption and continuation: A transtheoretical approach. Health Education Research, 12(1), 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C. L., & Lu, H. P. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information and Management, 41, 853–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E., Gurevitch, M., & Haas, H. (1973). On the use of the mass media for important things. American Sociological Review, 38, 164–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward e-learning: An extension of the expectation-confirmation model. Computers & Education, 54(2), 506–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, H. P., & Yang, Y. W. (2014). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a social networking site: An extension of task-technology fit to social-technology fit. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Böling, D., & Müller, M. (1986). Akzeptanzfaktoren der Bürokommunikation. München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murillo Montes de Oca, A., & Nistor, N. (2014). Non-significant intention-behavior effects in educational technology acceptance: A case of competing cognitive scripts? Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nistor, N. (2014). Exploring non-significant intention effects on educational technology use behavior. Editorial of the special issue „Educational technology acceptance: Explaining non-significant intention-behavior effects“. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 299–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nistor, N., & Lerche, T. (2014). Attitude strength and educational technology acceptance. Poster presentation at the EARLI SIG 6&7 conference „Seeing eye to eye: New approaches to studying and designing social aspects of learning and instruction“, Rotterdam, 27–29 Aug. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nistor, N., Schworm, S., & Werner, M. (2012). Online help-seeking in communities of practice: Modeling the acceptance of conceptual artifacts. Computers & Education, 59(2), 774–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nistor, N., Göğüş, A., & Lerche, T. (2013). Educational technology acceptance across national and professional cultures: A European study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 733–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9292-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nistor, N., Baltes, B., Smeaton, G., Dascălu, M., Mihailă, D., & Trăușan-Matu, Ș. (2014a). Participation in virtual academic communities of practice under the influence of technology acceptance and community factors. A learning analytics application. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nistor, N., Lerche, T., Weinberger, A., Ceobanu, C., & Heymann, J. O. (2014b). Towards the integration of culture in the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01383.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nistor, N., Dascălu, M., Fesmire, D., Stavarache, L. L., & Trăușan-Matu, Ș. (2016). Teachers’ informal learning in blogger communities: Technology acceptance research meets learning analytics. Poster presentation at the EARLI SIG 6&7 conference „Learning and instruction at the crossroads of technology“, Dijon, 24–26 Aug. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pynoo, B., & van Braak, J. (2014). Predicting teachers’ generative and receptive use of an educational portal by intention, attitude and self-reported use. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 315–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 3–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, C., & Oh, H. (2010). The role of user resistance in the adoption of a mobile data service. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13(6), 663–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoonenboom, J. (2012). The use of technology as one of the possible means of performing instructor tasks: Putting technology acceptance in context. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1309–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, S. G., & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, H. (2013). A longitudinal study of herd behavior in the adoption and continued use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 1013–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 45, 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, P. S., Bizer, G. Y., & Krosnick, J. A. (2006). Exploring the latent structure of strength-related attitude attributes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 1–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, T., & Wänke, M. (2016). Attitudes and attitude change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P. (2010). Chasing the hottest IT: Effects of information technology fashion on organisations. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 63–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D. (2000). Mood management in the context of selective exposure theory. Annals of the International Communication Association, 23(1), 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (2014). Sensation seeking (Psychology revivals): Beyond the optimal level of arousal. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät für Psychologie und Pädagogik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland

    Nicolae Nistor

Authors
  1. Nicolae Nistor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolae Nistor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Germany

    Helmut Niegemann

  2. Lehrstuhl für Bildungstechnologie, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, Saarland, Germany

    Armin Weinberger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Nistor, N. (2018). Akzeptanz von Bildungstechnologien. In: Niegemann, H., Weinberger, A. (eds) Lernen mit Bildungstechnologien. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_46-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_46-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54373-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54373-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Psychologie

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation