Encyclopedia of Continuum Mechanics

Living Edition
| Editors: Holm Altenbach, Andreas Öchsner

Constitutive Modeling of Beams Using Mechanics of Structure Genome

  • Wenbin Yu
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53605-6_55-1

Synonyms

Definitions

A slender structure with one dimension much larger than the other two is defined as a beam. Since only external geometry matters, beams thus defined refer to not only regular structures with uniform, solid cross sections made of isotropic materials but also any other slender structures possibly made of composites with or without complex internal constructions. A beam can be considered as a one-dimensional (1D) continuum with kinetics, kinematics, and constitutive relations formulated using continuum mechanics. Constitutive modeling of beams is concerned with obtaining the constitutive relations for the 1D beam model. Mechanics of structure genome (MSG) is a unified approach for constitutive modeling of all types of composite structures including beams, plates, shells, and 3D solids.

Beam Modeling as Taught in Traditional Textbooks

Most beam theories taught in traditional textbooks and proposed...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Berdichevsky VL (2009) Variational principles of continuum mechanics, vols 1 and 2. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Cesnik CES, Hodges DH (1997) VABS: a new concept for composite rotor blade cross-sectional modeling. J Am Helicopter Soc 42(1):27–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Demasi L, Yu W (2013) Assess the accuracy of the variational asymptotic plate and shell analysis (VAPAS) using the generalized unified formulation (GUF). Mech Adv Mater Struct 20:227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goodsell J, Peng B, Pipes RB, Yu W (2017) Interlaminar stresses in composite laminates subjected to twisting deformation. J Appl Mech 84(10):104503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hodges DH (2006) Nonlinear composite beam theory. AIAA, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hodges DH, Yu W (2007) A rigorous, engineering-friendly approach for modeling realistic, composite rotor blades. Wind Energy 10(2):179–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hodges DH, Atılgan AR, Cesnik CES, Fulton MV (1992) On a simplified strain energy function for geometrically nonlinear behaviour of anisotropic beams. Compos Eng 2(5–7):513–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee CY, Yu W (2011a) Homogenization and dimensional reduction of composite plates with in-plane heterogeneity. Int J Solids Struct 48(10):1474–1484CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee CY, Yu W (2011b) Variational asymptotic modeling of composite beams with spanwise heterogeneity. Comput Struct 89:1503–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Liu X, Yu W (2016) A novel approach to analyze beam-like composite structures using mechanics of structure genome. Adv Eng Softw 100:238–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu N, Yu W (2017) Evaluation of smeared properties approaches and mechanics of structure genome for analyzing composite beams. Mech Adv Mater Struct.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2017.1330977
  12. Peng B, Goodsell J, Pipes RB, Yu W (2016) Generalized free-edge stress analysis using mechanics of structure genome. J Appl Mech 83(10):article 101013Google Scholar
  13. Roy S, Yu W (2009) Dimensional reduction of an end-electroded piezoelectric composite rod. Eur J Mech A/Solids 28(2):368–376CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang Q, Yu W (2012) Asymptotic multiphysics modeling of composite slender structures. Smart Mater Struct 21:article 035002Google Scholar
  15. Yu W (2016) A unified theory for constitutive modeling of composites. J Mech Mater Struct 11(4):379–411MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yu W, Blair M (2012) Gebt: a general-purpose nonlinear analysis tool for composite beams. Compos Struct 94:2677–2689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yu W, Hodges DH (2004) Elasticity solutions versus asymptotic sectional analysis of homogeneous, isotropic, prismatic beams. J Appl Mech 71(1):15–23CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Yu W, Hodges DH (2005) Generalized Timoshenko theory of the variational asymptotic beam sectional analysis. J Am Helicopter Soc 50(1):46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yu W, Tang T (2007) Variational asymptotic method for unit cell homogenization of periodically heterogeneous materials. Int J Solids Struct 44:3738–3755MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Yu W, Volovoi VV, Hodges DH, Hong X (2002) Validation of the variational asymptotic beam sectional analysis. AIAA J 40(10):2105–2113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yu W, H HD, Volovoi VV, Fuchs ED (2005) The Vlasov theory of the variational asymptotic beam sectional analysis. Thin-Walled Struct 43(9):1493–1511Google Scholar
  22. Yu W, Hodges DH, Ho JC (2012) Variational asymptotic beam sectional analysis – an updated version. Int J Eng Sci 59:40–64MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Aeronautics and AstronauticsPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Dewey Hodges
    • 1
  1. 1.Guggenheim School of Aerospace EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA