Encyclopedia of Continuum Mechanics

Living Edition
| Editors: Holm Altenbach, Andreas Öchsner

Analytical and Energy-Based Methods for Penetration Mechanics

  • F. Teixeira-DiasEmail author
  • N. Smith
  • E. Galiounas
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53605-6_207-1

Synonyms

Definitions

The terms perforation and penetration are used frequently throughout this chapter. It should however be noted that there is a significant difference between the two terms. Penetration refers to the ballistic impact of a target which results in the projectile becoming embedded or ricocheting off the target. Perforation describes the projectile impacting the target and passing completely through it. Plugging refers to the mechanical process of the formation of a plug of target material once it has been impacted by a projectile.

Introduction

A comprehensive understanding of ballistic impact has been essential ever since the invention of rudimentary weapons such as the bow and arrow. There has been since then a need to develop effective means of protection such as the shield. The rapid advancement of weapon technology has led to the progress of protective...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Atkins AG, Afzal Khan M, Liu JH (1998) Necking and radial cracking around perforations in thin sheets at normal incidence. Int J Impact Eng 21:521–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Awerbuch J, Bodner SR (1973) Experimental investigation of normal perforation of projectiles in metallic plates. Technical report, National Technical Information service, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  3. Borvik T (2000) Ballistic penetration and perforation of steel plates. Technical report, Norwegian University of Science and Technology – NUSTGoogle Scholar
  4. Borvik T, Leinum JR, Solberg JK, Hopperstad OS, Langseth M (2001) Observations on shear plug formation in Weldox 460e steel plates impacted by blunt-nosed projectiles. Int J Impact Eng 25:553–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao S, Zhang W, Deng T, Wei G (2012) Experimental investigation on the ballistic performance of monolithic and layered metal plates subjected to impact by blunt rigid projectiles. Int J Impact Eng 49:115–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goldsmith W (2001) Impact: the theory and physical behaviour of colliding solids. Dover Publications Inc., New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Greszczuk LB, Zukas JA, Nicholas T, Swift HF, Curran DR (1982) Impact dynamics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Horne MR (1979) Plastic theory of structures, Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Jaramaz S, Elek P, Mickovic D (2005) Modeling of perforation of plates and multilayered metal targets. Int J Solids Struct 42:1209–1224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jia X, Huang Z, Zu X, Gu X, Xiao Q (2014) Theoretical analysis of the disturbance of shaped charge jet penetrating a woven fabric rubber composite armor. Int J Impact Eng 65:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Krauthammer T (2008) Modern protective structures. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Landkof B, Goldsmith W (1985) Petalling of thin, metallic plates during penetration by cylindro-conical projectiles. Int J Solids Struct 21:245–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mackman ME, Goldsmith W (1978) The mechanics of penetration of projectiles into targets. Int J Sci 16:1–99Google Scholar
  14. Recht RF, Ipson TW (1963) Ballistic perforation dynamics. J Appl Mech 30:384–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Taylor G (1948) The formation and enlargement of a circular hole in a thin plastic sheet. Q J Mech Appl Math 1:103–124MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Thomson WT (1955) An approximate theory of armor penetration. J Appl Phys 26:80–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Velmurugan R, Sikarwar RS, Gupta NK (2014) Influence of fibre orientation and thickness on the response of glass/epoxy composites subjected to impact loading. Compos Part B 60:627–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Woodward RL, de Morton ME (1987) A structural model for thin plate perforation by normal impact of blunt projectiles. Int J Impact Eng 6:129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhang TG, Stronge WJ (1996) Theory for ballistic limit of thin ductile tubes hit by blunt missiles. Int J Impact Eng 18:735–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zukas JA (1980) Impact dynamics: theory and experiments. Technical report, US Army Armament Research and Development Command, MarylandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Infrastructure and Environment (IIE), School of EngineeringThe University of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Jaguar Land Rover LimitedWhitleyUK
  3. 3.Rolls-Royce PLCFiltonUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Filipe Teixeira-Dias
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of Edinburgh - School of EngineeringEdinburghUK