Encyclopedia of Continuum Mechanics

Living Edition
| Editors: Holm Altenbach, Andreas Öchsner

Continuous-Molecular Approach to Modeling of Nanostructures

  • Gwidon Szefer
  • Dorota Jasinska
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53605-6_169-1

Synonyms

Definitions

The continuous–molecular description of nanoscale systems (or nanoscale domains of representative volume elements RVE embedded into a continuum) presents a family of modeling methods which constitute a bridge (link) between molecular dynamics and continuum mechanics. It combines the molecular structure of the material with the continuum mechanics model taking intermolecular effects into account. Molecular dynamics treats the set of molecules as a system of material points subjected to intermolecular forces resulting from the interatomic potential. The potential is determined experimentally or results from quantum mechanics calculations. Nanostructures are material systems in which at least one dimension is in the range of nanometers.

Introduction

The rapid and intensive development of highly advanced technologies and materials in the last decades, and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Belytschko T, Xino S, Schatz G, Ruoff R (2002) Atomistic simulations of nanotube fracture. Phys Rev B 65(235430):1–8Google Scholar
  2. Goddard WA, Brenner DW, Lysherski SE, Iafrate GJ (eds) (2003) Handbook of nanoscience engineering and technology. CRC Press, London/New York/Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Jiang LY, Huang Y, Juang H, Ravichandran G, Gao H, Hwang K, Liu B (2006) A cohesive law for carbon nanotube/polymer interface based on the van der Walls force. J Mech Phys Solids 54:2436–2452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lee C, Wei X, Kysar J, Hone J (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayer graphene. Science 321:385–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Odegard G, Gates T, Nicholson L, Wise K (2002) Equivalent-continuum modeling of nano-structured materials. Compos Sci Technol 62:1869–1880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Sunyk R, Steinmann P (2003) On higher gradients in continuum-atomistic modelling. Int J Solids Struct 40:6877–6896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Szefer G (2014) Principlesof mechanics and modeling on nanoscale level. In: Muc A, Chwał M, Garstecki A, Szefer G (eds) Nanomechanics. Selected problems. Politechnika Krakowska, Krakow, pp 13–30Google Scholar
  8. Szefer G, Jasinska D (2009) Modeling of strains and stresses of material nanostructures. Bull Pol Acad Sci 57(1):41–46MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Szefer G, Jasinska D (2010) Continuum-molecular modelling of nanostructured materials. In: Albers B (ed) Continuous media with microstructure. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 189–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Tadmor E, Ortiz M, Phillips R (1996) Quasicontinuum analysis of defects in solids. Philos Mag A73:1529–1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Treacy M, Ebbesen T, Gibson J (1996) Exceptionally high young’s modulus observed for individual carbon nanotubes. Nature 381(6584):678–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tserpes KI, Papanikos P (2005) Finite element modeling of single-walled nanotubes. Compos Part B 36:468–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Yu M, Lourie O, Dyer M, Moloni K, Ruoff R (2000) Strength and breaking mechanism of multi-walled carbon nanotubes under tensile load. Science 287:637–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zanzotto G (1996) The Cauchy-born hypothesis. Nonlinear elasticity and mechanical twinning in crystals. Act Cryst A52:839–849MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cracow University of TechnologyCracowPoland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Victor A. Eremeyev
    • 1
  1. 1.Gdańsk University of TechnologyGdańskPoland