Skip to main content

Interventionelle Neuroradiologie

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 402 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Medizin ((SRM))

Zusammenfassung

Durch die zunehmende Entwicklung neuer Katheter- und Embolisationsmaterialien und insbesondere vor dem Hintergrund der positiven Schlaganfallsstudien zur Thrombektomie hat sich das Indikationsspektrum neuroradiologisch-interventioneller Maßnahmen in den letzten Jahren erheblich erweitert. Hauptindikationen zur endovaskulär-interventionellen Therapie sind: endovaskulär-mechanische Rekanalisationsbehandlung (Thrombektomie) bei akuter Ischämie, Verschluss von intrakraniellen Aneurysmen mit Platinspiralen und/oder Stents/Flow-Divertern, Verschluss von AV-Malformationen mit Gewebekleber, Partikeln und Platinspiralen, Verschluss von AV-Malformationen mit Gewebekleber, Partikeln und Platinspiralen, Dilatation und Stentbehandlung (perkutane transluminale Angioplastie + Stent) von extra- und intrakraniellen Gefäßstenosen, Devaskularisation gefäßreicher Tumoren oder bei Epistaxis (Glomustumoren, Meningeome, Nasenrachenfibrome, Metastasen).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Literatur

  • Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D et al (2015) A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372:11–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bracard S, Ducrocq X, Mas JL et al (2016) Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 15:1138–1147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briganti F, Leone G, Marseglia M et al (2015) Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: a systematic review. Neuroradiol J 28:365–375

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brott TG, Howard G, Roubin GS et al (2016) Long-term results of stenting versus endarterectomy for carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 374:1021–1031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chimowitz MI, Kokkinos J, Strong J et al (1995) The warfarin-aspirin symptomatic intracranial disease study. Neurology 45:1488–1493

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H et al (2005) Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 352:1305–1316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP et al (2011) Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 365:993–1003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ et al (2014) Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial. Lancet 383:333–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK et al (2015) Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372:1019–1030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greving JP et al (2014) Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol 13:59–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hong CS, Peterson EC, Ding D et al (2016) Intervention for a randomized trial of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA) – Eligible patients: an evidence-based review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 150:133–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IQWiG Arbeitspapier GA15-02 (2015) „Stents zur Behandlung intrakranieller Stenosen: VISSIT Studie und Akutbehandlung in Deutschland“. Clin Neuroradiol 25:445–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E et al (2015) Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372:2296–2306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knopman J, Stieg PE (2014) Management of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations. Lancet 383:581–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kurre W, Berkefeld J, Brassel F et al (2010) Inhospital complication rates after stent treatment of 388 symptomatic intracranial stenoses: results from the INTRASTENT multicentric registry. Stroke 41:494–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mocco J, Zaidat OO, von Kummer R et al (2016) Aspiration thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus intravenous alteplase alone. Stroke 47:2331–2338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr JP, Parides MK, Stapf C, Moquete E, Moy CS, Overbey JR et al (2014) Medical management with or without interventional therapy for unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations (ARUBA): a multicentre, non-blinded, randomised trial. Lancet 383:614–621

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I et al (2002) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 360:1267–1274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, LM Y et al (2005) International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366:809–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux AJ et al (2015) The durability of endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: 18 year follow-up of the UK cohort of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Lancet 385:691–697

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfield K, Matsumura JS, Chaturvedi S et al (2016) Randomized trial of stent versus surgery for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 374:1011–1020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A et al (2015) Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med 372:2285–2295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SPACE Collaborative Group, Ringleb PA, Allenberg J et al (2006) 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 368:1239–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UCAS Japan Investigators (2012) The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med 366:2474–2482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walcott BP, Stapleton CJ, Choudhri O, Patel AB (2016) Flow diversion for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. JAMA Neurol 73:1002–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J 3rd et al (2003) Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 362:103–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zaidat OO, Klucznik R, Alexander MJ et al (2008) The NIH registry on use of the Wingspan stent for symptomatic 70–99 % intracranial arterial stenosis. Neurology 70:1518–1524

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidat O, Fitzsimmons B, Woodward B et al (2015) Effect of a balloon-expandable intracranial stent vs. medical therapy on risk of stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis – the VISSIT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 3013:1240–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnd Dörfler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Dörfler, A., Forsting, M. (2018). Interventionelle Neuroradiologie. In: Berlit, P. (eds) Klinische Neurologie. Springer Reference Medizin. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44768-0_24-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44768-0_24-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44768-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44768-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Medizin

Publish with us

Policies and ethics