Advertisement

Kriegs- und Konfliktberichterstattung im digitalen Zeitalter

  • Marc JungblutEmail author
Living reference work entry

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag betrachtet Eigenschaften der Konfliktkommunikation im digitalen Zeitalter. Dabei wird zunächst das Verhältnis zwischen Medien und Politik in der Kriegsberichterstattung analysiert. Anschließend werden aus existierenden inhaltsanalytischen Studien zentrale Tendenzen der Kriegsberichterstattung abgeleitet. Schließlich wird der Wandel der Konfliktkommunikation durch die Digitalisierung beleuchtet und dessen Relevanz für zukünftige Forschung skizziert.

Schlüsselwörter

Konfliktberichterstattung Politische Kommunikation Medien im Krieg Propaganda Digitalisierung 

Literatur

  1. Althaus, Scott L., et al. 1996. Revising the indexing hypothesis: Officials, media, and the Libya crisis. Political Communication 13(4): 407–421.Google Scholar
  2. Archetti, Cristina. 2015. Terrorism, communication and new media: Explaining radicalization in the digital age. Perspectives on Terrorism 9(1): 49–59.Google Scholar
  3. Baden, Christian, und Chistoph O. Meyer. 2018. Dissecting media roles in conflict: A transactionist process model of conflict news production, dissemination and influence. In Media in war and armed conflict. The dynamics of conflict news production and dissemination, Hrsg. Romy Fröhlich, 23–48. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Baden, Christian, und Keren Tenenboim-Weinblatt. 2017. Convergent news? A longitudinal study of similarity and dissimilarity in the domestic and global coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Journal of Communication 67(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
  5. Baden, Christian, und Keren Tenenboim-Weinblatt. 2018. The search for common ground in conflict news research: Comparing the coverage of six current conflicts in domestic and international media over time. Media, War & Conflict 11(1): 22–45.Google Scholar
  6. Baum, Matthew A., und Philip B. K. Potter. 2008. The relationships between mass media, public opinion, and foreign policy: Toward a theoretical synthesis. The Annual Review of Political Science 11:39–65.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, W. Lance. 1990. Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication 40(2): 103–127.Google Scholar
  8. Bennett, W. Lance, Regina G. Lawrence, und Steven Livingston. 2006. None dare call it torture: Indexing and the Limits of Press Independence in the Abu Ghraib scandal. Journal of Communication 56(3): 467–485.Google Scholar
  9. Bradshaw, Samantha, und Philip N. Howard. 2017. Troops, trolls and troublemakers: A global inventory of organized Social Media manipulation. Computational Propaganda Research Project Working paper no. 2017.12. Oxford Internet Institute. https://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/89/2017/07/Troops-Trolls-and-Troublemakers.pdf. Zugegriffen am 08.05.2020.
  10. Brandenburg, Heinz. 2007. „Security at the source“. Embedding journalists as a superior strategy to military censorship. Journalism Studies 8(6): 948–963.Google Scholar
  11. Brantner, Cornelia, Katharina Lobinger, und Irmgard Wetzstein. 2011. Effects of visual framing on emotional responses and evaluations of news stories about the Gaza conflict 2009. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 88(3): 523–540.Google Scholar
  12. Brüggemann, Michael, und Hartmut Weßler. 2009. Medien im Krieg. Das Verhältnis von Medien und Politik im Zeitalter transnationaler Konfliktkommunikation. In Politik in der Mediendemokratie, Hrsg. Frank Marcinkowski und Barbara Pfetsch, 635–657. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  13. Brüggemann, Michael, Frank Esser, und Edda Humprecht. 2012. The strategic repertoire of publishers in the media crisis. Journalism Studies 13(5-6): 742–752.Google Scholar
  14. Chang, Tsan-Kuo, Pamela J. Shoemaker, und Nancy Brendlinger. 1987. Determinants of international news coverage in the US media. Communication Research 14(4): 396–414.Google Scholar
  15. Cottle, Simon, Richard Sambrook, und Nick Mosdell. 2016. Reporting dangerously: Journalist killings, intimidation and security. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Dobernig, Karin, und Katharina Lobinger. 2010. Covering conflict: Differences in visual and verbal news coverage of the Gaza crisis 2009 in four weekly news media. Journal of Visual Literacy 29(1): 88–105.Google Scholar
  17. Dominikowski, Thomas. 2004. Massenmedien und Massenkrieg. In Krieg als Medienereignis II: Krisenkommunikation im 21. Jahrhundert, Hrsg. Martin Löffelholz, 59–80. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  18. Eilders, Christiane, und Lutz M. Hagen. 2005. Kriegsberichterstattung Als Thema Kommunikationswissenschaftlicher Forschung. Ein Überblick zum Forschungsstand und den Beiträgen in diesem Themenheft. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 53(2–3): 205–221.Google Scholar
  19. Eilders, Christiane, und Albrecht Lüter. 2010. Research note: Germany at war: Competing framing strategies in German public discourse. European Journal of Communication 15(3): 415–428.Google Scholar
  20. Entman, Robert M. 1991. Symposium framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of communication 41(4): 6–27.Google Scholar
  21. Fahmy, Shahira. 2010. Contrasting visual frames of our times: A framing analysis of English- and Arabic-language press coverage of War on Terrorism. International Communication Gazette 72(8): 695–717.Google Scholar
  22. First, Anat. 1998. Who is the enemy? The portrayal of Arabs in Israeli television news. International Communication Gazette 60(3): 239–251.Google Scholar
  23. Fröhlich, Romy, und Marc Jungblut. 2018. The dynamics of strategic communication over time: Patterns of persuasive communication and its relevance for the construction of discourse on war and conflict. In Media in war and armed conflict. The dynamics of conflict news production and dissemination, Hrsg. Romy Fröhlich, 76–110. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Fröhlich, Romy, Helmut Scherer, und Bertram Scheufele. 2007. Kriegsberichterstattung in deutschen Qualitätszeitungen. Publizistik 52(1): 11–32.Google Scholar
  25. Galtung, Johan, und Mari Holmboe Ruge. 1965. The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of peace research 2(1): 64–90.Google Scholar
  26. Gans, Herbert J. 1979. Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  27. Gilboa, Eytan. 2005. The CNN effect: The search for a communication theory of international relations. Political Communication 22(1): 27–44.Google Scholar
  28. Glazier, Rebecca A., und Amber E. Boydstun. 2012. The President, the press, and the war: A tale of two framing agendas. Political Communication 29(4): 428–446.Google Scholar
  29. Gohdes, Anita R. 2018. Studying the internet and violent conflict. Conflict Management and Peace Science 35(1): 89–106.Google Scholar
  30. Gregory, Sam. 2015. Ubiquitous witnesses: Who creates the evidence and the live(d) experience of human rights violations? Information, Communication & Society 18(11): 1378–1392.Google Scholar
  31. Hallin, Daniel C. 1989. The uncensored war: The media and Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hamilton, John Maxwell, und Eric Jenner. 2004. Redefining foreign correspondence. Journalism 5(3): 301–321.Google Scholar
  33. Hawkins, Virgil. 2011. Media selectivity and the other side of the CNN Effect: The consequences of not paying attention to conflict. Media, War & Conflict 4(1): 55–68.Google Scholar
  34. Heimprecht, Christine. 2016. Determinanten der Auslandsberichterstattung: Eine Mehrebenenanalyse des internationalen Nachrichtenflusses. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  35. Høiby, Marte, und Rune Ottosen. 2019. Journalism under pressure in conflict zones: A study of journalists and editors in seven countries. Media, War & Conflict 12(1): 69–86.Google Scholar
  36. Hoskins, Andrew, und Ben O’Loughlin. 2015. Arrested war: the third phase of mediatization. Information, Communication & Society 18(11): 1320–1338.Google Scholar
  37. Jones, Timothy M., Peter Van Aelst, und Rens Vliegenthart. 2013. Foreign nation visibility in US news coverage: A longitudinal analysis (1950–2006). Communication Research 40(3): 417–436.Google Scholar
  38. Jungblut, Marc, und Ieva Zakareviciute. 2019. Do pictures tell a different story? A multimodal frame analysis of the 2014 Israel-Gaza Conflict. Journalism Practice 13(2): 206–228.Google Scholar
  39. Jungblut, Marc. 2020. Strategic communication and its role in conflict news: A computational analysis of the international news coverage on four conflicts. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  40. Kepplinger, Hans Mathias. 1992. Put in the public spotlight. Instrumental actualization of actors, events, and aspects in the coverage on Nicaragua. In The mass media in liberal democratic societies, Hrsg. S. Robert Rothman, 201–219. New York: Paragon House Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Kutz, Magnus-Sebastian. 2014. Öffentlichkeitsarbeit in Kriegen: Legitimation von Kosovo-, Afghanistan- und Irakkrieg in Deutschland und den USA. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  42. Liebes, Tamar. 1997. Reporting the Arab-Israeli conflict: How hegemony works. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Livingston, Steven, und Todd Eachus. 1995. Humanitarian crises and US foreign policy: Somalia and the CNN Effect reconsidered. Political Communication 12(4): 413–429.Google Scholar
  44. Löffelholz, Martin. 2004. Krisen- Und Kriegskommunikation als Forschungsfeld. In Krieg als Medienereignis II: Krisenkommunikation im 21. Jahrhundert, Hrsg. Martin Löffelholz, 13–55. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  45. Manor, Ilan, und Rhys Crilley. 2018. Visually framing the Gaza War of 2014: The Israel ministry of foreign affairs on Twitter. Media, War & Conflict 11(4): 369–391.Google Scholar
  46. Maurer, Marcus. 2016. Nonverbale politische Kommunikation. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  47. Mermin, Jonathan. 1997. Television news and American intervention in Somalia: The Myth of a media-driven foreign policy. Political Science Quarterly 112(3): 385–403.Google Scholar
  48. Palmer, Jerry, und Victoria Fontan. 2007. ,Our ears and our eyes‘: Journalists and fixers in Iraq. Journalism 8(1): 5–24.Google Scholar
  49. Palmer, Lindsay. 2018. ‚Being the bridge‘: News fixers’ perspectives on cultural difference in reporting the ‚War on Terror‘. Journalism 19(3): 314–332.Google Scholar
  50. Reese, Stephen D., und Seth C. Lewis. 2009. Framing the war on terror: The internalization of policy in the US press. Journalism 10(6): 777–797.Google Scholar
  51. Reinemann, Carsten, et al. 2019. Jugend-Medien-Extremismus. Wo Jugendliche mit Extremismus in Kontakt kommen und wie sie ihn erkennen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  52. Robinson, Piers. 2002. The CNN effect: The myth of news, foreign policy and intervention. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Robinson, Piers, Peter Goddard, Katy Parry, und Craig Murray. 2009. Testing models of media performance in wartime: U.K. TV News and the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. Journal of Communication 59(3): 534–563.Google Scholar
  54. Sangar, Eric, und Chistoph O. Meyer. 2018. The enduring value of reliable facts: Why NGOs have become more influential in conflict discourse. In Media in war and armed conflict. The dynamics of conflict news production and dissemination, Hrsg. Romy Fröhlich, 191–217. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Schwalbe, Carol B. 2013. Visually framing the invasion and occupation of Iraq in Time, Newsweek, and US News & World Report. International Journal of Communication 7:239–262.Google Scholar
  56. Sheafer, Tamir, et al. 2014. Relative political and value proximity in mediated public diplomacy: The effect of state-level homophily on international frame building. Political Communication 31(1): 149–167.Google Scholar
  57. Staab, Joachim Friedrich. 1990. Nachrichtenwert-Theorie: Formale Struktur und empirischer Gehalt. Freiburg/München: Alber.Google Scholar
  58. Tenenboim-Weinblatt, Keren, und Christian Baden. 2018. Gendered communication styles in the news: An algorithmic comparative study of conflict coverage. Communication Research.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218815383.
  59. Vogel, Ines C., Karin Stengel, und Marion Rahnke. 2014. Qualität der Fernsehberichterstattung über internationale Krisen und Konflikte. Ein Vergleich zwischen öffentlich-rechtlichen und privaten Nachrichtenanbietern. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft 62(1): 42–63.Google Scholar
  60. Wilke, Jürgen. 1995. Krieg als Medienereignis – Konstanten und Wandel eines endlosen Themas. In Medien und Krieg – Krieg in den Medien, Hrsg. Kurt Imhof und Peter Schulz, 21–35. Zürich: Seismo Verlag.Google Scholar
  61. Wolfsfeld, Gadi. 1997. Media and political conflict: News from the middle east. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Wolfsfeld, Gadi. 2004. Media and the path to peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Wolfsfeld, Gadi. 2013. The politics-media-politics principle: Towards a more comprehensive approach to political communication. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  64. Wolfsfeld, Gadi, und Linor Tsifroni. 2018. Political leaders, media and violent conflict in the digital age. In Media in war and armed conflict. The dynamics of conflict news production and dissemination, Hrsg. Romy Fröhlich, 218–242. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Wolfsfeld, Gadi, Paul Frosh, und Maurice T. Awabdy. 2008. Covering death in conflicts: Coverage of the Second Intifada on Israeli and Palestinian Television. Journal of Peace Research 45(3): 401–417.Google Scholar
  66. Zaller, John, und Dennis Chiu. 1996. Government’s little helper: US press coverage of foreign policy crises, 1945–1991. Political Communication 13(4): 385–405.Google Scholar
  67. Zeitzoff, Thomas. 2017. How social media is changing conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 61(9): 1970–1991.Google Scholar
  68. Zerback, Thomas, und Johannes Holzleitner. 2018. Under-cover: The influence of event- and context-traits on the visibility of armed conflicts in German newspaper coverage (1992–2013). Journalism 19(3): 366–383.Google Scholar
  69. Zillmann, Dolf, Silvia Knobloch, und Yu. Hong-sik. 2001. Effects of photographs on the selective reading of news reports. Media Psychology 3(4): 301–324.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0304_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenMünchenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations