Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Protest, Medien und Politische Kommunikation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Politische Kommunikation

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die historische Entwicklung, dominante Analyseperspektiven und innovative neuere Ansätze der Erforschung des Zusammenhangs von Protest, Medien und Kommunikation. Im Gegensatz zu akteurszentrierten und mediendeterministischen Ansätzen geht der Beitrag von einer wechselseitigen Bedingtheit von Medien, Kommunikationsformen und Akteuren aus und plädiert für eine Verbindung medienökologischer und praxeologischer Forschungsperspektiven.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Atton, Chris. 2003. Reshaping social movement media for a new Millennium. Social Movement Studies 2(1): 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baringhorst, Sigrid. 1998. Politik als Kampagne. Zur medialen Erzeugung von Solidarität. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baringhorst, Sigrid. 2014. Internet und Protest. Zum Wandel von Organisationsformen und Handlungsrepertoires – Ein Überblick. In Internet und Partizipation, Hrsg. Kathrin Voss, 89–113. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baringhorst, Sigrid. 2019. Auswirkungen der Digitalisierung auf soziale Bewegungen – Annahmen, Befunde und Desiderata der Forschung. In Politik in der digitalen Gesellschaft, Hrsg. Jeanette Hofmann, Norbert Kersting, Claudia Ritzi und Wolf Schünemann, 151–170. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belliger, Andréa, und David John Krieger. 2017. The end of media: Reconstructing media studies on the basis of actor-network theory. In Applying the actor-network theory in media studies, Hrsg. Markus Spöhrer und Beate Ochsner, 20–37. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. Lance, und Barbara Pfetsch. 2018. Rethinking political communication in a time of disrupted public spheres. Journal of Communication 68(2): 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. Lance, und Alexandra Segerberg. 2012. The logic of connective action. Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society 15(3): 739–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, Stefanie. 2000. Der Intra-Extra-Media-Vergleich – ein wenig genutztes Analyseinstrument und seine methodischen Anforderungen. Publizistik 45(1): 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bimber, Bruce. 2017. Three prompts for collective action in the context of digital media. Political Communication 34(1): 6–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carty, Victoria. 2002. Technology and counter-hegemonic movements. The case of Nike Corporation. Social Movement Studies 1(2): 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel. 2007. Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication 1:238–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, Andrew. 2017. The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, Steven H., und Miriam J. Metzger. 2001. The end of mass communication? Mass Communication and Society 4(4): 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, Lauren, Ariel Hasell, und Bruce Bimber. 2016. Collective action frames, advocacy organizations, and protests over same-sex marriage. International Journal of Communication 10:3785–3807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, Nick, und James Curran. 2003. Contesting media power. Alternative media in a networked world. Lanham/Boulder/New York/Toronto/Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dencik, Lina, und Oliver Leistert. 2015. Critical perspectives on social media and protest: Between control and emancipation. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolata, Ulrich, und Jan-Felix Schrape. 2014. Kollektives Handeln im Internet. Eine akteurtheoretische Fundierung. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 24(1): 5–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolata, Ulrich, und Jan-Felix Schrape. 2016. Masses, crowds, communities, movements: Collective action in the Internet age. Social Movement Studies 15(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, Jennifer, und Katrina Kimport. 2011. Digitally enabled social change. Acitivism in the Internet age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, Myra Marx, William Anthony Gamson, Jürgen Gerhards, und Dieter Rucht. 2002. Shaping abortion discourse. Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William A. 1988. A constructionist approach to mass media and public opinion. Symbolic Interaction 11(2): 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaßner, Volker. 2014. Greenaction – die Kampagnen-Community. In Internet und Partizipation, Hrsg. Kathrin Voss, 129–147. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gitlin, Todd. 1980. The whole world is watching. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, David. 2012. Inside occupy. Frankfurt a. M./New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcup, Tony, und Deirdre O’Neill. 2017. What is news? Journalism Studies 18(12): 1470–1488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, Summer. 2012. Social media and social movements: Facebook and an online Guatemalan justice movement that moved offline. New Media & Society 14(2): 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanpour, Navid. 2011. Media disruption exacerbates revolutionary unrest: Evidence from Mubarak’s natural experiment, Vortrag auf der Jahrestagung der American Political Science Association Social Science Research Network. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1903351. Zugegriffen am 26.07.2019.

  • Heumann, Maurits. 2017. Politics of glyphosate. Staatsarbeit an der Universität Siegen. Im Besitz der Verfasser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocke, Peter. 1998. Determining the selection bias in local and national newspaper reports on protest events. In Acts of dissent: New developments in the study of protest, Hrsg. Dieter Rucht, Ruud Koopmans und Friedhelm Neidhardt, 65–89. Berlin: Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz-Kimchi, Merav, und Idit Manosevitch. 2015. Mobilizing Facebook users against Facebook’s energy policy: The case of greenpeace unfriend coal campaign. Environmental Communication 9(2): 248–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavada, Anastasia. 2015. Creating the collective: Social media, the occupy movement and its constitution as a collective actor. Information, Communication & Society 18(8): 872–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavada, Anastasia und Thomas Poell. 2017. Trajectories of public contestation: Tracing the temporal, spatial, and material articulations of popular protest through digital media. In Digital media and the spatial transformation of public contention workshop of ECPR joint sessions workshop, 26.04.2017. Nottingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, Ruud, und Susan Olzak. 2004. Discursive opportunities and the evolution of right-wing violence in Germany. American Journal of Sociology 110(1): 198–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Werner. 2008. Die goldene Ringelgansfeder. Dingpolitik an der Nordsee. In Bruno Latours Kollektive, Hrsg. Georg Kneer, Markus Schroer und Erhard Schüttpelz, 425–457. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Kevin, Kurt Gray, und Jens Meierhenrich. 2014. The structure of online activism. Sociological Science 1:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Seth C., und Oscar Westlund. 2015. Actors, actants, audiences, and activities in crossmedia news work. A matrix and a research agenda. Digital Journalism 3(1): 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, Michael. 1968. Protest as a political resource. American Political Science Review 62(4): 1144–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marres, Noortje. 2007. The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Study of Science 37(5): 759–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattoni, Alice. 2012. Media practices and protest politics: How precarious workers mobilise. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattoni, Alice. 2016. Media practices and protest Politics: How precarious workers mobilise. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mattoni, Alice, und Emiliano Treré. 2014. Media practices, mediation processes, and mediatization in the study of social movements. Communication Theory 24:252–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John D., Clark McPhail, und Jackie Smith. 1996. Images of protest: Dimensions of selection bias in media coverage of Washington demonstrations, 1982 and 1991. American Sociological Review 61(3): 478–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, John D., Clark McPhail, Jackie Smith, und Louis J. Crishock. 1998. Electronic and print media representations of Washington, D.C. demonstrations, 1982 and 1991: A demography of description bias. In Acts of dissent: New developments in the study of protest, Hrsg. Dieter Rucht, Ruud Koopmans und Friedhelm Neidhardt, 113–130. Berlin: Ed. Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding media. The extensions of man. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercea, Dan, et al. 2016. Protest communication ecologies. Information, Communication & Society 19(3): 279–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monterde, Arnau, und John Postill. 2013. Mobile ensembles: The uses of mobile phones for social protest by Spain’s indignados. In Routledge companion to mobile media, Hrsg. Gerard Goggin und Larissa Hjorth, 429–438. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, Evgeny. 2011. The net delusion. The dark side of Internet freedom. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motta, Renata. 2015. Transnational discursive opportunities and social movement risk frames opposing GMOs. Social Movement Studies 14(5): 576–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Day, Vicki L. 2000. Information ecologies. The Serials Librarian 38(1–2): 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postill, John. 2010. Theorising media and practice. In Theorising media and practice, Hrsg. Birgit Bräuchler und John Postill, 1–32. Oxford and New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajão, Raoni, und Juliane Jarke. 2018. The materiality of data transparency and the (re)configuration of environmental activism in the Brazilian Amazon. Social Movement Studies 17(3): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rucht, Dieter. 1993. Parteien, Verbände und Bewegungen als Systeme politischer Interessenvermittlung. In Stand und Perspektiven der Parteienforschung in Deutschland, Hrsg. Oskar Niedermayer und Richard Stöss, 251–275. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rucht, Dieter. 2004. The quadruple „A“: Media strategies of protest movements since the 1960s. In Cyber protest: New media, citizens and social movements, Hrsg. Wim van de Donk, Brian D. Loader, Paul G. Nixon und Dieter Rucht, 29–56. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sander, Hendrik. 2017. Ende Gelände: Anti-Kohle-Proteste in Deutschland. Forschungsjournal Soziale Bewegungen 30(1): 26–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, Theodore. 2008. Social practices. A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, Theodore. 2017. Multiplicity in social theory and practice ontology. In Praxeological political analysis, Hrsg. Michael Jonas und Beate Littig, 17–34. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrape, Jan-Felix. 2011. Social Media, Massenmedien und gesellschaftliche Wirklichkeitskonstruktion. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 21(3): 407–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedlmaier, Alexander. 2018. Konsum und Gewalt. Radikaler Protest in der Bundesrepublik. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirky, Clay. 2009. Here comes everybody. The power of organizing without organizations. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, David A., und Robert D. Benford. 1988. Ideology, frame resonance and participant mobilization. In From structure to action: Social movement participation across cultures, Hrsg. Bert Klandermanns, Hanspeter Kriesi und Sidney G. Tarrow, 197–217. Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, David A., und Robert D. Benford. 1992. Master frames and cycles of protest. In Frontiers in social movement theory, Hrsg. Aldon Morris und Carol M. Mueller, 133–155. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Andrew. 2009. The revolution will be twittered. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/daily-dish/archive/2009/06/the-revolution-will-be-twittered/200478/. Zugegriffen am 26.07.2019.

  • Theocharis, Yannis, Will Lowe, Jan W. van Deth, und Gema García-Albacete. 2015. Using Twitter to mobilize protest action: Online mobilization patterns and action repertoires in the occupy wall street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi movements. Information, Communication & Society 18(2): 202–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treré, Emiliano. 2019. Hybrid media activism. Ecologies, imaginaries, algorithms. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treré, Emiliano, und Alice Mattoni. 2016. Media ecologies and protest movements: Main perspectives and key lessons. Information, Communication & Society 19(3): 290–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufecki, Zeynep, und Christopher Wilson. 2012. Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir square. Journal of Communication 62(2): 468–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Laer, Jeroen, und Jan Van Aelst. 2010. Internet and social movement action repertoires. Information, Communication and Society 13(8): 1146–1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, Jeffrey. 2007. (Gegen-)Öffentlichkeit in der Mediengesellschaft. Analyse eines medialen Spannungsverhältnisses. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Mundo. 2014. Mobilisierende Internetvideos zwischen Culture Jamming und Framing. In Digitale Gesellschaft – Partizipationskulturen im Netz, Hrsg. Caja Timm, Mark Dang-Anh und Jessica Einspänner-Pflock, 128–147. Münster: Lit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Mundo. 2015. Anti-Fracking Kampagnen und ihre Mediennutzung. In Rudolf Speth und Annette Zimmer, Hrsg. Lobby Work, 283–299. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Mundo, Lisa Villioth, und Jörg Radtke. 2019. Foodsharing as the public manufacturing of food reuse. In Infrastructuring publics/making infrastructures public, Hrsg. Matthias Korn, Wolfgang Reißmann, Tobias Röhl und David Sittler, 113–137. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, Luke. 2014. Everyday politics, social practices and movement networks: Daily life in Barcelona’s social centres. The British Journal of Sociology 66(2): 236–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Seminar für Sozialwissenschaften, Universität Siegen, Siegen, Deutschland

    Sigrid Baringhorst & Mundo Yang

Authors
  1. Sigrid Baringhorst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mundo Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sigrid Baringhorst .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany

    Isabelle Borucki

  2. Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Katharina Kleinen-von Königslöw

  3. Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

    Stefan Marschall

  4. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany

    Thomas Zerback

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Baringhorst, S., Yang, M. (2020). Protest, Medien und Politische Kommunikation. In: Borucki, I., Kleinen-von Königslöw, K., Marschall, S., Zerback, T. (eds) Handbuch Politische Kommunikation. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26242-6_20-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26242-6_20-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-26242-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-26242-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation