Skip to main content

Familie und Inklusion

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Familie

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Beitrag versucht einen Zugang zum bislang in der Familienforschung kaum diskutierten Themenbereich der Inklusion herzustellen. Nach einer Darstellung der Entstehung, der Bedeutung und der Veränderung des pädagogischen Verständnisses von Inklusion sondiert er dieses unter dem Fokus einer menschenrechtlichen Orientierung und diskutiert grundlegende Fragen unter der Perspektive des Capability Approach. Ein abschließender Teil benennt exemplarisch die Inklusion in die Familie, in das Wohnumfeld und die Unterstützung inklusiver Bildungswege durch die Familie als Felder bisheriger Forschungen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Auf der Webseite des Europarates existiert auch eine inoffizielle deutsche Version zum Download (https://www.coe.int/en/web/disability/strategy-2017-2023. Zugegriffen am 18.09.2018).

  2. 2.

    Ontological individualism states that only individuals and their properties exist, and that all social entities and properties can be identified by reducing them to individuals and their properties“ (Robeyns 2017, S. 184).

Literatur

  • Allan, J. (2005). Inclusion as an ethical project. In S. Tremain (Hrsg.), Foucault and the government of disability (S. 281–298). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biewer, G. (2001). Vom Integrationsmodell für Behinderte zur Schule für alle Kinder. Neuwied/Berlin: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biewer, G. (2006). Schulische Integration in Deutschland und Österreich im Vergleich. Erziehung und Unterricht – Österreichische Pädagogische Zeitschrift, 156(1–2), 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biewer, G. (2017). Grundlagen der Heilpädagogik und Inklusiven Pädagogik (3. Aufl.). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt (UTB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biewer, G., & Proyer, M. (2017). The republic of Austria. In M. L. Wehmeyer & J. R. Patton (Hrsg.), The Praeger International handbook of special education (Bd. 2, S. 239–248). Santa Barbara/Denver: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biewer, G., & Schütz, S. (2016). Inklusion. In I. Hedderich, G. Biewer, J. Hollenweger & R. Markowetz (Hrsg.), Handbuch Inklusion und Sonderpädagogik (S. 123–127). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt (UTB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Biewer, G., Buchner, T., Shevlin, M., Smyth, F., Siska, J., et al. (2015). Pathways to inclusion in European higher education systems. ALTER – European Journal of Disability Research, 9(4), 278–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alter.2015.02.001. Zugegriffen am 17.03.2020.

  • Biggeri, M., & Santi, M. (2012). The missing dimensions of children’s well-being and well-becoming in education systems: Capabilities and philosophy for children. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 13(3), 373–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, Helmut von. (1976). Vorurteile gegen behinderte Kinder, ihre Familien und Schulen. Berlin: Marhold

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse S., & Helsper W. (2007). Familie und Schule. In J. Ecarius (Hrsg.), Handbuch Familie. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, E., Swedeen, B., Walter, M. C. M., & Moss, C. C. (2012). „I don’t have to do this by myself?“ Parent-led community conversations to promote inclusion. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37(1), 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2017). Human rights: A reality for all. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalkilic, M., & Vadeboncoeur, J. A. (2016). Re-framing inclusive education through the capability approach: An elaboration of the model of relational inclusion. Global Education Review, 3(3), 122–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deneulin, S., & Stewart, F. (2002). Amartya Sen’s contribution to development thinking. Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(2), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02686262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission. (2017). Bildungsagenda 2030. Aktionsrahmen für die Umsetzung von Sustainable Development Goal 4. Inklusive, chancengerechte und hochwertige Bildung sowie lebenslanges Lernen für alle. Kurzfassung der Deutschen UNESCO-Kommission. Bonn: Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelbrecht, P., Oswald, M., Swart, E., Kitching, A., & Eloff, I. (2005). Parents’ experiences of their rights in the implementation of inclusive education in South Africa. School Psychology International, 26(4), 459–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. (2002). Collective capabilities, culture, and Amartya Sen’s development as freedom. Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(2), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02686261.

  • Foster, J. E., & Handy, C. (2008). External capabilities (OPHI working paper series, no 08/2008). Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornby, G., & Lafaele, R. (2011). Barriers to parental involvement in education: An explanatory model. Educational Review, 63(1), 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. L., & Gallus, K. L. (2016). Understanding deinstitutionalization: What families value and desire in the transition to community living. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(2), 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalvani, P. (2012). Parents’ participation in special education in the context of implicit educational ideologies and socioeconomic status. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47(4), 474–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities. The human development approach. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C., & Sen, A. (Hrsg.). (2009). The quality of life. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perchinig, B. (2001). Systeme der Zugehörigkeit. In Forum Politische Bildung (Hrsg.), Dazugehören? Fremdenfeindlichkeit, Migration, Integration (Sonderband der Informationen zur Politischen Bildung, S. 6–13). Innsbruck/Wien: Studien Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piškur, B., Beurskens, A., Jongmans, M., Ketelaar, M., & Smeets, R. (2015). What do parents need to enhance participation of their school-aged child with a physical disability? A cross-sectional study in the Netherlands. Child: Care, Health and Development, 41(1), 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reindal, S. M. (2010). What is the purpose? Reflections on inclusion and special education from a capability perspective. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 25(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robeyns, I. (2011). The Capability Approach. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/capability-approach/#FunCap. Zugegriffen am 10.03.2020.

  • Robeyns, I. (2017). Well-being, freedom and social justice. The capability approach re-examined. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers. https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0130. Zugegriffen am 17.03.2020.

  • Schiemer, M. (2017). Education for children with disabilities in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Developing a sense of belonging. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60768-9.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schweiker, W. (2017). Prinzip Inklusion. Grundlagen einer interdisziplinären Metatheorie in religionspädagogischer Perspektive. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1979). Equality of What. The Tanner lecture on human values held on 22nd of May 1979. Stanford: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2009). Inequality reexamined. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soodak, L. C., & Erwin, E. J. (2000). Valued member or tolerated participant: Parents’ experiences in inclusive early childhood settings. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 25(1), 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, F. (2005). Groups and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880500120517. Zugegriffen am 17.03.2020.

  • Szumski, G., & Karwowski, M. (2012). School achievement of children with intellectual disability: The role of socioeconomic status, placement and parents’ engagement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 1615–1625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2006). UN Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and optional protocol.UN online. Sustainable development goal 4. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg4. Zugegriffen am 17.03.2020.

  • Underwood, K., Valeo, A., & Wood, R. (2012). Understanding inclusive early childhood education: A capability approach. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(4), 290–299. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2012.13.4.290. Zugegriffen am 17.03.2020.

  • Underwood, K., et al. (2015). Understanding young children’s capabilities: Approaches to interviews with young children experiencing disability. Child Care in Practice, 21(3), 220–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. World Conference on Special Needs Education. Access and Quality. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2005). Guidelines for inclusion: Ensuring access to education for all. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2009a). UNESCO policy guidelines for inclusion in education. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2009b). UNESCO policy brief on early childhood. Inclusion of children with disabilities: The early childhood imperative. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001831/183156e.pdf.. Zugegriffen am 17.03.2020.

  • UNESCO. (2015). Incheon declaration and framework for action for the implementation of sustainable development goal 4. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ville, I., et al. (2003). Disability and a sense of community belonging A study among tetraplegic spinal-cord-injured persons in France. Social Science & Medicine, 56(2), 321–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiß, H. (Hrsg.). (2000). Frühförderung mit Kindern und Familien in Armutslagen. München: Reinhardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yssel, N., Engelbrecht, P., Oswald, M. M., Eloff, I., & Swart, E. (2007). Views of inclusion: A comparative study of parents’ perceptions in South Africa and the United States. Remedial and Special Education, 28(6), 356–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Literatur zum Weiterlesen

  • Eckert, A. (2012). Familie und Behinderung. Studien zur Lebenssituation mit einem behinderten Kind (2. Aufl.). Hamburg: Kovac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartas, D. (2014). Family Policy and the Capability Approach to Parents’ and Children’s Well-Being. In Parenting, Family Policy and Children’s Well-Being in an Unequal Society (Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wachtel, G. (2016). Familie. In I. Hedderich et al. (Hrsg.), Handbuch Inklusion und Sonderpädagogik (S. 427–432). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt (UTB).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margarita Bilgeri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Bilgeri, M., Biewer, G. (2020). Familie und Inklusion. In: Ecarius, J., Schierbaum, A. (eds) Handbuch Familie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19416-1_60-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19416-1_60-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-19416-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-19416-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics