Skip to main content

Familiale Generationsbeziehungen

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Familie

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit intergenerationalen Familienbeziehungen im Kulturvergleich. Nach einer Einführung in grundlegende theoretische Modelle und Forschungstraditionen werden im zweiten Teil Forschungsprojekte und -ergebnisse zur Ausgestaltung von Generationsbeziehungen in verschiedenen kulturellen Kontexten und im Zusammenhang mit Migration aufgezeigt sowie die Bedeutung von gesellschaftlichen Rahmenbedingungen für die Ausgestaltung von familiären Generationsbeziehungen dargelegt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Albert, I., & Barros, S. (2017). Family cultures in the context of migration and ageing. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 55, 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-017-9381-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, I., Ferring, D., & Michels, T. (2013). Intergenerational family relations in Luxembourg: Family values and intergenerational solidarity in Portuguese immigrant and Luxembourgish families. European Psychologist, 18(1), 59–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, I., Barros Coimbra, S., & Ferring, D. (2016). Future plans and the regulation of well-being of older Portuguese immigrants in Luxembourg. Social Inquiry into Well-being, 2(1), 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, I., Abbey, E., & Valsiner, J. (Hrsg.). (2018). Cultural psychology of transgenerational family relations: Investigating ambivalences. Charlotte: Information Age Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonucci, T. C., & Jackson, J. S. (1990). The role of reciprocity in social support. In B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason & G. R. Pierce (Hrsg.), Social support: An interactional view (S. 173–198). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attias-Donfut, C., Ogg, J., & Wolff, F.-C. (2005). European patterns of intergenerational financial and time transfer. European Journal of Ageing, 2, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-005-0008-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barni, D., Rosnati, R., & Ranieri, S. (2013). Value transmission between parents and their adolescent children: The process and its outcomes. A psycho-social perspective. In I. Albert & D. Ferring (Hrsg.), Intergenerational relations in society and family: European perspectives (S. 101–117). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, V. L., & Roberts, R. E. L. (1991). Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: An example of formal theory construction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 856–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, V. L., Giarrusso, R., Marby, J. B., & Silverstein, M. (2002). Solidarity, conflict, and ambivalence: Complementary or competing perspectives on intergenerational relationships? Journal of Marriage and Family, 64, 568–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordone, V., & de Valk, H. A. G. (2016). Intergenerational support among migrant families in Europe. European Journal of Ageing, 13(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-016-0363-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, M. (2013). Intergenerational help and public assistance in Europe. A case of specialization? European Societies, 15, 26–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2012.726733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, M., Haberkern, K., & Szydlik, M. (2009). Intergenerational help and care in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25, 585–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In R. M. Lerner (Hrsg.), Handbook of child psychology: 1, Theoretical models of human development (S. 793–829). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daatland, S. O., & Herlofson, K. (2003). Families and welfare states: Substitution or complementarity? In A. Lowenstein & J. Ogg (Hrsg.), OASIS: Old age and autonomy. The role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. The final report (S. 281–305). Haifa: University of Haifa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra, P. (2018). Cross-national differences in intergenerational family relations: The influence of public policy arrangements. Innovation in Aging, 2(1), igx032. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igx032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra, P., & Fokkema, T. (2011). Relationships between parents and their adult children: A West European typology of late-life families. Ageing and Society, 31(4), 545–569. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10001108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, J. T. (Hrsg.). (1972). The satisfaction and costs of children: Theories, concepts and methods. Honolulu: East-West Population Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferring, D. (2017). The family in us: Family story, family identity and self-reproductive adaptive behavior. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51, 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-017-9383-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferring, D., Michels, T., Boll, T., & Filipp, S. H. (2009). Emotional relationship quality of adult children with ageing parents: On solidarity, conflict and ambivalence. European Journal of Ageing, 6(4), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-009-0133-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, C. (2010). Migration and intergenerational solidarity: Portuguese immigrants in Luxembourg. Lien social et Politiques, 64, 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgas, J., Berry, J. W., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç., & Poortinga, Y. H. (Hrsg.). (2006). Families across cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K.-K. (1999). Filial piety and loyalty: Two types of social identification in Confucianism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2013). Adolescent autonomy-relatedness and the family in cultural context: What is optimal? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kağıtçıbaşı, C., & Ataca, B. (2005). Value of children and family change: A three decade portrait from Turkey. Applied Psychology: International Review, 54, 317–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmijn, M., & Saraceno, C. (2008). A comparative perspective on intergenerational support. European Societies, 10, 479–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616690701744364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutrelakos, J. (2004). Acculturation of Greek Americans: Change and continuity in cognitive schemas guiding intimate relationships. International Journal of Psychology, 39, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590344000213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litwin, H., Vogel, C., Künemund, H., & Kohli, M. (2008). The balance of intergenerational exchange: Correlates of net transfers in Germany and Israel. European Journal of Ageing, 5(2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-008-0079-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubiewska, K., Albert, I., Trommsdorff, G., & Friedlmeier, M. (2018). Relations between parenting and adolescent’s attachment in families differing in solidarity patterns. Social Development, 27, 984–1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüscher, K., & Pillemer, K. (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence. A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 413–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, B. (2013). Family change theory: A preliminary evaluation on the basis of recent cross-cultural studies. In I. Albert & D. Ferring (Hrsg.), Intergenerational relations. European perspectives on family and society (S. 167–187). Cambridge: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, B., & Trommsdorff, G. (2010). Adolescents’ value of children and their intentions to have children: A cross-cultural and multilevel analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(5–6), 671–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, B., Trommsdorff, G., Kagitcibasi, C., & Mishra, R. C. (2012). Family models of independence/interdependence and their intergenerational similarity in Germany, Turkey, and India. Family Science, 3(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424620.2011.671503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, B., Trommsdorff, G., Friedlmeier, M., Lubiewska, K., Barni, D., Kasearu, K., & Albert, I. (2015). The roles of religiosity and affluence for adolescents’ family orientation: Multilevel analyses of 18 cultures. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 7(3), 47–88. https://doi.org/10.14658/pupj-ijse-2015-3-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merz, E.-M., Özeke-Kocabas, E., Oort, F. J., & Schuengel, C. (2009). Intergenerational family solidarity: Value differences between immigrant groups and generations. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michels, T., Albert, I., & Ferring, D. (2011). Emotional relations with grandparents and received support: The adolescent view. Journal of Intergenerational Relations, 9(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2011.593435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrig-Chiello, P. (2014). Wenn Kinder gross und Eltern alt werden. Familiale Veränderungen im mittleren Lebensalter. „beziehungsweise“, Informationsdienst des Österreichischen Instituts für Familienforschung der Universität Wien, 1–5. Januar/Februar 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbaum, F., & Trommsdorff, G. (2007). Do roots and wings complement or oppose one another? The socialization of relatedness and autonomy in cultural context. In J. E. Grusec & P. Hastings (Hrsg.), The handbook of socialization (S. 461–489). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B., & Trommsdorff, G. (2005). Intergenerationaler Austausch von Unterstützung und Reziprozität im Kulturvergleich. In A. Steinbach (Hrsg.), Generatives Verhalten und Generationenbeziehungen (S. 199–212). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B., Trommsdorff, G., Zheng, G., & Shi, S. (2010). Reciprocity in intergenerational support: A comparison of Chinese and German adult daughters. Journal of Family Issues, 31, 234–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X09347991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, B., Mayer, B., Trommsdorff, G., Ben-Arieh, A., Friedlmeier, M., Lubiewska, K., Mishra, R., Peltzer, K. (2012). Does the importance of parent and peer relationships for adolescents’ life satisfaction vary across cultures? Journal of Early Adolescence, 32, 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, X. (2005). Families and intergenerational relationships in China. Globalization, tradition, social transformation and elderly care. In A. Steinbach (Hrsg.), Generatives Verhalten und Generationenbeziehungen (S. 213–232). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M., Gans, D., & Yang, F. M. (2006). Intergenerational support to aging parents: The role of norms and needs. Journal of Family Issues, 27(8), 1068–1084. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X06288120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, M., Gans, D., Lowenstein, A., Giarrusso, R., & Bengtson, V. L. (2010). Older parent – child relationships in six developed nations: Comparisons at the intersection of affection and conflict. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 1006–1021. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00745.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trommsdorff, G. (2006). Parent-child relations over the life-span. A cross-cultural perspective. In K. H. Rubin & O. B. Chung (Hrsg.), Parenting beliefs, behaviors, and parent-child relations. A cross-cultural perspective (S. 143–183). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trommsdorff, G., & Nauck, B. (2005). The value of children in cross-cultural perspective – Introduction. In G. Trommsdorff & B. Nauck (Eds.), The value of children in cross-cultural perspective Case of studies from eight societies (S. 9–16). Lengerich: Pabst Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trommsdorff, G., & Nauck, B. (2006). Demographic changes and parent-child relationships. Parenting: Science and Practice, 6, 343–360. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327922par0604_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gaalen, R. I., Dykstra, P. A., & Komter, A. E. (2010). Where is the exit? Intergenerational ambivalence and relationship quality in high contact ties. Journal of Aging Studies, 24(2), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2008.10.006.

Literatur zum Weiterlesen

  • Albert, I., Emirhafizovic, M., Shpigelman, C. N., & Trummer, U. (Hrsg.). (2020). Families and family values in society and culture. Charlotte: Information Age Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Börsch-Supan, A., Brandt, M., Litwin, H., & Weber, G. (Hrsg.). (2013). Active ageing and solidarity between generations in Europe: First results from SHARE after the economic crisis. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2007). Family, self, and human development across cultures: Theory and applications (2. Aufl.). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Albert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Albert, I., Schwarz, B., Mayer, B., Trommsdorff, G. (2020). Familiale Generationsbeziehungen. In: Ecarius, J., Schierbaum, A. (eds) Handbuch Familie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19416-1_24-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19416-1_24-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-19416-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-19416-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics