Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mixed Methods-Forschung in der Psychologie

Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Psychologie ((SRP))

Zusammenfassung

Mixed Methods bezeichnet im weitesten Sinne die Kombination sowie die Integration von qualitativen und quantitativen Elementen innerhalb einer Untersuchung oder mehrerer aufeinander bezogener Untersuchungen. In den Sozialwissenschaften generell haben Mixed Methods in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten zunehmend an Bedeutung gewonnen. In der nach wie vor quantitativ dominierten Psychologie ist die Relevanz dieser Forschungstradition insgesamt zwar geringer anzusetzen, aber auch hier werden Mixed Methods inzwischen über verschiedene Teildisziplinen hinweg vermehrt eingesetzt. In diesem Beitrag gehen wir zunächst auf die Entwicklung der Mixed Methods-Forschung allgemein sowie in der Psychologie im Besonderen ein. Anschließend stellen wir zentrale methodologische Bereiche der gegenwärtigen Mixed Methods-Diskussion ausführlicher dar, wie beispielsweise die Definition von Mixed Methods und die Abgrenzung von Mixed Methods gegenüber verwandten Begriffen. Auch gehen wir in diesem Zusammenhang genauer auf Varianten von Mixed Methods-Designs und Design-Typologien ein, sowohl generell wie auch in der Psychologie. Der Beitrag schließt mit Überlegungen zu Entwicklungsperspektiven, insbesondere hinsichtlich der Relevanz der qualitativen innerhalb der Mixed Methods-Forschung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Bartholomew, T., & Brown, J. R. (2012). Mixed methods, culture, and psychology: A review of mixed methods in culture-specific psychological research. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research, Practice, Consultation, 1(3), 177–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazeley, P. (2010). Computer-assisted integration of mixed methods data sources and analysis. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Hrsg.), SAGE Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioural research (2. Aufl., S. 431–468). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bazeley, P., & Kemp, L. (2012). Mosaics, triangles, and DNA: Metaphors for integrated analysis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, M. (Hrsg.). (2008a). Advances in mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, M. (2008b). The straw men of the qualitative-quantitative divide and their influence on mixed methods research. In M. Bergman (Hrsg.), Advances in mixed methods research (S. 11–21). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, F. L. (2015). Using mixed methods research designs in health psychology: An illustrated discussion from a pragmatist perspective. British Journal of Heath Psychology, 20, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeije, H., Slagt, M. I., & van Wesel, F. (2013). The contribution of mixed methods research to the field of childhood trauma: A narrative review focused on data integration. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(4), 347–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breuer, F. (2017). Wissenschaftstheoretische Grundlagen qualitativer Methodik in der Psychologie. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Hrsg.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (2. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. R. (1993). A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity, 16, 91–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burzan, N. (2016). Methodenplurale Forschung. Chancen und Probleme von Mixed Methods. Weinheim/Basel: Beltz Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, R., & Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2011). The acceptance of mixed methods in business and management research. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 19(3), 256–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, K. M. T. (2010). Advanced sampling designs in mixed methods research: Current trends and emerging trends in the social and behavioural sciences. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Hrsg.), SAGE Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioural research (2. Aufl., S. 353–378). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Editorial: Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2. Aufl.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J., & Zhang, W. (2009). The application of mixed methods designs to trauma research. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(6), 612–621.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dattilio, F. M., Edwards, D. J. A., & Fishman, D. B. (2010). Case studies within a mixed methods paradigm: Toward a resolution of the alienation between researcher and practitioner in psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 47(4), 427–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act (3. Aufl.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erzberger, C. (1998). Zahlen und Wörter. Die Verbindung quantitativer und qualitativer Daten und Methoden im Forschungsprozess. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eubanks Gambrel, L., & Butler, J. L., VI. (2013). Mixed methods research in marriage and family therapy. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 39(2), 163–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, N., & Fielding, J. (1986). Linking data. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, A. G., & Elsbach, K. (2000). Ethnography and experiment in social psychological theory building: Tactics for integrating qualitative field data with quantitative lab data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 51–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2011). Triangulation. Eine Einführung (3. akt. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U., Fischer, C., Neuber, A., Walter, U., & Schwartz, F. W. (2012). „I can’t prescribe something just because someone asks for it …“ Using mixed methods in the framework of triangulation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franz, A., Worrell, M., & Vögele, C. (2013). Integrating mixed method data in psychological research: Combining Q methodology and questionnaires in a study investigating cultural and psychological influences on sexual behaviour. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(4), 370–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelo, O., Braakmann, D., & Benetka, G. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research: Beyond the debate. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42, 266–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Giddings, L. S. (2006). Mixed-methods research: Positivism dressed in drag? Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(3), 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groeben, N. (2006). Gibt es Wege aus der selbstverschuldeten Irrelevanz des qualitativen Offstream? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 7(4), Art. 34. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0604347. Zugegriffen am 22.07.2015.

  • Groeben, N., Wahl, D., Schlee, J., & Scheele, B. (1988). Forschungsprogramm Subjektive Theorien: Eine Einführung in die Psychologie des reflexiven Subjekts. Tübingen: Francke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, G. (2013). Describing mixed methods research: An alternative to typologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 7(2), 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. (2008). Troubles with triangulation. In M. Bergman (Hrsg.), Advances in mixed methods research (S. 22–36). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, W. E., Creswell, J., Plano Clark, V. L., Petska, K. S., & Creswell, J. D. (2005). Mixed methods research design in counselling psychology. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 52(2), 224–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, S., Moscardino, U., Bermudez, M. R., Zylicz, P., Welles-Nyström, B., Blom, M., Parmar, P., Axia, G., Palacios, J., & Super, C. M. (2006). Mixed methods in international collaborative research: the experiences of the international study of parents, children and schools. Cross-Cultural Research, 40(1), 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haverkamp, B. E., Morrow, S. L., & Ponterotto, J. G. (2005). A time and place for qualitative and mixed methods in counselling psychology research. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 52(2), 123–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayvaert, M., Hannes, K., Maes, B., & Onghena, P. (2013). Critical appraisal of mixed methods studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(7), 302–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, S. (2015). Introduction: Navigating a turbulent research landscape: Working the boundaries, tension, diversity, and contradiction of multimethod and mixed methods inquiry. In S. Hesse-Biber & B. Johnson (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of multi- and mixed-methods research inquiry (S. xxxiii–liii). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. (2010). Handbook of emergent methods. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, S., Rodriguez, D., & Frost, N. A. (2015). A qualitatively driven approach to multimethod and mixed method research inquiry. In S. Hesse-Biber & B. Johnson (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of multi- and mixed-methods research inquiry (S. 3–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, A. (2007). How to add qualitative profundity to quantitative findings in a study on cooperative learning. In P. Mayring, G. L. Huber, L. Gürtler & M. Kiegelmann (Hrsg.), Mixed methodology in psychological research (S. 179–190). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahoda, M., Lazarsfeld, P. M., & Zeisel, H. (1975). Die Arbeitslosen von Marienthal. Ein soziographischer Versuch über die Wirkungen langandauernder Arbeitslosigkeit (7. Aufl.). Suhrkamp: Frankfurt a. M. [Orig. 1933].

    Google Scholar 

  • Janetzko, D. (2001). Processing raw data both the qualitative and quantitative way. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 11. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0101111. Zugegriffen am 22.07.2015.

  • Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B., Meeker, K., Loomis, L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B., McGowan, M. W., & Turner, L. A. (2010). Grounded theory in practice: Is it inherently a mixed method? Research in the Schools, 17(2), 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, U. (2001). Sociological explanations between micro and macro and the integration of qualitative and quantitative methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 5. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs010159. Zugegriffen am 22.07.2015.

  • Kelle, U. (2008). Die Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden in der empirischen Sozialforschung. Theoretische Grundlagen und methodologische Konzepte (2. Aufl.). VS: Wiesbaden.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, U. (2014). Mixed methods. In N. Baur & J. Blasius (Hrsg.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (S. 153–166). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, U., & Erzberger, C. (1999). Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Methoden: methodologische Modelle und ihre Bedeutung für die Forschungspraxis. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 51, 509–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kral, M. J., Wiebe, P., Nisbett, K., Dallas, C., Okalik, L., Enuaraq, N., & Cinotta, J. (2012). Suicide studies and the need for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(3), 236–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroman, M., & Oetzel, J. G. (2003). Exploring the dimensions of organizational assimilation. Creating and validating a measure. Communication Quarterly, 51, 436–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuckartz, U. (2014). Mixed Methods. Methodologie, Forschungsdesigns und Analyseverfahren. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuckartz, U., & Busch, J. (2012). Mixed Methods in der Evaluation. In U. Kuckartz & S. Rädiker (Hrsg.), Erziehungswissenschaftliche Evaluationspraxis. Beispiele – Konzepte – Methoden (S. 14–35). Beltz Juventa: Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuiken, D., & Miall, D. S. (2001). Numerically aided phenomenology: Procedures for investigating categories of experience. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 15. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0101153. Zugegriffen am 22.07.2015.

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1988). Do inquiry paradigms imply inquiry methodologies? In D. M. Fetterman (Hrsg.), Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: The silent scientific revolution (S. 89–115). London: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Hrsg.), Handbook of qualitative research (S. 105–117). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Hrsg.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3. Aufl., S. 191–215). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • von der Lippe, H., Mey, G., & Frommer, J. (Hrsg.). (2011a). Zur Frage der Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Forschung in der Entwicklungs-, Familien- und Pädagogischen Psychologie. Zeitschrift für Qualitative Forschung, 12(1), 3–109. http://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/zqf/issue/view/436. Zugegriffen am 12.04.2017.

  • von der Lippe, H., Mey, G., & Frommer, J. (2011b). Zur Frage der Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Forschung in der Psychologie. Zeitschrift für Qualitative Forschung, 12(1), 3–24. http://www.budrich-journals.de/index.php/zqf/article/view/6094. Zugegriffen am 12.04.2017.

  • Madill, A., & Gough, B. (2008). Qualitative research and its place in psychological science. Psychological Methods, 13(3), 254–271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2006). Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. E., & Loomis, D. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Hrsg.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (S. 241–271). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayoh, J., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2015). Toward a conceptualization of mixed methods phenomenological research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(1), 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2001). Kombination und Integration qualitativer und quantitativer Analyse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Social Research, 2(1), Art. 6. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs010162. Zugegriffen am 22.07.2015.

  • Mayring, P., Huber, L., Gürtler, G. L., & Kiegelmann, M. (Hrsg.). (2007). Mixed methodology in psychological research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D. (2008). Transformative research and evaluation. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, D., Bazeley, P., Bowleg, L., Fielding, N., Maxwell, J., Molina-Azorin, J. F., & Niglas, K. (2016). The future of mixed methods: A five year projection to 2020. http://mmira.wildapricot.org/resources/Documents/MMIRA%20task%20force%20report%20Jan2016%20final.pdf. Zugegriffen am 12.04.2017.

  • Mey, G. (2008). Lehre (in) der Qualitativen Forschung – eine Leerstelle? Journal für Psychologie (Online), 16(1). http://www.journal-fuer-psychologie.de/index.php/jfp/article/view/194/131. Zugegriffen am 12.04.2017.

  • Mey, G., & Mruck, K. (2014). (Hrsg.). Qualitative Forschung: Analysen und Diskussionen – 10 Jahre Berliner Methodentreffen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (2007). Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (2014). Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods. A pragmatic approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2), 120–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M. (2003). Principles of mixed methods and multimethod research design. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Hrsg.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (S. 189–208). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M., & Cheek, J. (2014). Making room for qualitatively-driven mixed-method research. Qualitative Health Research, 24(1), 3–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nastasi, B. K., Hitchcock, J., Sarkar, S., Burkholder, G., Varjas, K., & Jayasena, A. (2007). Mixed methods in intervention research: Theory to adaptation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 164–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nastasi, B. K., Hitchcock, J. H., & Brown, L. M. (2010). An inclusive framework for conceptualizing mixed methods design typologies: Moving toward fully integrated synergistic research models. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Hrsg.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2. Aufl., S. 305–338). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nerlich, B. (2004). Coming full (hermeneutic) circle: The controversy about psychological methods. In Z. Todd, B. Nerlich, S. McKeown & D. D. Clarke (Hrsg.), Mixing methods in psychology. The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice (S. 17–36). New York: Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Cathain, A. (2010). Assessing the quality of mixed methods research: Towards a comprehensive framework. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Hrsg.), SAGE Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioural research (2. Aufl., S. 531–556). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Odağ, Ö. (2007). Wenn Männer von der Liebe lesen und Frauen von Abenteuern. Eine empirische Rezeptionsstudie zur emotionalen Beteiligung von Männern und Frauen beim Lesen narrativer Texte. Lengerich: Pabst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A., & Combs, J. P. (2010). Emergent data analysis techniques in mixed methods research: A synthesis. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Hrsg.), SAGE Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioural research (2. Aufl., S. 397–430). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (4. Aufl.). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phinney, J. S., & Devich-Navarro, M. (1997). Variations in bicultural identification among African American and Mexican American adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 7(1), 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plano Clark, V. L., & Creswell, J. W. (Hrsg.). (2008). The mixed methods reader. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plano Clark, V. L., Garrett, A. L., & Leslie-Pelecky, D. L. (2010). Applying three strategies for integrating qualitative and quantitative databases in a mixed methods study of a non-traditional graduate education program. Field Methods, 22(2), 154–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Povee, K., & Roberts, L. D. (2015). Attitudes towards mixed methods research in psychology: the best of both worlds? International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(1), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, H., Mihalas, S., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Suldo, S., & Daley, C. E. (2008). Mixed methods research in school psychology: A mixed methods investigation of the trends in the literature. Psychology in the Schools, 45(4), 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, D. L., & Frommer, J. (2015). Applications of qualitative and mixed methods counseling and psychotherapy research. In O. C. Gelo, A. Pritz & B. Rieken (Hrsg.), Psychotherapy research. Foundations, process, and outcome (S. 429–454). Wien: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossman, G. B., & Wilson, B. L. (1985). Numbers and words: Combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 627–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, M. (2000). Combining qualitative and quantitative sampling, data collection and analysis techniques in mixed-method studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 246–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreier, M. (2017). Kontexte qualitativer Sozialforschung: Arts-Based Research, Mixed Methods und Emergent Methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(2), Art. 6. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs170263. Zugegriffen am 12.04.2017.

  • Schreier, M., & Breuer, F. (2017). Lehren und Lernen qualitativer Forschungsmethoden in der Psychologie. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Hrsg.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (2. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreier, M., & Echterhoff, G. (2013). Mixed Methods. In W. Hussy, M. Schreier & G. Echterhoff (Hrsg.), Forschungsmethoden in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften (2. Aufl., S. 285–309). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreier, M., & Fielding, N. (Hrsg.) (2001). Qualitative and quantitative research. Conjunctions and divergencies. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/26. Zugegriffen am 22.07.2015.

  • Schweizer, K., Paechter, M., & Weidenmann, B. (2007). Coherence in knowledge communication: How do online groups communicate? In P. Mayring, G. L. Huber, L. Gürtler & M. Kiegelmann (Hrsg.), Mixed methodology in psychological research (S. 101–112). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank, G. (2007). How to tap the full potential of qualitative research by applying qualitative methods. In P. Mayring, G. L. Huber, L. Gürtler & M. Kiegelmann (Hrsg.), Mixed methodology in psychological research (S. 7–13). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., White, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherf, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment. Norman: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange. http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Sherif/. Zugegriffen am 22.07.2015 [Orig. 1954].

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, A. C. (2015). Developing mixed methods research in sport and exercise psychology: Critical reflections on five points of controversy. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 16, 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Cressfield, J. (2008). Editorial: Mixed methodology across disciplines. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 3–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2008). Quality of inferences in mixed methods research: Calling for an integrative framework. In M. Bergman (Hrsg.), Advances in mixed methods research (S. 101–119). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (Hrsg.). (2010). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2. Aufl.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C., & Sines, M. C. (2012). Utilizing mixed methods in psychological research. In I. B. Weiner, J. A. Schinka & W. F. Velicer (Hrsg.), Handbook of psychology. Research methods in psychology (Bd. 2, S. 428–450). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling. A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomae, H. (1959). Forschungsmethoden der Entwicklungspsychologie. In H. Thomae (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Psychologie, Band 3: Entwicklungspsychologie (S. 46–75). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Z., & Nerlich, B. (2004). Future directions. In Z. Todd, B. Nerlich, S. McKeown & D. D. Clarke (Hrsg.), Mixing methods in psychology. The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice (S. 325–332). New York: Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Z., Nerlich, B., & McKeown, S. (2004a). Introduction. In Z. Todd, B. Nerlich, S. McKeown & D. D. Clarke (Hrsg.), Mixing methods in psychology. The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice (S. 3–16). New York: Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, Z., Nerlich, B., McKeown, S., & Clarke, D. D. (Hrsg.). (2004b). Mixing methods in psychology. The integration of qualitative and quantitative methods in theory and practice. New York: Psychology Press/Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, D. L., & Szalacha, L. A. (1999). Dimensions of desire. Bridging qualitative and quantitative methods in a study of female adolescent sexuality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 7–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ungar, M., & Liebenberg, L. (2011). Assessing resilience across cultures using mixed methods: Construction of the child and youth resilience measure. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(2), 126–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waszak, C., & Sines, M. C. (2003). Mixed methods in psychological research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Hrsg.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (S. 557–576). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Way, N., Stauber, H. Y., Nakkula, M. J., & London, P. (1994). Depression and substance use in two divergent high school cultures. A quantitative and qualitative analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 23(3), 331–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggings, B. J. (2011). Confronting the dilemma of mixed methods. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 31, 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. N., Judge, A. B., Hill, C. E., & Hofmann, M. A. (1997). Experience of novice therapists in prepracticum: Trainees’, clients’ and supervisors’ perceptions of therapists’ personal reactions and management strategies. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 390–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, H., Weisner, T., Kalil, A., & Way, N. (2008). Mixing qualitative and quantitative research in developmental science: Uses and methodological choices. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 344–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W., & Watanabe-Galloway, S. (2014). Using mixed methods effectively in prevention science: Designs, procedures, and examples. Prevention Science, 15, 654–662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychology and Methods, Jacobs University Bremen, Campus Ring 1, 28759, Bremen, Deutschland

    Margrit Schreier

  2. Touro College Berlin, Am Rupenhorn 5, 14055, Berlin, Deutschland

    Özen Odağ

Authors
  1. Margrit Schreier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Özen Odağ
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margrit Schreier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Angewandte Humanwissenschaften, Hochschule Magdeburg-Stendal Angewandte Humanwissenschaften, Stendal, Germany

    Günter Mey

  2. CeDiS, Freie Universität Berlin CeDiS, Berlin, Germany

    Katja Mruck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this entry

Cite this entry

Schreier, M., Odağ, Ö. (2017). Mixed Methods-Forschung in der Psychologie. In: Mey, G., Mruck, K. (eds) Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18387-5_22-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18387-5_22-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-18387-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-18387-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Psychologie

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Mixed Methods
    Published:
    17 January 2020

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18387-5_22-2

  2. Original

    Mixed Methods-Forschung in der Psychologie
    Published:
    03 August 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18387-5_22-1

Search

Navigation