Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Crowdsourcing als neuartige Form der Arbeitsorganisation und des Innovierens

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbuch Innovationsforschung

  • 530 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der Artikel widmet sich der Frage, inwiefern Crowdsourcing eine Innovation ist. Es wird erstens gezeigt, dass im Rahmen von Crowdwork die Organisation bestimmter Arbeitsprozesse, vor allem hinsichtlich der Zusammensetzung der Erwerbstätigen, der Arbeitsinhalte, der Steuerungs- und Kontrollmechanismen, der Flexibilität und der Gratifikation, erneuert wird. Zweitens weichen crowdsourcing-basierte Innovationen hinsichtlich der beteiligten Akteure, des Anwendungsfeldes, der Entscheidungsmechanismen und des Resultates von klassischen Varianten ab.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Keineswegs ist Crowdvoting der einzige Schließungsmechanismus im Rahmen crowdsourcing-basierten Innovierens. So finden sich daneben beispielsweise auch die einfache interne Bewertung der Ideen und die Auswahl der Ideen durch interne oder externe Experten als weitere Modi (Mergel 2015).

Literatur

  • Afuah, Allan, und Christopher L. Tucci. 2012. Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Managment Review 37(3): 355–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali-Hassan, Hossam, und Hesham Allam. 2016. Comparing crowdsourcing initiatives: Toward a typology development. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences Revue 33(4): 318–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ARD/ZDF-Onlinestudie. 2016. Onlinenutzung. http://www.ard-zdf-onlinestudie.de/index.php?id=561. Zugegriffen am 10.04.2018.

  • Armisen, Albert, und Ann Majchrzak. 2015. Tapping the innovative business potential of innovation contests. Business Horizons 58(4): 389–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battistella, Cinzia, und Fabio Nonino. 2012. Open innovation web-based platforms: The impact of different forms of motivation on collaboration. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice 14(4): 557–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayus, Berry L. 2013. Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell Idea Storm community. Management Science 59(1): 226–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boes, Andreas, Tobias Kämpf, Barbara Langes, Thomas Lühr, und Steffen Steglich. 2014. Cloudworking und die Zukunft der Arbeit. Kritische Analysen am Beispiel der Strategie „Generation Open“ von IBM. Kassel: Beratungsstelle für Technologiefolgen und Qualifizierung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogers, Marcel, und Joel West. 2012. Managing distributed innovation: Strategic utilization of open and user innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management 21(1): 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, Kevin J., und Karim R. Lakhani. 2014. „Open“ disclosure of innovations, incentives and follow-on Reuse: Theory on processes of cumulative innovation and a field experiment in computational biology. Research Policy 44(1): 4–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabham, Daren C. 2012. The myth of the amateur crowds. Information, Communication & Society 15(3): 394–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, Tanja. 2015. Neue Anforderungen und Belastungen durch digitale und mobile Technologien. WSI-Mitteilungen 68(3): 187–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, Henry W. 2003. Open innovation. The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Chanwoo, und Sungjoo Lee. 2015. How firms can get ideas from users for sustainable business innovation. Sustainability 7(12): 16039–16059. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71215802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, Roy Y. J., Yannig Roth, und Jean-François Lemoine. 2015. The impact of culture on creativity: How cultural tightness and cultural distance affect global innovation crowdsourcing work. Administrative Science Quarterly 60(2): 189–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Jeffrey R., Elizabeth E. Richard, und Kathryn E. Keeton. 2015. Open innovation at NASA: A new business model for advancing human health and performance innovations. Research-Technology Management 58(3): 52–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djelassi, Souad, und Isabelle Decoopman. 2013. Customers’ participation in product development through crowdsourcing: Issues and implications. Industrial Marketing Management 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.05.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, John Qi, und Weifang Wu. 2015. Business value of social media technologies: Evidence from online user innovation communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2015.04.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felin, Teppo, Karim R. Lakhani, und Michael L. Tushman. 2017. Firms, crowds, and innovation. Strategic Organization 15(2): 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghezzi, Antonio, Donata Gabelloni, Antonella Martini, und Angelo Natalicchio. 2017. Crowdsourcing: A review and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Garcia, Yejun, D. Enrique Xu, und J. Ribeiro-Soriano. 2015. Crowdsourcing, innovation and firm performance. Management Decision 53(6): 1158–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Bin, Zhu Wang, Yu Zhiwen, Yu Wang, Neil Y. Yen, Runhe Huang, und Xingshe Zhou. 2015. Mobile crowd sensing and computing. ACM Computing Surveys 48(1): 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hippel, Eric von. 1994. „Sticky information“ and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science 40(4): 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hippel, Eric von. 2005. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoornaert, Steven, Michel Ballings, Edward C. Malthouse, und Dirk Van den Poel. 2017. Identifying new product ideas: Waiting for the wisdom of the crowd or screening ideas in real time. Journal of Product Innovation Management 34(5): 580–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton, John Joseph, und Lydia B. Chilton. 2009. The labor economics of paid crowdsourcing. In EC 10 proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on electronic commerce, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 209–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, Mokter, und Ilkka Kauranen. 2015. Crowdsourcing: A comprehensive literature review. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal 8(1): 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, Jeff. 2006. The rise of crowdsourcing. https://www.wired.com/2006/06/crowds/. Zugegriffen am 10.04.2018.

  • Huang, Yan, Param Vir Singh, und Kannan Srinivasan. 2014. Crowdsourcing new product ideas under consumer learning. Management Science 60(9): 2138–2159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleemann, Frank, G. Günter Voß, und Kerstin Rieder. 2008. Un(der)paid innovators. The commercial utilization of consumer work through crowdsourcing. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 4(1): 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensson, Per, Jonas Matthing, und Niklas Johansson. 2008. Key strategies for the successful involvement of customers in the co-creation of new technology-based services. International Journal of Service Industry Management 19(4): 474–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Kristine M. 2016. The rise of the „gig economy“ and implications for understanding work and workers. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leimeister, Jan Marco, und Shkodran Zogaj. 2013. Neue Arbeitsorganisation durch Crowdsourcing. Eine Literaturstudie. Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leimeister, Jan Marco, und Shkodran Zogaj. 2016. Crowd Worker in Deutschland: Eine empirische Studie zum Arbeitsumfeld auf externen Crowdsourcing-Plattformen. Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, Thomas, und Christian Landau. 2015. Winners, losers, and deniers: Self-selection in crowd innovation contests and the roles of motivation, creativity, and skills. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 37(3): 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, Arvind, Ann Majchrzak, und Rebecca M. Niemiec. 2017. Using public crowds for open strategy formulation: Mitigating the risks of knowledge gaps. Long Range Planning 50(3): 397–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mergel, Ines. 2015. Opening government: Designing open innovation processes to collaborate with external problem solvers. Social Science Computer Review 33(5): 599–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollick, Ethan, und Venkat Kuppuswamy. 2016. Crowdfunding: Evidence on the democratization of startup funding. In Revolutionizing innovation: Users, communities and open innovation, Hrsg. Dietmar Harhoff und Karim R. Lakhani, 537–559. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montelisciani, Gabriele, Donata Gabelloni, Giacomo Tazzini, und Gualtiero Fantoni. 2014. Skills and wills: The keys to identify the right team in collaborative innovation platforms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26(6): 687–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomerie, Johanna, und Samuel Roscoe. 2013. Owning the consumer: Getting to the core of the Apple business model. Accounting Forum: Advancing the Interdisciplinary and Global Connection of Accounting Research 37(4): 290–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • mturk tracker. 2017. Top-1000 Requesters, report for March 31, 2017 to April 30, 2017. http://www.mturk-tracker.com/#/toprequesters. Zugegriffen am 10.04.2018.

  • Nakatsu, Robbie T., Elissa B. Grossman, und Charalambos L. Iacovou. 2014. A taxonomy of crowdsourcing based on task complexity. Journal of Information Science 40(6): 823–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natalicchio, Angelo, Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli, und Claudio Garavelli. 2017. Innovation problems and search for solutions in crowdsourcing platforms – A simulation approach. Technovation 64–65:28–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papsdorf, Christian. 2009. Wie Surfen zu Arbeit wird. Crowdsourcing im Web 2.0. Frankfurt a. M./New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papsdorf, Christian. 2016. The value of crowdfunding. The significance of community-financed projects beyond the act of financing. In Open tourism – Open innovation, crowdsourcing and collaborative consumption challenging the tourism industry, Hrsg. Roman Egger, Igor Gula und Dominik Walcher, 121–136. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, Sabine. 2004. Arbeitsvermögen. Ein Schlüssel zur Analyse (reflexiver) Informatisierung. Wiesbaden: Verlag Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poetz, Marion K., und Martin Schreier. 2012. The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas. Journal of Product Innovation Management 29(2): 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Gordon B., und William M. Jettinghoff. 2016. Using Amazon Mechanical Turk and other compensated crowdsourcing sites. Business Horizons 59(4): 391–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, Fiona Maria, Walter Buchinger, Oliver Gassmann, und Marianna Obrist. 2012. Crowdsourcing: Leveraging innovation through online idea competitions. Research-Technology Management 55(3): 32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, Victor P., Benedikt Langner, und Jonathan Sims. 2016. Dominant communities and dominant designs: Community-based innovation in the context of the technology life cycle. Strategic Organization 15(2): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simula, Henri, und Tuomas Ahola. 2014. A network perspective on idea and innovation crowdsourcing in industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management 43(3): 400–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Soziologie, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Deutschland

    Christian Papsdorf

Authors
  1. Christian Papsdorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Papsdorf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst für Soziologie Campus Westend PEG, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Inst für Soziologie Campus Westend PEG, Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany

    Birgit Blättel-Mink

  2. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin Institut für Soziologie, Berlin, Germany

    Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer

  3. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin Institut für Soziologie, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Arnold Windeler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Papsdorf, C. (2019). Crowdsourcing als neuartige Form der Arbeitsorganisation und des Innovierens. In: Blättel-Mink, B., Schulz-Schaeffer, I., Windeler, A. (eds) Handbuch Innovationsforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17671-6_56-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17671-6_56-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17671-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17671-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Naturwissenschaften

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation