Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Innovation und Organisation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Innovationsforschung

  • 750 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Beziehung zwischen Innovation und Organisation ist widersprüchlich: Organisation beschränkt Innovation und ermöglicht sie gleichzeitig dadurch. In diesem Beitrag rezipieren wir aktuelle prozessorientierte Ansätze in der Organisationsforschung, die diese Beziehung auf unterschiedliche Arten und Weisen adressieren. Dabei argumentieren wir, dass Innovation weder allein von besonders kreativen Individuen noch von bestimmten Organisationsstrukturen abhängt, sondern von situativen, kollektiven Praktiken, welche durch Organisation unterstützt werden können.

Wir danken Robert Bauer und Jörg Sydow sowie den Herausgeberinnen und Herausgebern für hilfreiche Anmerkungen bei der Entwicklung dieses Texts. Ebenso danken wir der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) für die Bereitstellung von Forschungsmitteln für diese Arbeit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Aiken, Michael, und Jerald Hage. 1971. The organic organization and innovation. Sociology 5(1): 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, Howard E., und C. Marlene Fiol. 1994. Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review 19(4): 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, Teresa M. 1996. Creativity in context. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Neil, Kristina Potočnik, und Jing Zhou. 2014. Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management 40(5): 1297–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ban, Thomas A. 2006. The role of serendipity in drug discovery. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 8(3): 335–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, Daved, und Stefan Meisiek. 2015. Discovering the business studio. Journal of Management Education 39(1): 153–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Robert M., und Thomas Gegenhuber. 2015. Crowdsourcing: Global search and the twisted roles of consumers and producers. Organization 22(5): 661–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Robert M., und Thomas Gegenhuber. 2017. Crowdsourcing: Intermediäre und die Rationalisierung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. In Leistung und Gerechtigkeit – Das umstrittene Versprechen des Kapitalismus, Hrsg. Brigitte Aulenbacher, Maria Dammayr, Klaus Dörre, Wolfgang Menz, Birgit Riegraf und Harald Wolf, 355–373. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitz, Janet, und Maryann Feldman. 2011. The mechanisms of collaboration in inventive teams: Composition, social networks, and geography. Research Policy 40(1): 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blättel-Mink, Birgit, und Raphael Menez. 2006. Kompendium der Innovationsforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boes, Andreas, Tobias Kämpf, Barbara Langes, und Thomas Lühr. 2015. Landnahme im Informationsraum. Neukonstituierung gesellschaftlicher Arbeit in der „digitalen Gesellschaft“. WSI-Mitteilungen 68(2): 77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boland, Richard J., Kalle Lyytinen, und Youngjin Yoo. 2007. Wakes of innovation in project networks: The case of digital 3-D representations in architecture, engineering, and construction. Organization Science 18(4): 631–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun-Thürmann, Holger. 2005. Innovation. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, Michael. 1979. Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, Robert A. 1991. Intraorganizational ecology of strategy making and organizational adaptation: Theory and field research. Organization Science 2(3): 239–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgelman, Robert A. 2002. Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in. Administrative Science Quarterly 47:325–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, Tom, und George M. Stalker. 1961. The management of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, Henry W. 2003. Open innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Jin Nam, und Jae Yoon Chang. 2009. Innovation implementation in the public sector: An integration of institutional and collective dynamics. Journal of Applied Psychology 94(1): 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Hoon-Seok, und Leigh Thompson. 2005. Old wine in a new bottle: Impact of membership change on group creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 98:121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, John K., und Marta Gasparin. 2016. Managing controversies in the fuzzy front end. Creativity and Innovation Management 25:500–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohendet, Patrick, und Laurent Simon. 2015. Introduction to the special issue on creativity in innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review 5(7): 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohendet, Patrick, Patrick Llerena, und Laurent Simon. 2014. The routinization of creativity: Lessons from the case of a video-game creative powerhouse. Journal of Economics and Statistics 234(2–3): 120–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, Mary M., und Marina Apaydin. 2010. A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies 47(6): 1154–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, Mihalyi. 1996. Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, Miguel Pina, Steward R. Clegg, und Sandro Mendonça. 2010. On serendipity and organizing. European Management Journal 28(5): 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, Richard M., und James G. March. 1963. A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Lee N., Jerome D. Davis, und Karin Hoisl. 2013. Leisure time invention. Organization Science 24(5): 1439–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeFillippi, Robert, Gernot Grabher, und Candace Jones. 2007. Introduction to paradoxes of creativity: Managerial and organizational challenges in the cultural economy. Journal of Organizational Behavior 28(5): 511–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhanaraj, Charles, und Arvind Parkhe. 2006. Orchestrating innovation networks. Academy of Management Review 31(3): 659–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J., und Walter W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited – Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2): 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobusch, Leonhard, und Dennis Schoeneborn. 2015. Fluidity, identity, and organizationality: The communicative constitution of Anonymous. Journal of Management Studies 52(8): 1005–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobusch, Leonhard, und Elke Schüßler. 2012. Theorizing path dependence: A review of positive feedback mechanisms in technology markets, regional clusters, and organizations. Industrial and Corporate Change 22(3): 617–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolata, Ulrich. 2008. Das Internet und die Transformation der Musikindustrie. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 18(3): 344–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Martha S., und Brian T. Pentland. 2003. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly 48(1): 94–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortwengel, Johann, Elke Schüßler, und Jörg Sydow. 2017. Studying organizational creativity as process: Fluidity or duality? Creativity and Innovation Management 26(1): 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Martinez, Marian. 2015. Solver engagement in knowledge sharing in crowdsourcing communities: Exploring the link to creativity. Research Policy 44:1419–1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, Raghu, und Peter Karnøe. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy 32(2): 277–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, Raghu, Sanjay Jain, und Philipp Tuertscher. 2008. Designing for incompleteness and incomplete by design. Organization Studies 29(3): 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, Raghu, Joel Gehman, und Arun Kumaraswamy. 2011. Complexity arrangements for sustained innovation: Lessons from 3M Corporation. Organization Studies 32(6): 737–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, Raghu, Philipp Tuertscher, und Andrew H. Van de Ven. 2013. Perspectives on innovation processes. Academy of Management Annals 7(1): 775–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, Raghu, und Marja Turunen. 2017. The banality of organizational innovations: Embracing the substance – process duality. Innovation 19(1): 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, Raghu, Joel Gehman, Arun Kumaraswamy, und Philipp Tuertscher. 2017. From the process of innovation to innovation as process. In The SAGE handbook of process organization studies, Hrsg. Ann Langley und Haridimos Tsoukas, 451–465. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, Scott W., und Luke H. Cashen. 2002. A multidimensional examination of slack and its impact on innovation. Journal of Managerial Issues 14(1): 68–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, Jennifer M. 2007. Creativity in organizations. Academy of Management Annals 1(1): 439–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabher, Gernot, und Oliver Ibert. 2014. Distance as asset. Knowledge collaboration in hybrid virtual communities. Journal of Economic Geography 14(1): 97–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Bronwhyn H., und Nathan Rosenberg. 2010. Handbook of the economics of innovation. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon, Andrew B., und Beth A. Bechky. 2006. When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science 17(4): 484–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon, Andrew B., und J. Yellowlees Douglas. 2001. When innovations meet institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light. Administrative Science Quarterly 46(3): 476–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Spence H., und Elizabeth D. Rouse. 2014. Let’s dance! Elastic coordination in creative group work: A qualitative study of modern dancers. Academy of Management Journal 57(5): 1256–1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegl, Martin, und Praveen K. Parboteeah. 2007. Creativity in innovative projects: How teamwork matters. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 24(1): 148–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegl, Martin, Michael Gibbert, und David Mazursky. 2008. Financial constraints in innovation projects: When is less more? Research Policy 37(8): 1382–1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, Jeff. 2008. Crowdsourcing – Why the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. New York: Three Rivers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hülsheger, Ute R., Neil Anderson, und Jesus F. Salgado. 2009. Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology 94:1128–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan-Narasimhan, Rangapriya. 2014. Organizational ingenuity in nascent innovations: Gaining resources and legitimacy through unconventional actions. Organization Studies 35(4): 483–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karim, Samina. 2009. Business unit reorganization and innovation in new product markets. Management Science 55:1237–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoblauch, Hubert. 2016. Kommunikatives Handeln, das Neue und die Innovationsgesellschaft. In Innovationsgesellschaft heute, Hrsg. Werner Rammert, Arnold Windeler, Hubert Knoblauch und Michael Hutter, 111–131. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2009. The synthetic situation: Interactionism for a global world. Symbolic Interaction 32(1): 61–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampel, Joseph, Benson Honig, und Israel Drori. 2014. Organizational ingenuity: Concept, processes and strategies. Organization Studies 35(4): 465–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, Ann, Clive Smallman, Haridimos Tsoukas, und Andrew Van de Ven. 2013. Process studies of change in organization and management: Unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal 56(1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 2000. Organisation und Entscheidung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mangematin, Vincent, Jonathan Sapsed, und Elke Schüßler. 2014. Disassembly and reassembly: An introduction to the special issue on digital technology and creative industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 83:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, James G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2(1): 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, James G., und Herbert A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, Ellen C., und Fransie Terblanche. 2003. Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management 6(1): 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, Nitin, und Ranjay Gulati. 1996. Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal 39(5): 1245–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, David. 2012. Creative projects: A less routine approach toward getting new things done. Organization Science 23(6): 1571–1592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Amalya L. 2009. Networks for learning and knowledge creation in biotechnology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, Günther. 2016. Innovation: In Ketten tanzen. In Innovationsgesellschaft heute. Perspektive, Felder und Fälle, Hrsg. Werner Rammert, Arnold Windeler, Hubert Knoblauch und Michael Hutter, 237–248. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, Günther, und Jörg Sydow. 2018. Dancing in chains: Creative practices in/of organizations. Organization Studies 39(7): 899–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W., Kenneth W. Koput, und Laurel Smith-Doerr. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41(1): 116–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, Sebastian, und Julian Birkinshaw. 2008. Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management 34(3): 375–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammert, Werner. 2010. Die Innovationen der Gesellschaft. In Soziale Innovation: Auf dem Weg zu einem postindustriellen Innovationsparadigma, Hrsg. Jürgen Howaldt und Heike Jacobsen, 21–51. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, Andreas. 2016. Das Kreativitätsdispositiv und die sozialen Regime des Neuen. In Innovationsgesellschaft heute. Perspektive, Felder und Fälle, Hrsg. Werner Rammert, Arnold Windeler, Hubert Knoblauch und Michael Hutter, 133–153. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rüling, Charles-Clemens, und Raffi Duymedjian. 2014. Digital bricolage: Resources and coordination in the production of digital visual effects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 83:98–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapsed, Jonathan, und Feichin Ted Tschang. 2014. Art is long, innovation is short: Lessons from the Renaissance and the digital age. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 83:127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Suntje, Verena Brinks, und Sascha Brinkhoff. 2014. Innovation and creativity labs in Berlin. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie 58(1): 232–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schüßler, Elke, Carolin Decker, und Frank Lerch. 2013. Networks of clusters: A governance perspective. Industry and Innovation 20(4): 357–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavich, Barbara, und Silviya Svejenova. 2016. Managing creativity: A critical examination, synthesis, and new frontiers. European Management Review 13(4): 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonenshein, Scott. 2014. How organizations foster the creative use of resources. Academy of Management Journal 57(3): 814–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonenshein, Scott. 2016. Routines and creativity: From dualism to duality. Organization Science 27(3): 739–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svejenova, Silviya, Carmelo Mazza, und Marcel Planellas. 2007. Cooking up change in haute cuisine: Ferran Adrià as an institutional entrepreneur. Journal of Organizational Behavior 28(5): 539–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, Michael L., und Charles A. O’Reilly III. 1996. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review 38(4): 8–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walgenbach, Peter. 2014. Organisation und Innovation. In Innovationen. Theorien, Konzepte und Methoden der Innovationsforschung, Hrsg. Wolfgang Burr, 92–116. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1980 [1922]. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck).

    Google Scholar 

  • West, Michael A. 1990. The social psychology of innovation in groups. In Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies, Hrsg. Michael A. West und James L. Farr, 309–333. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly 36(2): 269–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, Richard W., John E. Sawyer, und Ricky W. Griffin. 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review 18(2): 293–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Linz, Österreich

    Elke Schüßler & Benjamin Schiemer

Authors
  1. Elke Schüßler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Benjamin Schiemer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elke Schüßler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst für Soziologie Campus Westend PEG, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Inst für Soziologie Campus Westend PEG, Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany

    Birgit Blättel-Mink

  2. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin Institut für Soziologie, Berlin, Germany

    Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer

  3. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin Institut für Soziologie, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Arnold Windeler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Schüßler, E., Schiemer, B. (2019). Innovation und Organisation. In: Blättel-Mink, B., Schulz-Schaeffer, I., Windeler, A. (eds) Handbuch Innovationsforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17671-6_30-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17671-6_30-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17671-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17671-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Naturwissenschaften

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation