Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbuch Innovationsforschung pp 1–18Cite as

Sektoraler Wandel durch Technik

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Der Aufsatz geht der Frage nach, wie sich Wirtschaftssektoren unter dem Eindruck grundlegend neuer technologischer Möglichkeiten, die dort ein enormes Entwicklungs- und Einsatzpotenzial haben, verändern und wie sich ein solcher sektoraler Wandel durch Technik analysieren lässt. Dazu werden zunächst ausgewählte Zugänge zum Thema und anschließend forschungspragmatische Überlegungen zur Untersuchung technikgeprägten sektoralen Wandels vorgestellt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Literatur

  • Ahuja, Gautam, Curba M. Lampert, und Vivek Tandon. 2008. Moving beyond Schumpeter: Management research on the determinants of technological innovation. The Academy of Management Annals 2(1): 1–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athanasopolou, Alexia, Harry Bouwman, Fatemeh Nikayin, und Mark de Reuver. 2016. The disruptive impact of digitalization on the automotive ecosystem: A research agenda on business models, platforms and consumer issues. In 29th Bled eConference ‚Digital Economy‘. Bled: Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breschi, Stefano, und Franco Malerba. 1997. Sectoral innovation systems: Technological regimes, schumpeterian dynamics, and spatial boundaries. In Systems of innovation. Technologies, institutions and organizations, Hrsg. Charles Edquist, 130–156. London/Washington: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, Timothy F., und Franco Malerba. 1999. Industrial dynamics and the evolution of firms’ and nations’ competitive capabilities in the world computer industry. In Sources of industrial leadership. Studies of seven industries, Hrsg. David C. Mowery und Richard R. Nelson, 79–132. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, Tom, und G. M. Stalker. 1961 (rev. version 1994). The management of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandy, Rajesh K., und Gerard J. Tellis. 2000. The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing 64(3): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Clayton M. 1997. The innovator’s dilemma. Harvard: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloodt, Myriam, John Hagedoorn, und Nadine Roijakkers. 2010. Inter-firm R&D networks in the global software industry: An overview of major trends and patterns. Business History 52(1): 120–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesley M., und Daniel A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35:128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J., und Walter W. Powell. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2): 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolata, Ulrich. 2003. Unternehmen Technik. Akteure, Interaktionsmuster und strukturelle Kontexte der Technikentwicklung: Ein Theorierahmen. Berlin: Edition Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolata, Ulrich. 2008. Technologische Innovationen und sektoraler Wandel. Eingriffstiefe, Adaptionsfähigkeit, Transformationsmuster: Ein analytischer Ansatz. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 37(1): 44–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolata, Ulrich. 2009. Technological innovations and sectoral change. Transformative capacity, adaptability, patterns of change. An analytical framework. Research Policy 38(6): 1066–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolata, Ulrich. 2011. Wandel durch Technik. Eine Theorie soziotechnischer Transformation. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolata, Ulrich. 2013. The transformative capacity of new technologies. A theory of sociotechnical change. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dolata, Ulrich. 2018. Internet companies: Market concentration, competition and power. In Collectivity and power on the internet. A sociological perspective, Hrsg. Ulrich Dolata und Jan-Felix Schrape, 85–108. Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dolata, Ulrich, und Jan-Felix Schrape, Hrsg. 2013. Medien in transformation. Radikaler Wandel als schrittweise Rekonfiguration. In Internet, Mobile Devices und die Transformation der Medien. Radikaler Wandel als schrittweise Rekonfiguration, 9–36. Berlin: Edition Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, Giovanni, Christopher Freeman, Richard Nelson, Gerald Silverberg, und Luc Soete, Hrsg. 1988. Technical change and economic theory. London/New York: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, Stephen. 2008. Harnessing the hackers: The emergence and exploitation of outlaw innovation. Research Policy 37:177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Christopher, und Carlota Perez. 1988. Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In Technical change and economic theory, Hrsg. Giovanni Dosi, Christopher Freeman, Richard Nelson, Gerald Silverberg und Luc Soete, 38–66. London/New York: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, Frank W. 2007. Analyzing the breakthrough of rock’n’roll (1930–1970). Multi-regime interaction and reconfiguration in the multi-level perspective. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 74:1411–1431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, Frank, und René Kemp. 2007. Dynamics in socio-technical systems: Typology of change processes and contrasting case studies. Technology in Society 29:441–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels, Frank W., und Johan Schot. 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36:399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giachetti, Claudio, und Gianluca Marchi. 2017. Successive changes in leadership in the worldwide mobile phone industry: The role of windows of opportunity and firms’ competitive action. Research Policy 46:352–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, Michael T., und John Freeman. 1977. The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology 83:929–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, Michael T., und John Freeman. 1984. Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review 49:149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Rebecca, und Kim B. Clark. 1990. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of existing firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Rebecca, Luigi Orsenigo, und Gary P. Pisano. 1999. The pharmaceutical industry and the revolution in molecular biology: Interactions among scientific, institutional, and organizational change. In Sources of industrial leadership. Studies of seven industries, Hrsg. David C. Mowery und Richard R. Nelson, 267–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, J. Rogers. 2000. Doing institutional analysis: Implications for the study of innovations. Review of International Political Economy 7:595–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, Herbert. 1991. Industrial governance structures, innovation strategies, and the case of Japan: Sectoral or cross-national comparative analysis? International Organization 4:453–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küng, Lucy, Robert G. Picard, und Ruth Towse, Hrsg. 2008. The internet and the mass media. Los Angeles/London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leblebici, Huseyin, Gerald R. Salancik, Anne Copay, und Tom King. 1991. Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the U.S. radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 36(3): 333–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Keun, und Franco Malerba. 2017. Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems. Research Policy 46:338–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüdtke, Nico. 2016. Die Praxis der Innovationsforschung – im Spannungsfeld von Wissenschaft, Ökonomie, Steuerung und Organisation. Soziologische Revue 39(1): 74–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, James, und Kathleen Thelen, Hrsg. 2010. A theory of gradual institutional change. In Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power, 1–37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, Franco. 2002. Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy 31: 247–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, Franco. 2004. Sectoral systems of innovation. Concepts, issues and analyses of six major sectors in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, Franco. 2005. Sectoral systems of innovation: A framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14(1–2): 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, Franco. 2006. Innovation and the evolution of industries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 16:3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, Franco, und Richard R. Nelson. 2012. Economic development as a learning process: Variation across sectoral systems. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, Mariana. 2013. The entrepreneurial state. Debunking public vs. private sector myths. London/New York/Delhi: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellahi, Kamel, und Adrian Wilkinson. 2004. Organizational failure: A critique of recent research and a proposed integrative framework. International Journal of Management Reviews 5/6(1): 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, David C. 1999. The computer software industry. In Sources of industrial leadership. Studies of seven industries, Hrsg. David C. Mowery und Richard R. Nelson, 133–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, David C., und Richard R. Nelson. 1999. Sources of industrial leadership. Studies of seven industries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahoney, Siobhán, und Beth A. Bechky. 2008. Boundary organizations: Enabling collaboration among unexpected allies. Administrative Science Quarterly 53(3): 422–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, Carlota, und Luc Soete. 1988. Catching up in technology: Entry barriers and windows of opportunity. In Technical change and economic theory, Hrsg. Giovanni Dosi, Christopher Freeman, Richard Nelson, Gerald Silverberg und Luc Soete, 458–479. London/New York: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popitz, Heinrich. 1992. Der Aufbruch zur Artifiziellen Gesellschaft. Zur Anthropologie der Technik. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammert, Werner. 2010. Die Innovationen der Gesellschaft. In Soziale Innovation. Auf dem Weg zu einem postindustriellen Innovationsparadigma, Hrsg. Jürgen Howaldt und Heike Jacobsen, 21–51. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rip, Arie, und René Kemp. 1998. Technological change. In Human choice and climate change. Volume two: Resources and technology, Hrsg. Steve Rayner und Elizabeth L. Malone, 328–399. Columbus: Batelle Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roijakkers, Nadine, und John Hagedoorn. 2006. Inter-firm partnering in pharmaceutical biotechnology since 1975: Trends, patterns, and networks. Research Policy 35:431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, Frank T. 2001. Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal 22(6/7): 687–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, Georg, und Jörg Sydow. 2010. Organizing for fluidity? Dilemmas of new organizational forms. Organization Science 21(6): 1251–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adrian, Andy Stirling, und Frans Berkhout. 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy 34:1491–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang, und Kathleen Thelen, Hrsg. 2005. Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In Beyond continuity. Institutional change in advanced political economies, 1–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werle, Raymund. 2005. Institutionelle Analyse technischer Innovation. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 57(2): 308–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werle, Raymund. 2012. Institutions and systems: Analysing technical innovation processes from an institutional perspective. In Innovation policy and governance in high-tech industries. The complexity of coordination, Hrsg. Johannes Bauer, Achim Lang und Volker Schneider, 23–47. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Windeler, Arnold. 2016. Reflexive innovation. Zur Innovation in der radikalisierten Moderne. In Innovationsgesellschaft heute. Perspektiven, Felder und Fälle, Hrsg. Werner Rammert, Arnold Windeler, Hubert Knoblauch und Michael Hutter, 69–110. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Deutschland

    Ulrich Dolata

Authors
  1. Ulrich Dolata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Dolata .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst für Soziologie Campus Westend PEG, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Inst für Soziologie Campus Westend PEG, Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany

    Birgit Blättel-Mink

  2. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin Institut für Soziologie, Berlin, Germany

    Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer

  3. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin Institut für Soziologie, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Arnold Windeler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Dolata, U. (2019). Sektoraler Wandel durch Technik. In: Blättel-Mink, B., Schulz-Schaeffer, I., Windeler, A. (eds) Handbuch Innovationsforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17671-6_13-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17671-6_13-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17671-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17671-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Naturwissenschaften

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation