Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hauptsache neu? Die Organisation von Innovation und Kreativität

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Organisationssoziologie

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften ((SRS))

Zusammenfassung

In enger Auseinandersetzung mit der einschlägigen Fachliteratur bezieht sich der Beitrag auf zwei Arten von Neuerungen: Innovation und Kreativität. Den Ausgangspunkt bildet eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit vorherrschenden Mythen und Idealisierungen. In organisatorischer Hinsicht werden nicht nur Vernetzungen im Prozess der Hervorbringung von Innovation und Kreativität hervorgehoben, sondern auch über Stories und Narrationen verfasste retrospektive Deutungen, weil sie es sind, die für die Anerkennung von Neuerungen entscheidend sind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Amabile, Teresa M. 1996. Creativity in context. Colorado: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspers, Patrik. 2010. Orderly fashion. A sociology of markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Balzat, Markus, und Horst Hanusch. 2004. Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14(2): 197–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barley, Stephen R., John Freeman, und Ralph C. Hybels. 1992. Strategic alliances in commercial biotechnology. In Networks and organizations, Hrsg. Nitin Nohria und Robert G. Eccles, 311–347. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, Frank J. 1998. Creativity and improvisation in Jazz and organizations: Implications for organizational learning. Organization Science 9(5): 605–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, Joel A. C., Tony Calabrese, und Brian S. Silverman. 2000. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal 21(3): 267–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Howard S. 1974. Art as a collective action. American Sociological Review 39(6): 767–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Markus C. 2004. Organizational routines: A review of literature. Industrial and Corporate Change 13(4): 643–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, Jens. 2016. Imagined futures. Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, Herbert. 1969. Fashion: From class differentiation to collective selection. The Sociological Quarterly 10(3): 275–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boden, Mark, und Ian Miles, Hrsg. 2000. Services in the knowledge-based economy. London: Continuum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borup, Mads, Nik Brown, Kornelia Konrad, und Harro van Lente. 2006. The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18(3/4): 285–298. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, John S., und Paul Duguid. 1991. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science 2(1): 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, Tom, und George M. Stalker. 1961. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald S. 1992. Structural holes. The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110(2): 349–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper, Steven. 2007. How do technology clusters emerge and become sustainable? Social network formation and inter-firm mobility within San Diego biotechnology. Research Policy 36(4): 438–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, Manuel. 1996/2001. Das Informationszeitalter I: Die Netzwerkgesellschaft. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattani, Gino, und Simone Ferriani. 2008. A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: social networks and cinematic achievements in the hollywood film industry. Organization Science 19(6): 824–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves, Richard E. 2002. Creative industries: Contracts between art and commerce, 2. Aufl. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Katherine K. 2012. Organizing creativity: Enabling creative output, process, and organizing practices. Sociology Compass 6(8): 624–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Wesely M., und Daniel A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, Larry. 1965. Organizational climates for creativity. Academy of Management Journal 8(3): 220–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • DCMS, Department for Culture; Media and Sport. 2001. Creative industries mapping document. London: UK Labour Force, Department for Culture, Media and Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vaan, Mathijs, David Stark, und Balazs Vedres. 2015. Game changer: The topology of creativity. American Journal of Sociology 120(4): 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFillippi, Robert. 2015. Managing project-based organization in creative industries. In The Oxford handbook of creative industries, Hrsg. Candace Jones, Mark Lorenzen und Jonathan Sapsed, 268–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFillippi, Robert, Gernot Grabher, und Candace Jones. 2007. Introduction to paradoxes of creativity: Managerial and organizational challenges in the cultural economy. Journal of Organizational Behavior 28(5): 511–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul. 1991. Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: U.S. Art Museums, 1920–1940. In The new institutionalism in organizational analysis, Hrsg. Paul DiMaggio und Walter W. Powell, 267–292. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, Jon. 1983. Explaining technical change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Martha S., und Brian T. Pentland. 2003. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly 48(1): 94–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortwengel, Johann, Elke Schüßler, und Jörg Sydow. 2017. Studying organizational creativity as process: Fluidity or duality? Creativity and Innovation Management 26(1): 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, Raghu, Philipp Tuertscher, und Andrew H. Van de Ven. 2013. Perspectives on innovation processes. The Academy of Management Annals 7(1): 775–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godart, Frédéric C., Andrew V. Shipilov, und Kim Claes. 2014. Making the most of the revolving door: The impact of outward personnel mobility networks on organizational creativity. Organization Science 25:377–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godart, Frédéric C., William W. Maddux, Andrew V. Shipilov, und Adam D. Galinsky. 2015. Fashion with a foreign flair: Professional experiences abroad facilitate the creative innovations of organizations. Academy of Management Journal 58(1): 195–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabher, Gernot. 2002. The project ecology of advertising: Tasks, talents and teams. Regional Studies 36:245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabher, Gernot. 2004. Temporary architectures of learning: Knowledge governance in project ecologies. Organization Studies 25:1491–1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78:1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hage, Jerald, und Joseph R. Hollingsworth. 2000. A strategy for analysis of idea innovation networks and institutions. Organization Studies 21:971–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon, Andrew B., und Beth A. Bechky. 2006. When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science 17:484–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargadon, Andrew, und Robert I. Sutton. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(4): 716–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, Raimund. 1996. Organisierte Forschung. Arbeitsteilung, Wettbewerb und Networking in Wissenschaft und Technik. Berlin: Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, Raimund. 2003. Die Innovationsfähigkeit der Organisationsgesellschaft. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, Raimund. 2015. Weder Akteur noch System? Symposiumsbeitrag zu „The Emergence of Organizations and Markets“, Hrsg. John F. Padgett und Walter W. Powell. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012. Soziologische Revue 38:14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, Raimund, und Eva Passarge. 2015. Silicon Valley und sonst nichts Neues? Biotechnologie in der Schweiz als Beispiel für neue Organisationsformen und deren Legitimierung. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 44:6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasse, Raimund, und Eva Passarge. 2016. Institution, Dominant Actors, and Financial Markets. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 13(6): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häußling, Roger. 2015. Autokatalytische Netzwerke statt autokatalytische Systeme – ein Unterschied, der einen Unterschied macht. Symposiumsbeitrag zu „The Emergence of Organizations and Markets“, Hrsg. John F. Padgett und Walter W. Powell. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012. Soziologische Revue 38:4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch-Kreinsen, Hartmut. 2008. „Low-Tech“ Innovations. Industry & Innovation 15(1): 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, Joseph R., und Robert Boyer, Hrsg. 1997. Contemporary capitalism: The embeddedness of institutions. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human, Sherrie E., und Keith G. Provan. 2000. Legitimacy building in the evolution of small-firm multilateral networks. A comparative study of success and demise. Administrative Science Quarterly 45:327–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Candace, Mark Lorenzen, und Jonathan Sapsed, Hrsg. 2015. Creative industries – a typology of Chang. In The Oxford handbook of creative industries, 3–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Candace, Silviya Svejenova, Jesper Strandgaard, und Barbara Townley. 2016. Misfits, Mavericks and mainstreams: Drivers of innovation in creative industries. Organization Studies 37(6): 751–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khaire, Mukti. 2014. Fashioning an industry: Socio-cognitive processes in the construction of worth of a new industry. Organization Studies 35(1): 41–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampel, Joseph. 2008. The genius behind the system: The emergence of the central producer system in the hollywood motion picture industry. In The business of culture, Hrsg. Joseph Lampel, Jamal Shamsie und Theresa K. Lant, 41–56. New York/London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampel, Joseph, Theresa K. Lant, und Jamal Shamsie. 2000. Balancing act: Learning from organizing practices in cultural industries. Organization Science 11(3): 263–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampel, Joseph, Jamal Shamsie, und Theresa K. Lant, Hrsg. 2008. Toward a deeper understanding of cultural industries. In The business of culture, 3–14. New York/London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2:71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. 1938. Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review 3:672–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Ian. 1995. Services innovation: statistical and conceptual issues. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mora, Emanuela. 2006. Collective production of creativity in the Italian fashion system. Poetics 34(6): 334–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtha, Thomas P., Stefanie A. Lenway, und Jeffrey A. Hart. 2001. Managing new industry creation: Global knowledge formation and entrepreneurship in high technology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mützel, Sophie. 2010. Koordinierung von Märkten durch narrativen Wettbewerb. In Wirtschaftssoziologie. 49. Sonderheft der KZfSS, Hrsg. Jens Beckert und Christoph Deutschmann, 87–106. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mützel, Sophie (2015). Netzwerke als Prozesse. Soziologische Revue, 38(1): 22–29 . Symposiumsbeitrag zu John Padgett und Walter Powell. The emergence of organizations and markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Richard R., Hrsg. 1993. National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, David. 2012. Creative projects: A less routine approach toward getting new things done. Organization Science 23(6): 1571–1592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen-Smith, Jason, und Walter W. Powell. 2003. The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: Assessing the importance of experience and connectivity. Research Policy 32:1695–1711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, John F., und Walter W. Powell, Hrsg. 2012. The problem of emergence. In The emergence of organizations and markets, 1–30. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passarge, Eva. 2011. Variation institutioneller Arrangements. Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel des Biotechnologiesektors in der Schweiz. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pentland, Brian T., und Henry H. Rueter. 1994. Organizational routines as grammars of action. American Science Quarterly 39(3): 484–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W., Kenneth W. Koput, und Laurel Smith-Doerr. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41:116–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W., Douglas R. White, Kenneth W. Koput, und Jason Owen-Smith. 2005. Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of interorganizational collaboration in the life sciences. American Journal of Sociology 110(4): 1132–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammert, Werner. 1988. Das Innovationsdilemma. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rammert, Werner, Arnold Windeler, Hubert Knoblauch, und Michael Hutter, Hrsg. 2016. Innovationsgesellschaft heute: Perspektiven, Felder und Fälle. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, Anna Lee. 1991. The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley. Research Policy 20:423–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, Anna Lee. 1994. Regional Advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, David. 2009. The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, Arthur L. 1965. Social structure and organizations. In Handbook of organizations, Hrsg. James G. March, 142–193. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, Brian, und Jarrett Spiro. 2005. Collaboration and creativity: The small world phenomenon. American Journal of Sociology 111(2): 447–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, H. Andrew, Douglas E. Polley, Raghu Garud, und Sankaran Venkataraman. 1999. The innovation journey. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, Richard. 1984. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, Kiersten B., Jason Owen-Smith, und Walter W. Powell. 2009. Networks, propinquity, and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Administrative Science Quarterly 54:90–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windeler, Arnold, und Jörg Sydow. 2001. Project networks and changing industry practices – Collaborative content production in the German television industry. Organization Studies 23:1035–1060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, Richard W., John E. Sawyer, und Ricky W. Griffin. 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review 18(2): 293–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Luzern, Luzern, Schweiz

    Raimund Hasse

  2. Soziologisches Seminar, Universität Luzern, Luzern, Schweiz

    Sophie Mützel & Judith Nyfeler

Authors
  1. Raimund Hasse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sophie Mützel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Judith Nyfeler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raimund Hasse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Organisations- u Verwaltungssoziologie, Universität Potsdam, Postdam, Germany

    Maja Apelt

  2. Inst für Sozialwesen, Univ Kassel, Kassel, Hessen, Germany

    Ingo Bode

  3. Soziologisches Seminar, Universität Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland

    Raimund Hasse

  4. MCTS, TU München, München, Bayern, Germany

    Uli Meyer

  5. Institut für Soziologie, LMU München, München, Bayern, Germany

    Victoria V. Groddeck

  6. WiSo, TU Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany

    Maximiliane Wilkesmann

  7. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Arnold Windeler

Section Editor information

  1. Fachbereich Humanwissenschaften, Universität Kassel, Kassel, Deutschland

    Ingo Bode

  2. Universität Luzern, Luzern, Schweiz

    Raimund Hasse

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hasse, R., Mützel, S., Nyfeler, J. (2019). Hauptsache neu? Die Organisation von Innovation und Kreativität. In: Apelt, M., et al. Handbuch Organisationssoziologie. Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15953-5_36-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15953-5_36-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-15953-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-15953-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation