Skip to main content

Implizite Messung der psychologischen Markenstärke

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Wirtschaft ((SRW))

Zusammenfassung

Kaufentscheidungen von Markenprodukten unterliegen nicht nur der rationalen Abwägung von Argumenten. Vielmehr beeinflusst die automatische Zuwendung von Aufmerksamkeit und die Auslösung von Impulsen, deren Einflüsse Konsumenten nicht bewusst zugänglich sind, Kaufentscheidungen in einem wichtigen Ausmaß. Es ist daher notwendig, Marken auf einer impliziten Ebene zu positionieren und die Wirkung auf der impliziten Ebene zu erfassen und zu kontrollieren. Im Kapitel werden neurowissenschaftliche und reaktionszeitbasierte Methoden sowie die Aufzeichnung von Blickbewegungen als Instrumente der Erfassung impliziter Markenwirkungen vorgestellt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Literatur

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S., Wagner, U., & Schwand, C. (2012). Assessing advertising effectiveness: The potential of goal-directed behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 29, 411–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brasel, S. A., & Gips, J. (2011). Red Bull „Gives You Wings“ for better or worse: A double-edged impact of brand exposure on consumer performance. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büttner, O. B., Florack, A., Leder, H., Paul, M. A., Serfas, B. G., & Schulz, A. M. (2014). Hard to ignore impulsive buyers show an attentional bias in shopping situations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Hrsg.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y.-P., Nelson, L. D., & Hsu, M. (2015). From „where“ to „what“: Distributed representations of brand associations in the human brain. Journal of Marketing Research, 52, 453–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, R. A., Zaltman, G., & Coulter, K. S. (2001). Interpreting consumer perceptions of advertising: An application of the Zaltman metaphor elicitation technique. Journal of Advertising, 30, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deppe, M., Schwindt, W., Kugel, H., Plaßmann, H., & Kenning, P. (2005). Nonlinear responses within the medial prefrontal cortex reveal when specific implicit information influences economic decision making. Journal of Neuroimaging, 15, 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esch, F.-R., Möll, T., Schmitt, B., Elger, C. E., Neuhaus, C., & Weber, B. (2012). Brands on the brain: Do consumers use declarative information or experienced emotions to evaluate brands? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R. H., & Towles-Schwen, T. (1999). The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Hrsg.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (S. 97–116). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimons, G. M., Chartrand, T. L., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2008). Automatic effects of brand exposure on motivated behavior: How apple makes you „think different“. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florack, A., Genschow, O., & Palcu, J. (im Druck). Implizite Markenführung. In A. Schimansky (Hrsg.), Der neue Wert der Marke: Markenbewertungsverfahren für ein erfolgreiches Markenmanagement. Vahlen: München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florack, A., & Palcu, J. (im Druck). The psychology of branding. In C. Jansson-Boyd & M. Zawisza (Hrsg.), Routledge international handbook of consumer psychology. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friese, M., Wänke, M., & Plessner, H. (2006). Implicit consumer preferences and their influence on product choice. Psychology and Marketing, 23, 727–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genschow, O., Florack, A., Chib, V. S., Shimojo, S., Scarabis, M., & Wänke, M. (2013). Reaching for the (product) stars: Measuring recognition and approach speed to get insights into consumer choice. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35, 298–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, B. (2008). Can evaluative conditioning change attitudes toward mature brands? New evidence from the implicit association test. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 178–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (2012). Beyond pleasure and pain: How motivation works. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & Van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janiszewski, C., Kuo, A., & Tavassoli, N. T. (2013). The influence of selective attention and inattention to products on subsequent choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 39, 1258–1274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93, 1449–1475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. D. (2007). The X- and C-Systems: The neural basis of automatic and controlled social cognition. In E. Harmon-Jones & P. Winkielman (Hrsg.), Social neuroscience (S. 290–315). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maison, D., Greenwald, A. G., & Bruin, R. H. (2004). Predictive validity of the implicit association test in studies of brands, consumer attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 405–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, C., & Wänke, M. (2011). Unconscious information processing reduces information overload and increases product satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, J. H., Keefe, D. E., & Ross, K. L. (1989). Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1003–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 184–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palcu, J., & Florack, A. (2016). Eye-Tracking und reaktionszeitbasierte Verfahren zur Messung impliziter Kommunikationswirkungen. In F.-R. Esch, T. Langner & M. Bruhn (Hrsg.), Handbuch Controlling der Kommunikation (S. 251–273). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, S. E., & Posner, M. I. (2012). The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35, 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plassmann, H., Kenning, P., & Ahlert, D. (2007). Why companies should make their customers happy: The neural correlates of customer loyalty. Advances in Consumer Research, 34, 735–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plassmann, H., Ramsoy, T. Z., & Milosavljevic, M. (2012). Branding the brain: A critical review and outlook. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 18–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothermund, K., & Eder, A. B. (2011). Allgemeine Psychologie: Motivation und Emotion. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, J. E., & Leclerc, F. (1994). An eye-fixation analysis of choice processes for consumer nondurables. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 274–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarabis, M., Scheier, C. & Held, D. (im Druck). Brand Code Management: Wie wir Marken im Autopiloten der Konsumenten platzieren. In A. Schimansky (Hrsg.), Der neue Wert der Marke: Markenbewertungsverfahren für ein erfolgreiches Markenmanagement. München: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarabis, M., & Florack, A. (2003). Was denkt der Konsument wirklich? Reaktionszeitbasierte Verfahren als Instrument der Markenanalyse. Planung & Analyse, 6, 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarabis, M., & Florack, A. (2007). Neue Einsichten durch neue Methoden: Reaktionszeitbasierte Verfahren in der Marken und Werbeforschung. In A. Florack, M. Scarabis & E. Primosch (Hrsg.), Psychologie der Markenführung (S. 463–483). Vahlen: München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarabis, M., & Heinsen, S. (2008). „Implicit Diagnostics“ – Die Fenster zum Unbewussten öffnen. Marketing Review St. Gallen, 25, 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarabis, M., Florack, A., & Gosejohann, S. (2006). When consumers follow their feelings: The impact of affective or cognitive focus on the basis of consumers’ choice. Psychology & Marketing, 23, 1005–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, C., & Scarabis, M. (2010). Das Implizite in der Marketingforschung: Was funktioniert in der Praxis? In W. J. Koschnick (Hrsg.), Focus-Jahrbuch 2010 (S. 51–72). München: Focus Magazin-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F., & Fink, G. R. (2013). Funktionelle MRT in Psychiatrie und Neurologie. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schultheiss, O. C., Yankova, D., Dirlikov, B., & Schad, D. J. (2009). Are implicit and explicit motive measures statistically independent? A fair and balanced test using the picture story exercise and a cue- and response-matched questionnaire measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serfas, B. G., Büttner, O. B., & Florack, A. (2014). Eyes wide shopped: Shopping situations trigger arousal in impulsive buyers. PloS One, 9(12), e114593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serfas, B. G., Büttner, O. B., & Florack, A. (2016). Using implementation intentions in shopping situations: How arousal can help shield consumers against temptation. Applied Cognitive Psychology. doi:10.1002/acp.3241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimojo, S., Simion, C., Shimojo, E., & Scheier, C. (2003). Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 1317–1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiv, B., & Fedorikhin, A. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 278–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slabbinck, H., De Houwer, J., & Van Kenhove, P. (2011). A pictorial attitude IAT as a measure of implicit motives. European Journal of Personality, 25, 76–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tusche, A., Bode, S., & Haynes, J.-D. (2010). Neural responses to unattended products predict later consumer choices. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 8024–8031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlmann, E. L., Leavitt, K., Menges, J. I., Koopman, J., Howe, M., & Johnson, R. E. (2012). Getting explicit about the implicit: A taxonomy of implicit measures and guide for their use in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 553–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittenbrink, B., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 262–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziems, D. (2004). The morphological approach for unconscious consumer motivation research. Journal of Advertising Research, 44, 210–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arnd Florack .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this entry

Cite this entry

Florack, A., Scarabis, M. (2016). Implizite Messung der psychologischen Markenstärke. In: Esch, FR. (eds) Handbuch Markenführung. Springer Reference Wirtschaft . Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13361-0_54-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13361-0_54-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-13361-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Wirtschaftswissenschaften

Publish with us

Policies and ethics