Skip to main content

Kognitive Verarbeitung von Gesundheitsinformationen

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften ((SRS))

Zusammenfassung

Information und Kommunikation stellen wichtige Mittel dar, um Krankheiten zu bewältigen oder gesundheitsbezogene Einstellungen auszubilden. Dabei ist nicht nur die Informationssuche, sondern auch die kognitive Informationsverarbeitung für das Erreichen der jeweiligen Zielsetzung entscheidend. Die Verarbeitung ist geprägt durch die Notwendigkeit zur Ressourcenallokation und Selektion, die dazu führt, dass aufgrund von bestimmten Kriterien (wie der Konsistenz, Unsicherheit oder Ursachen der Elaborationsstärke) spezifische Informationen bevorzugt werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Literatur

  • Baumann, E. (2009). Die Symptomatik des Medienhandelns: Zur Rolle der Medien im Kontext der Entstehung, des Verlaufs und der Bewältigung eines gestörten Essverhaltens. Köln: Herbert von Halem Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonfadelli, H. (2004). Medienwirkungsforschung I. Grundlagen und theoretische Perspektiven. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradac, J. J. (2001). Theory comparison: Uncertainty reduction, problematic integration, uncertainty management, and other curious constructs. Journal of Communication, 51(3), 456–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brashers, D. E. (2001). Communication and uncertainty management. Journal of Communication, 51(3), 477–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brashers, D. E., Neidig, J. L., Cardillo, L. W., Dobbs, L. K., Russell, J. A., & Haas, S. M. (1999). In an important way I did die: Uncertainty and revival in persons living with HIV or AIDS. AIDS Care, 11(2), 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brashers, D. E., Neidig, J. L., Haas, S. M., Dobbs, L. K., Cardillo, L. W., & Russell, J. A. (2000). Communication in the management of uncertainty: The case of persons living with HIV or AIDS. Communication Monographs, 67(1), 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brashers, D. E., Goldsmith, D. J., & Hsieh, E. (2002). Information seeking and avoiding in health contexts. Human Communication Research, 28(2), 258–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C. J. (2015). A meta-analysis of the ELM’s argument quality × processing type predictions. Human Communication Research, 41(4), 501–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dervin, B. (1989). Audience as listener and learner, teacher and confidante: The sense-making approach. In R. Rice & C. Atkin (Hrsg.), Public communication campaigns (2. Aufl., S. 67–86). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervin, B. (2003). Mass communicating: Changing conceptions of the audience. In B. Dervin, L. Foreman-Wernet & E. Lauterbach (Hrsg.), Sense-making methodology reader: Selected writings of Brenda Dervin (S. 197–213). Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervin, B., & Frenette, M. (2001). Sense-making methodology: Communicating communicatively with campaign audience. In R. E. Rice & C. K. Atkin (Hrsg.), Public communication campaigns (3. Aufl., S. 69–87). Thousan Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, P., Jonas, E., Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2005). Selective exposure to information: The impact of information limits. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(4), 469–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D., Schulz-Hardt, S., & Stahlberg, D. (1996). Information seeking among individuals and groups and possible consequences for decision making in business and politics. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Hrsg.), Understanding group behavior (S. 211–225). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • MSL Germany. (2012). Wie social ist das Gesundheits-Web? Die MSL-Gesundheitsstudie 2012. skopos.de/news/skopos_ge sundheit-2012-broschuere.pdf. Zugegriffen am 15.09.2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessels, R. P. (2003). Patients’ memory for medical information. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(5), 219–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimmt, C. (2011). Das elaboration-likelihood-modell (Lehrbuch-Reihe „Konzepte“). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2015). Choice and preference in media use: Advances in selective exposure-research. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2009). Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counter-attitudinal political information. Communication Research, 36(3), 426–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreuter, M. W., & Wray, R. J. (2003). Tailored and targeted health communication: Strategies for enhancing information relevance. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27(Suppl 3), 227–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, A. (2006). Motivated cognition (LC4MP): The influence of appetitive and aversive activation on the processing of video games. In P. Messarsis & L. Humphrier (Hrsg.), Digital media: Transformation in human communication (S. 237–256). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishel, M. H. (1988). Uncertainty in illness. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 20, 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishel, M. H. (1990). Reconceptualization of the uncertainty in illness theory. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 22(4), 256–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue-involvement and increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1915–1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The eloboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Hrsg.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Bd. 19, S. 123–205). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G., & Williams, K. (1980). The effects of group diffusion of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(1), 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Heesacker, M. (1985). Persistence of persuasion: A test of the Elaboration Likelihood Model. Nicht-veröffentlichtes Manuskript, Universität Missouri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veveau, N. N., & Miller, A. M. (2010). Patient narratives: Exploring the fit of uncertainty management models of health care. The Review of Communication, 10(4), 276–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 59(4), 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Link .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this entry

Cite this entry

Link, E., Klimmt, C. (2016). Kognitive Verarbeitung von Gesundheitsinformationen. In: Rossmann, C., Hastall, M. (eds) Handbuch Gesundheitskommunikation. Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10948-6_19-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10948-6_19-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10948-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics