Advertisement

Intellectual Property Rights in the Digital Sphere

  • Nicola Lucchi
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften book series (SRS)

Abstract

The chapter illustrates the difficulties in the regulation of information and content in the digital sphere offering a simple but complete overview of the legal instruments adopted in recent years around the world. In particular, it looks at these issues in the context of European and North American jurisdictions.

Keywords

Property rights Copyright Digital sphere Intellectual property Content regulation Internet New media Digital assets 

References

  1. Abbott, Frederick M. 1997. Public policy and global technological integration: An introduction. In Public policy and global technological integration, ed. Frederick M. Abbott, and David J. Gerber, 3–13. London/Boston: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  2. Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets & freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bettig, Ronald V. 1996. Copyright culture: The political economy of intellectual property. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burrell, Robert, and Coleman, Allison. 2005. Copyright exceptions: The digital impact. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Castells, Manuel. 2010. The power of identity, 2nd ed. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Davies, Gillian. 2002. Copyright and the public interest, 2. Aufl.. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
  7. Deibert, Ronald J., John Palfrey, Rafal Rohozinski, and Jonathan Zittrain (eds.). 2010. Access controlled: The shaping of power, rights, and rule in cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, Lilian. 2011. Role and responsibility of Internet intermediaries in the field of copyright and related rights. WIPO Study. http://www.wipo.int/copyright/en/doc/role_and_responsibility_of_the_internet_intermediaries_final.pdf. Accessed 15.09.2016.
  9. Edwards, Lilian. 2009. The fall and rise of intermediary liability online. In Law and the Internet, ed. Lilian Edwards, and Charlotte Waelde, 47–88. Oxford, UK/Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Eisenstein, Elizabeth. 1979. The printing press as an agent of change: Communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press‬.Google Scholar
  11. Geiger, Christophe. 2010a. Promoting creativity through copyright limitations: Reflections on the concept of exclusivity in copyright law. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law 12: 515–548.Google Scholar
  12. Geiger, Christophe. 2010b. The future of copyright in Europe: Striking a fair balance between protection and access to information. Intellectual Property Quarterly 14(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
  13. Geiger, Christophe. 2008. Flexibilising copyright – Remedies to the privatisation of information by copyright law. International Review of Industrial Property and Competition Law 39: 178–197.Google Scholar
  14. Geller, Paul Edward. 1992. New dynamics in international copyright, 16 Colum.-VLA J.L. & Arts 461: 461–473.Google Scholar
  15. Gerber, David J. 1997. Global technological integration, intellectual property rights and competition law: Some introductory comments. In Public policy and global technological integration, ed. Frederick M. Abbott, and David J. Gerber, 15–24. London/Boston: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  16. Goldsmith, Jack, and Tim Wu. 2006. Who controls the Internet? Illusions of a borderless world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Gordon, Wendy J. 2002. Excuse and justification in the law of fair use: Commodification and market perspectives. In The commodification of information, ed. Niva Elkin-Koren, and Neil Weinstock Netanel, 149–192. The Hague/London/New York: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  18. Guibault, Lucie M.C.R. 2002. Copyright limitations and contracts: An analysis of the contractual overridability of limitations on copyright. The Hague/London/Boston: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  19. Hamilton, Marci A. 1996. The TRIPS agreement: Imperialistic, outdated, and overprotective. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 29: 613–634.Google Scholar
  20. Kleinschmidt, Broder. 2010. An international comparison of ISP’s liabilities for unlawful third party content. International Journal of Law and Information Technology 18: 332–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Landes William M. and Richard A. 1989. An economic analysis of copyright law. Journal of Legal Studies 18: 325–363.Google Scholar
  22. Lemley, Mark. 2007. Rationalizing Internet safe harbors. Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law 6: 101–120.Google Scholar
  23. Litman, Jessica. 2001. Digital copyright. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  24. Lucchi, Nicola. 2015. Internet-based communication: Rights, risks and opportunities. European Journal of Risk Regulation 6: 121–128.Google Scholar
  25. National Research Council. 2000. The digital dilemma: Intellectual property in the information age. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  26. Palmieri, Alessandro, and Roberto Pardolesi. 2002. Gli Access Contracts: Una Nuova Categoria per il Diritto dell’Età Digitale. Rivista di Diritto Privato 7: 265–286.Google Scholar
  27. Patterson, L. Ray. 1968. Copyright in historical perspective. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Radin, Margaret J. 2002. Online standardization and the integration of text and machine. Fordham Law Review 70: 1125–1146.Google Scholar
  29. Reichman, Jerome H., Graeme Dinwoodie, and Pamela Samuelson. 2007. A reverse notice and takedown regime to enable public interest uses of technically protected copyrighted works. Berkeley Technology Law Journal 22: 981–1060.Google Scholar
  30. Rodotà, Stefano. 2006. La Vita e le Regole: Tra Diritto e Non Diritto. Milano: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
  31. Romer, Paul. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. The Journal of Political Economy 94: 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schmookler, Jacob. 1966. Invention and economic growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shapiro, Carl, and Hal R. Varian. 1999. Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  34. Sell, Susan K. 2002. TRIPs and the access to medicines campaign. Wisconsin International Law Journal 20: 481–522.Google Scholar
  35. Sell, Susan K. 2003. Private power, public law: The globalization of intellectual property rights. Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sell, Susan K., and Christopher May. 2001. Moments in law: Contestation and settlement in the history of intellectual property. Review of International Political Economy 8: 467–500.Google Scholar
  37. Stokes, Simon. 2002. Digital copyright: Law and practice. London: Butterworths LexisNexis UK.Google Scholar
  38. Strowel, Alain. 2009. Internet piracy as a wake-up call for copyright law makers – Is the “Graduated Response” a good reply? World Intellectual Property Organisation Journal 1: 75–86.Google Scholar
  39. Szuskin, Laurent, Sophie Fourques de Ruyter, and Jennifer Doucleff. 2009. Beyond counterfeiting: The expanding battle against online piracy. Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal 21(11): 1–12.Google Scholar
  40. Vaidhyanathan, Siva. 2001. Copyrights and copywrongs – The rise of intellectual property and how it threatens creativity. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Van Dijk, Jan. 1999. The network society: Social aspects of new media. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jönköping International Business SchoolJönköping University FoundationJönköpingSchweden

Personalised recommendations