Advertisement

Umweltinnovationen im Pkw-Bereich: Kann Verkehrspolitik Technologiesprünge erzwingen?

Living reference work entry

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag vergleicht die ordnungspolitischen Ansätze bezüglich der Förderung alternativer Antriebstechnologien in Kalifornien und Europa. Die Kernfrage ist, wie effektiv damit alternative Antriebe in die Strategien der Hersteller integriert werden können.

Schlüsselwörter

Elektrofahrzeug CO2 Grenzwert Supercredits Technology Forcing 

Literatur

  1. California Air Resources Board – CARB. 2012. Zero emission vehicle standards for 2009 through 2017 model year passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium-duty vehicles. http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2012/zev2012/zev2012.htm. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  2. Canzler, Weert, und Andreas Knie. 2011. Einfach aufladen. Mit Elektromobilität in eine saubere Zukunft. München: Oekom Verlag.Google Scholar
  3. Europäische Union – EU. 2009. Regulation EC-No 443/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 setting emission performance standards for new passenger cars as part of the Community’s integrated approach to reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles. Official Journal of the European Union L 140/1, 5.06.2009. Brüssel.Google Scholar
  4. Europäische Kommission. 1999. Commission Recommendation of 5 February 1999 on the reduction of CO2 emissions from passenger cars. Official Journal of the European Communities L 40/49, 13.02.1999. Brüssel.Google Scholar
  5. Europäische Kommission. 2001. European governance – A white paper. Official Journal of the European Communities C 287/1, 12.10.2001. Brüssel.Google Scholar
  6. Europäische Kommission. 2012. Impact assessment – accompanying the documents proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation EC-No 443/2009 to define the modalities for reaching the 2020 target to reduce CO2 emissions from new passenger cars. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/organic/documents/eu-policy/policy-development/impact-assessment/impact-assessment-part1_en.pdf. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  7. European Federation for Transport and Environment – T&E. 2000. The drive for less fuel – will the motor industry be able to honour its commitment to the European Union? http://www.transportenvironment.org/publications/drive-less-fuel-te-0001. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  8. European Federation for Transport and Environment – T&E. 2009. Reducing CO2 emissions from new cars: a study of major car manufacturers’ progress in 2008. http://www.transportenvironment.org/sites/te/files/media/2009_09_car_company_co2_report_final.pdf. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  9. Faivre d’Arcier, Bruno, und Lecler Yveline. 2014. Promoting next generation vehicles in Japan: the smart communities and their experimentations. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management 14(3/4): 324–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fraunhofer ISI. 2013. Markthochlaufszenarien für Elektrofahrzeuge Langfassung. P. Plötz, T. Gnann, A. Kühn, M. Wietschel. Fraunhofer Institut für System und Innovationsforschung. http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-media/docs/e/de/publikationen/Fraunhofer-ISI-Markthochlaufszenarien-Elektrofahrzeuge-Langfassung.pdf. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  11. Gerard, David, und Lester B. Lave. 2004. Implementing technology-forcing policies: The 1970 Clean Air Act Amendments and the introduction of advanced automotive emissions controls in the United States. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 72(7): 761–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Governor’s Interagency Working Group on Zero-emission Vehicles. 2013. – ZEV action plan – a roadmap toward 1.5 million zero-emission vehicles on California roadways by 2025.Google Scholar
  13. Greimel, Hans. 2014. Toyota fuel cell car to cost $69,000 in Japan, debut in U.S., Europe in 2015. In Automotive News vom 6.08.2014, http://www.autonews.com/article/20140625/OEM05/140629935/toyota-fuel-cell-car-to-cost-%2469000-in-japan-debut-in-u.s.-europe-in. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  14. Hall, Fiona. 2013. Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation EC-No 443/2009, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A7-2013-0151+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  15. Hildermeier, Julia. 2014. Sustainable mobility in European cities. European Commission Spend on Local Electric Mobility. Paper presented on GERPISA International Conference, Kyoto, June 4–6, 2014 (unpublished). http://gerpisa.org/node/2410. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  16. International Council for Clean Transportation – ICCT. 2012. Discrepancies between type- approval and „real-world“ fuel- consumption and CO2 values. http://www.theicct.org/fuel-consumption-discrepancies. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  17. International Council for Clean Transportation – ICCT. 2014a. Driving electrification: a global comparison of fiscal incentive policy for electric vehicles. http://www.theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/ICCT_EV-fiscal-incentives_20140506.pdf. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  18. International Council for Clean Transportation – ICCT. 2014b. EU CO2 emission standards for passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles. http://www.theicct.org/eu-co2-standards-passenger-cars-and-lcvs. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  19. Icha, Petra. 2014. Entwicklung der spezifischen Kohlendioxid-Emissionen des deutschen Strommix in den Jahren 1990 bis 2013. http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/376/publikationen/climate_change_23_2014_komplett.pdf. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  20. Jöhrens, Julius. 2013a. Interview mit Daniel Sperling, Mitglied des California Air Resources Board.Google Scholar
  21. Jöhrens, Julius. 2013b. Interview mit einem Vertreter von General Motors.Google Scholar
  22. Jöhrens, Julius. 2013c. Interview mit Jeff Alson und David Ganss, EPA.Google Scholar
  23. Krust, Matthias. 2013. CO2-Regeln: Reithofer fordert Supercredits. Automobilwoche 28.10.2013. http://www.automobilwoche.de/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20131028/NACHRICHTEN/131029947/reithofer-fordert-supercredits#.U-TKsf6XWO0. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  24. Lee, Jaegul, Francisco M. Veloso, und David A. Hounshell. 2011. Linking induced technological change, and environmental regulation: Evidence from patenting in the U.S. auto industry. Research Policy 40(9): 1240–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lenschow, Andrea, und Rottmann, Katja. 2005. „Privatising“ EU governance: emergence and characteristics of voluntary agreements in European environmental policy. Paper prepared for scientific workshop „soft modes of governance and the private sector – the EU and the global experience“, Darmstadt, 1.–3. November 2005. http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/projekte/typo3/site/fileadmin/research%20groups/6/Papers_Soft%20Mode/Lenschow%20Rottmann.pdf. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  26. Myklebust, Benjamin. 2013. EVs in bus lanes – controversial incentive. Paper presented at EVS27 international battery, hybrid and fuel cell electric vehicle symposium. http://e-mobility-nsr.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/info-pool/EVs_in_bus_lane_Benjamin_Myklebust_ZERO_EVS27.pdf. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  27. Neil, Dan. 2009. The Rick Wagoner vehicles: hits and misses. Los Angeles Times 21.03.2009. http://articles.latimes.com/2009/mar/31/business/fi-gm-cars31. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  28. Pilkington, Alan, und Romano Dyerson. 2006. Innovation in disruptive regulatory environments development. European Journal of Innovation Management 9(1): 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shahan, Cynthia. 2014. Top electric car states – which has the highest percentage of electric cars? 3.02.2014. http://cleantechnica.com/2014/02/03/top-electric-car-states-highest-percentage-electric-cars. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  30. Shnayerson, Michael. 1996. The car that could. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  31. U.S. Department of Energy. 2014. Loan program office projects. http://energy.gov/lpo/projects. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  32. U.S. Department of Transportation. 2013. Average fuel efficiency of U.S. light duty vehicle. http://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_04_23.html. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  33. Verband der Automobilindustrie - VDA. 1995. Auto 94/95 - Jahresbericht des Verbandes der Automobilindustrie e.V. https://www.vda.de/dam/vda/publications/1318237659_de_408829382.pdf. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.
  34. Wang, Hua, und Chris Kimble. 2013. Innovation and leapfrogging in the chinese automobile industry: Examples from Geely, BYD, and Shifeng. Global Business and Organizational Excellence 32(6): 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weider, Marc. 2007. Technology Forcing – Verkehrspolitik und Umweltinnovation. In Handbuch der Verkehrspolitik, Hrsg. Oliver Schöller, Weert Canzler und Andreas Knie, 663–686. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag fﺰr Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  36. Zubaryeva, Alyona, und Christan Thiel. 2013. Paving the way to electrified road transport Publicly funded research, development and demonstration projects on electric and plug-in vehicles in Europe. http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/111111111/27868/1/report_e-mobility_projecs_final_online.pdf. Zugegriffen am 06.03.2015.

Copyright information

© VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Wiesbaden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ifeu - Institut für Energie- und UmweltforschungHeidelbergDeutschland
  2. 2.Ecole Normale Superieure Cachan, Frankreich und Humboldt-Universität BerlinBerlinDeutschland

Personalised recommendations