Partizipation in der Vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft

Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

Part of the Springer NachschlageWissen book series

Zusammenfassung

Die enge Verbundenheit von gesellschaftlichen und politischen Wandeln und die Entwicklungen in der politischen Beteiligung, stellen die Partizipationsforschung immer wieder vor große Herausforderungen. Dabei zeigt die vergleichende Forschung immer wieder große Unterschiede in Ausmaß und Umfang politischer Partizipation zwischen verschiedenen Ländern. Länderspezifischen Charakteristika sind: durchaus geringe Beteiligung, ähnliche Strukturierung des Partizipationsrepertoires, wandelnde Popularität verschiedener Formen und ständig ungleiche Beteiligung. Im Zeitvergleich steht der ständigen Ausweitung des Repertoires die These eines Rückgangs des ohnehin niedrigen Niveaus politischer Beteiligung gegenüber. Die weitere Verbreitung von „individualised collective action“ und die Benutzung von neuen sozialen Medien wird die Partizipationsforschung in den nächsten Jahren kennzeichnen.

Schlüsselwörter

Partizipation Demokratie Engagement Ungleichheit politischer Wandel 

Literatur

  1. Barnes, Samuel H., Max Kaase, Klaus R. Allerbeck, Barbara G. Farah, Felix Heunks, Inglehart Ronald, M. Kent Jennings, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Alan Marsh, und Leopold Rosenmayr. 1979. Political action: Mass participation in five western democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, W. Lance, und Alexandra Segerberg 2013. The logic of connective action. Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Berelson, Bernard R., Paul F. Lazarsfeld, und William N. McPhee. 1954. Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bimber, Bruce, Cynthia Stohl, und Andrew J. Flanagin. 2008. Technological change and the shifting nature of political organization. In Routledge handbook of internet politics, Hrsg. Andrew Chadwick und Philip N. Howard, 72–85. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Brady, Henry E. 1998. Political participation. In Measures of political attitudes, Hrsg. John P. Robinson, Philip R. Shaver, und Lawrence S. Wrightsman, 737–801. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, und Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Císař, Ondřej, und Kateřina Vráblíková. 2013. Transnational activism of social movement organizations: The effect of European Union funding on local groups in the Czech Republic. European Union Politics 14: 140–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conge, Patrick J. 1988. The concept of political participation. Toward a definition. Comparative Politics 20: 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fox, Stuart. 2013. Is it time to update the definition of political participation? Political participation in Britain: The decline and revival of civic culture. Parliamentary Affairs: 1–11.Google Scholar
  10. Francisco, Ronald A. 2010. Collective action theory and empirical evidence. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fuchs, Dieter, und Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 1995. Citizens and the state: A changing relationship? In Citizens and the state, Hrsg. Hans-Dieter Klingemann und Dieter Fuchs, 1–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gabriel, Oscar W., und Kerstin Völkl. 2008. Politische und Soziale Partizipation. In Die EU-Staaten im Vergleich. Strukturen, Prozesse, Politikinhalte, Hrsg. Oscar W. Gabriel und Sabine Kropp, 268–298. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. García Albaceta, Gema M. 2014. Young people’s political participation in Western Europe. Continuity or generational change? Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  14. Gerhardt, Volker. 2007. Partizipation. Das Prinzip der Politik. München: Beck.Google Scholar
  15. Harrebye, Silas, und Anders Ejrnæs. 2015. European patterns of participation – How dissatisfaction motivates extra-parliamentary activities given the right institutional conditions. Comparative European Politics 13: 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hooghe, Marc, und Ellen Quintelier. 2013. Political participation in Europe. In Society and democracy in Europe, Hrsg. Silke I. Keil und Oscar W. Gabriel, 220–243. London: Rotledge.Google Scholar
  17. Inglehart, Ronald. 1977. The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kaase, Max. 1995. Partizipation. In Wörterbuch Staat und Politik, Hrsg. Dieter Nohlen, 521–527. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.Google Scholar
  19. Keil, Silke I. 2012. Partizipation und Ungleichheit. In Deutschlands Metamorphosen. Ergebnisse des European Social Survey 2002 bis 2008, Hrsg. Silke I. Keil und Jan W. van Deth, 173–208. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  20. Koopmans, Ruud, und Paul Statham. 1999. Political claims analysis: Integrating protest event and political discourse approaches. Mobilization 4: 203–221.Google Scholar
  21. Kriesi, Hanspeter, Ruud Koopmans, Jan Willem Duyvendak, und Marco G. Giugni. 1995. New social movements in western Europe. A comparative analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lane, Robert E. 1959. Why and how people get involved in politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lazarsfeld, Paul M., Bernard Berelson, und Hazel Gaudet. 1948. The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Levine, David K., und Thomas R. Palfrey. 2007. The paradox of voter participation? A laboratory study. American Political Science Review 101: 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Micheletti, Michelle. 2003. Political virtue and shopping. Individuals, consumerism and collective action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nam, Taehyun. 2007. Rough days in democracies: Comparing protests in democracies. European Journal of Political Research 46: 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Norris, Pippa. 2002. Democratic phoenix. Reinventing political activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pattie, Charles, Patrick Seyd, und Paul Whiteley. 2004. Citizenship in Britain. Values, participation and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Persson, Mikael, und Maria Solevid. 2013. Measuring political participation – Testing social desirability bias in a web-survey experiment. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 26: 98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schlozman, Kay L., Sidney Verba, und Henry E. Brady. 2012. The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shirky, Clay. 2008. Here comes everybody. The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  33. Sossou, Marie-Antoinette. 2011. We do not enjoy equal political rights: Ghanaian women's perceptions on political participation in Ghana. SAGE Open. Google Scholar
  34. Teorell, Jan, Mariano Torcal, und José Ramón Montero. 2007. Political participation: Mapping the terrain. In Citizenship and involvement in European democracies: A comparative analysis, Hrsg. Jan W. van Deth, José Ramón Montero, und Anders Westholm, 334–357. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Theocharis, Yannis, Will Lowe, Jan W. van Deth, und Gema García-Albacete. 2014. Using Twitter to mobilize protest action: online mobilization patterns and action repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi movements. Information, Communication & Society 18: 202–220.Google Scholar
  36. van der Meer, Tom W.G., Jan W. van Deth, und Peer L.H. Scheepers. 2009. The politicized participant: Ideology and political action in 20 democracies. Comparative Political Studies 42: 1426–1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. van Deth, Jan W. 2006. Vergleichende Politische Partizipationsforschung. In Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft. Ein einführendes Studienhandbuch, Hrsg. Dirk Berg-Schlosser und Ferdinand Müller-Rommel, 167–188. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.Google Scholar
  38. van Deth, Jan W. 2013. Sind Partizipierende die besseren Demokraten? In Zivile Bürgergesellschaft und Demokratie. Aktuelle Ergebnisse der empirischen Politikforschung, Hrsg. Silke I. Keil und S. Isabell Thaidigsmann, 35–52. Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van Deth, Jan W. 2001. Studying political participation: Towards a theory of everything? Paper presented at the Joint sessions of workshops of the European Consortium for Political Research. Frankreich: Grenoble.Google Scholar
  40. van Deth, Jan W., José Ramón Montero, und Anders Westholm. Hrsg. 2007. Citizenship and involvement in European democracies: A comparative analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. van Deth, Jan W. 2010. Is creative participation good for democracy? In Creative participation responsibility-taking in the political world, Hrsg. Michelle Micheletti und Andrew S. McFarland, 146–170. Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
  42. van Deth, Jan W. 2012. New modes of participation and norms of citizenship. In Professionalization and individualized collective action: Analyzing new ‚Participatory‘ dimensions in civil society, Hrsg. Jan W. van Deth und William Maloney, 115–138. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. van Deth, Jan W. 2014. A conceptual map of political participation. Acta Politica 49: 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Verba, Sidney, und Norman Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  45. Verba, Sidney, Kay L. Schlozman, und Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and equality. Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Vráblíková, Kateřina. 2014. How context matters? Mobilization, political opportunity structures, and nonelectoral political participation in old and new democracies. Comparative Political Studies 47: 203–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walgrave, Stefaan, und Joris Verhulst. 2011. Selection and response bias in protest surveys. Mobilization 16: 203–222.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Politische Wissenschaft und International Vergleichende SozialforschungUniversität MannheimMannheimDeutschland

Personalised recommendations