Abstract
The chapter at hand outlines basic concepts and procedural requirements of forestry project management, i.e., ODA-supported measures in pursuit of forest sector development goals.
Since about the mid-1980s forestry projects underwent significant change, shifting from more strictly sectoral and technical foci towards growing recognition of international forest-related policy processes, closer alignment with national development goals and priorities, growing integration of forestry interventions into wider rural development rationales, and greater donor cooperation and harmonization. Along with these trends came growing awareness for the need to reliably monitor the progress of project implementation, and to objectively gauge the realization of a given intervention’s stated objectives.
As projects are increasingly judged by the deliberate, beneficial changes they trigger (= impact), the concept of “results-based management” seeks to establish direct, causal relationships between activities undertaken by a project and the services as well as deliverables thus achieved and changes ensuing on the partners’ and/or recipients’ side. The five OECD-DAC Criteria (relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability) provide objectively verifiable benchmarks to this end.
Managing for results first requires that project objectives be conceived in reference to systematic problem analyses, and that, secondly, sets of objectively verifiable indicators be devised to measure the degree to which said objectives are achieved. Once in place, objectives require further operationalization, e.g., by means of being broken down into individually achievable outcomes which, in turn, then provide the point of departure for constructing a process structure consisting of subordinate result chains for each of the outcomes identified.
Actual project implementation is primarily governed by jointly conceived plans of operation, to be broken down further into annual work plans. Realizing that the achievement of a project’s objective can normally be verified only towards the end of the implementation period, intermediate benchmarks (“milestones”) must be defined so as to facilitate continuous progress monitoring. Monitoring likewise enables periodical reassessments of the project’s intervention logic in reference to emerging trends and changing framework conditions. This adds a measure of flexibility to the concept of results-based management, encouraging evidence-based adjustment and corrective action as and when required.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
European Commission (2004) Aid delivery methods – project cycle management guidelines, vol 1. DG Development/EuropeAid, Brussels
Evaluation for the European Commission (2004) Evaluation of the environment and forests regulations 2493/2000 and 2494/2000 synthesis report, vol 1, main report. http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/how/evaluation/evaluation_reports/reports/sector/951660_vol1_en.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2015
FAO (2009) State of the world’s forests. FAO, Rome
GIZ (2011) Capacity works – the management model for sustainable development. Updated manual, Eschborn
GIZ (2013) Guidelines on designing and using a results-based monitoring sytem (RbM system)
GIZ (2014a) Methodological guidelines for feasibility studies of technical cooperation measures on behalf of BMZ
GIZ (2014b) Annotated PEV reporting structure
GIZ (2015) Cooperation management for practitioners, managing social change with capacity works, Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. ISBN 978-3-658-06275-0 ISBN 978-3-658-06276-7 (eBook)
GIZ (n.d.) Capacity works. https://www.giz.de/expertise/html/4619.html. Accessed 24 Apr 2015
JICA (n.d.) Efforts to improve the rating system. http://www.jica.go.jp/english/our_work/evaluation/oda_loan/post/2006/pdf/other05.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2015
OECD-DAC (2008) http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/41699327.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2015
OED (2015) Organisation for economic co-operation and development. http://www.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/daccriteriaforevaluatingdevelopmentassistance.htm. Accessed 24 Apr 2015
Project Management Institute (2015) What is a project management? http://www.pmi.org/About-Us/About-Us-What-is-Project-Management.aspx. Accessed 24 Apr 2015
Sheperd G (1998) Germany. The EU tropical forestry sourcebook. Overseas Development Institute/European Commission, London. http://www.odi.org.uk/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/5017.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2015
The World Bank Group (2007) Module 2: results chain. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTUKRAINE/Resources/328335-1212401346836/Module2ResultsChainEng.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2015
UN (2010) Results-based management handbook. Strengthening RBM harmonization for improved development results. http://www.un.cv/files/UNDG%20RBM%20Handbook.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Sepp, S., Mann, S. (2016). Forestry Project Management. In: Pancel, L., Köhl, M. (eds) Tropical Forestry Handbook. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54601-3_244
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54601-3_244
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54600-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54601-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences