Abstract
This contribution represents a continuation of a series of papers by the authors concerned with the multiscale solution of boundary-value problems corresponding to elliptic differential equations such as Laplace equation (Freeden and Mayer, Appl Comput Harmonic Anal 14:195–237, 2003; Acta Geod Geophys Hung 41:55–86, 2006), Helmholtz equation (Freeden et al., Numer Funct Anal Optim 24:747–782, 2003; Ilyasov, A tree algorithm for Helmholtz potential wavelets on non-smooth surfaces: theoretical background and application to seismic data postprocessing. PhD thesis, Geomathematics Group, Department of Mathematics, University of Kaiserslautern, 2011), Cauchy-Navier equation (Abeyratne, Cauchy-Navier wavelet solvers and their application in deformation analysis. PhD thesis, Geomathematics Group, University of Kaiserslautern, 2003; Abeyratne et al., J Appl Math 12:605–645, 2003), and Maxwell equations (Freeden and Mayer, Int J Wavelets Multiresolut Inf Process 5:417–449, 2007). The essential idea is to transform the differential equation into an integral equation by standard surface layer potentials and to use certain regularizations of the kernels of the layer potentials as scaling kernel functions. In this context, the distance of a parallel surface to the boundary acts as the scale parameter. The scaling kernel functions are defined as restrictions of the kernel values of layer potentials to the parallel surface. Wavelet kernel functions in scale discrete case are canonically obtained as the difference between two consecutive scaling functions. The solution process is formulated in such a way that an approximation of a boundary function on a regular surface simultaneously yields the solution of the boundary-value problem itself. In the case of Stokes flow – as discussed here – the kernels are of vectorial/tensorial nature, satisfying the differential equation in each variable. Stokes flow leads to significant applications of geomathematical relevance (e.g., in oceanography, meteorology).
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abeyratne MK (2003) Cauchy-Navier wavelet solvers and their application in deformation analysis. PhD thesis, Geomathematics Group, University of Kaiserslautern
Abeyratne MK, Freeden W, Mayer C (2003) Multiscale deformation analysis by Cauchy-Navier wavelets. J Appl Math 12:605–645
Atkinson KE (1997) The numerical solution of integral equations of the second kind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
Blatter C (1998) Wavelets – Eine Einführung. Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig
Brakhage H, Werner P (1965) Über das Dirichlet’sche Aussenraumproblem für die Helmholtz’sche Schwingungsgleichung. Arch Math 16:325–329
Breuer J, Steinbach O, Wendland WL (2002) A wavelet boundary element method for the symmetric boundary integral formulation. In: Proceedings of IABEM 2002, Austin
Colton C, Kress R (1992) Inverse acoustic and electromagnetic scattering theory. Springer, Berlin/New York
Dahmen W (1997) Wavelet and multiscale methods for operator equations. Acta Numer 6:55–228
Dahmen W, Kurdila AJ, Oswald P (1997a) Multiscale wavelet methods for partial differential equations (wavelet analysis and its applications). Academic, New York
Dahmen W, Kurdila AJ, Oswald P (eds) (1997b) Multiscale wavelet methods for partial differential equations. Wavelet analysis and its applications. Academic, San Diego
Daubechies I (1992) Ten lectures on wavelets. SIAM, New York
Faxen H (1929) Fredholm’sche Integralgleichungen zu der Hydrodynamik zäher Flüssigkeiten. Ark Mat Astr Fys 21A:1–40
Fischer TM (1982) An integral equation procedure for the exterior 3-D slow viscous flow. Integral Equ Oper Theory 5:490–505
Freeden W (1980) On the approximation of external gravitational potential with closed systems of (trial) functions. Bull Geod 54:1–20
Freeden W (1998) The uncertainty principle and its role in physical geodesy. In: Freeden W (ed) Progress in geodetic science. Shaker, Aachen, pp 225–236
Freeden W (1999) Multiscale modelling of spaceborne geodata. B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart/Leipzig
Freeden W, Gerhards C (2013) Geomathematically oriented potential theory. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
Freeden W, Gutting M (2013) Special functions of mathematical (geo-)physics. Birkhäuser, Basel/Heidelberg
Freeden W, Mayer C (2003) Wavelets generated by layer potentials. Appl Comput Harmonic Anal 14:195–237
Freeden W, Mayer C (2006) Multiscale solution for the Molodensky problem on regular telluroidal surfaces. Acta Geod Geophys Hung 41:55–86
Freeden W, Mayer C (2007) Wavelet modelling of tangential vector fields on regular surfaces by means of Mie potentials. Int J Wavelets Multiresolut Inf Process 5:417–449
Freeden W, Michel V (2004) Multiscale potential theory: with applications to geoscience. Birkhäuser, Boston
Freeden W, Schreiner M (2009) Spherical functions of mathematical geosciences: a scalar, vectorial, and tensorial setup. Springer, Heidelberg
Freeden W, Windheuser U (1996) Spherical wavelet transform and its discretization. Adv Comput Math 5:51–94
Freeden W, Gervens T, Schreiner M (1994) Tensor spherical harmonics and tensor spherical splines. Manuscr Geod 19:70–100
Freeden W, Gervens T, Schreiner M (1998) Constructive approximation on the sphere (with applications to geomathematics). Oxford Science Publications/Clarendon, Oxford
Freeden W, Mayer C, Schreiner M (2003) Tree algorithms in wavelet approximation by Helmholtz potential operators. Numer Funct Anal Optim 24:747–782
Goswami JC, Chan AK (1999) Fundamentals of wavelets: theory, algorithms, and applications. Wiley, New York
Günter NM (1957) Die Potentialtheorie und ihre Anwendung auf Grundaufgaben der Mathematischen Physik. B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart
Hebeker F-K (1986) Efficient boundary element methods for three-dimensional exterior viscous flows. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ 2:273–297
Heuser H, Funktionalanalysis: Theorie und Anwendungen. B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart (1992)
Ilyasov M (2011) A tree algorithm for Helmholtz potential wavelets on non-smooth surfaces: theoretical background and application to seismic data postprocessing. PhD thesis, Geomathematics Group, University of Kaiserslautern
Kellogg OD (1967) Foundation of potential theory. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York
Kersten H (1980) Grenz- und Sprungrelationen für Potentiale mit qudratsummierbarer Flächenbelegung. Resultate der Mathematik 3:17–24
Konik M (2002) A fully discrete wavelet Galerkin boundary element method in three dimensions. Logos Verlag, Berlin
Kress R (1989) Linear integral equations. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York
Kupradze VD (1965) Potential methods in the theory of elasticity. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem
Ladyzhenskaja OA (1969) The mathematical theory of viscous incompressible flow. Gordon and Breach, New York
Lage C, Schwab C (1999) Wavelet Galerkin algorithms for boundary integral equations. SIAM J Sci Comput 20:2195–2222
Lax PD (1954) Symmetrizable linear transformations. Commun Pure Appl Math 7:633–647
Leis R (1964) Zur Eindeutigkeit der Randwertaufgabe der Helmholtz’schen Schwingungsgleichung. Math Z 85:141–153
Louis A, Maaß P, Rieder A (1994) Wavelets. Teubner Verlag, Stuttgart
Mallat S (1998) A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic, San Diego/San Francisko/New York
Mayer C (2007) A wavelet approach to the Stokes problem. Habilitation thesis, Geomathematics Group, University of Kaiserslautern
Müller C (1969) Foundation of the mathematical theory of electromagnetic waves. Die Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften in Einzeldarstellungen, Bd. 155. Springer, Heidelberg
Odqvist FKG (1930) Über die Randwertaufgaben der Hydrodynamik zäher Flüssigkeiten. Math Z 32:329–375
Panich OI (1965) On the question of the solvability of the exterior boundary-value problem for the wave equation and Maxwell’s equation. Russ Math Surv 20:221–226
Power H (1987) On Rallison and Acrivos solution for the defomation and burst of a viscous drop in an extensional flow. J Fluid Mech 185:547–550
Power H, Miranda G (1987) Second kind integral equation formulation of Stokes’ flows past a particle of arbitrary shape. SIAM J Appl Math 47:689–698
Power H, Wrobel LC (1995) Boundary integral methods in fluid mechanics. Computational Mechanics Publications, Southampton/Boston
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendices
We conclude our work with a list of appendices.
Regular Surfaces
First, the main geometrical reference object discussed in this thesis, i.e., a regular surface, is defined, and certain properties are explained in more detail (see also Müller 1969; Freeden and Gerhards 2013):
Definition 13.
A subset \(\Sigma \subset \mathbb{R}^{3}\) is called a regular surface in \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\) if the following properties are fulfilled: 1. \(\Sigma \) is a closed and compact surface free of double points. 2. \(\Sigma \) divides the Euclidean space \(\mathbb{R}^{3}\) into the bounded inner region \(\Sigma _{\mathrm{int}}\) and the unbounded outer region \(\Sigma _{\mathrm{ext}}\) with \(\mathbb{R}^{3} = \Sigma _{\mathrm{int}}\,\dot{ \cup }\, \Sigma \,\dot{ \cup }\, \Sigma _{\mathrm{ext}}\). 3. The origin is in \(\Sigma _{\mathrm{int}}\), \(0 \in \Sigma _{\mathrm{int}}\). 4. \(\Sigma \) is locally of class C(2).
The fourth property means that, for each point \(x \in \Sigma \), there exists a neighborhood \(U(x) \subset \mathbb{R}^{3}\) of x such that \(\Sigma \cap U(x)\) can be mapped bijectively onto an open subset \(V \subset \mathbb{R}^{2}\) and that this mapping is twice continuously differentiable. The fourth property of Definition 13 is equivalent to the existence of a continuously differentiable unit normal field ν on \(\Sigma \) pointing, by definition, into the outer space \(\Sigma _{\mathrm{ext}}\).
Examples of a regular surface are the sphere \(\Omega _{R}\) with radius R > 0, the ellipsoid, and as geoscientifically relevant example the real (regular) Earth’s surface (obtained by modern GPS technology).
Definition 14.
Let \(\nu: \Sigma \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{3}\) denote the unit normal field on \(\Sigma \). Then the set
generates a parallel surface which is exterior to \(\Sigma \) for τ > 0 and interior for τ < 0.
It is well known (see, e.g., Müller 1969; Freeden and Gerhards 2013) that if \(\left \vert \tau \right \vert\) is sufficiently small, then the regularity of \(\Sigma \) implies the regularity of \(\Sigma (\tau )\). According to our regularity assumptions, imposed on \(\Sigma \), the functions
and
are bounded. Hence, there exists a constant M > 0 such that, for all \(x,y \in \Sigma \),
Moreover, it is easy to see that
provided that \(\left \vert \tau \right \vert\) and \(\left \vert \sigma \right \vert\) are sufficiently small.
In order to separate members of the class \(c(\Sigma )\) of continuous vector fields on \(\Sigma \) into their tangential and normal parts with respect to a regular surface, we introduce the projection operators p nor and p tan by
Hence, the corresponding subspaces of \(\mathrm{c}(\Sigma )\) are given by
The spaces \(\mathrm{c}_{\mathrm{nor}}^{(p)}(\Sigma )\) and \(\mathrm{c}_{\mathrm{tan}}^{(p)}(\Sigma )\), 0 ≤ p ≤ ∞ are definable in the same fashion.
The set of vector fields \(f: \Sigma \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) which are measurable and for which
is denoted by \(l^{p}(\Sigma )\), where dω(x) denotes the surface element on \(\Sigma \) (note that in the case of \(\Sigma = \Omega _{R}\) with radius R > 0, we write dω R (x) instead of \(\mathrm{d}\omega _{\Omega _{R}}(x)\) and dω instead of dω 1 in the case R = 1).
The definition of the normal and the tangential operator can be extended in canonical way to vector fields in \(l^{2}(\Sigma )\) by a density argument. Hence, we define
Clearly, we have the orthogonal decomposition
Kernel Functions
When we introduce layer potentials with respect to a regular surface, scalar- and tensor-valued kernel functions defined on the regular surface are of particular importance. Thus, they are discussed in the following.
Definition 15.
Let \(\Sigma \) be a regular surface. A bivariate scalar kernel function \(K: \mathbb{R}^{3} \times \mathbb{R}^{3} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) is called weakly continuous if K is continuous for all \(x,y \in \Sigma \) with x ≠ y, and there exist positive constants M and 0 < α ≤ 2 such that, for all \(x,y \in \Sigma \), x ≠ y, we have
The pair \(\left < \mathrm{C}^{(0)}(\Sigma ),\mathrm{C}^{(0)}(\Sigma )\right >\) with \(\Sigma \) being a regular surface, together with the \(\mathop{\L }^{2}(\Sigma )\)-inner product, is a dual system. Thus, the first requirements of the theorem of Fredholm (see, e.g., Kress 1989; Heuser 1992) is fulfilled. To finally apply this theorem, we need compact operators on the space \(\mathrm{C}^{(0)}(\Sigma )\).
Theorem 22.
Let \(\Sigma \) be a regular surface and let the integral operator \(A:\mathrm{ C}^{(0)}(\Sigma ) \rightarrow \mathrm{ C}^{(0)}(\Sigma )\) be given by
where the kernel K is continuous or weakly singular. Then the operator A is compact on \(\mathrm{C}^{(0)}(\Sigma )\) .
For a proof of this theorem, the reader is referred to, e.g., Kupradze (1965) and Kress (1989).
Theorem 23.
Let \(\Sigma \) be a regular surface. Assume the kernel K to be weakly continuous with constant α. Furthermore, let us assume that there exists an \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) and a constant M > 0 such that
for all \(x_{1},x_{2} \in \mathbb{R}^{3}\) and \(y \in \Sigma \) with \(2\left \vert x_{1} - x_{2}\right \vert \leq \left \vert x_{1} - y\right \vert\) . Then the scalar potential \(U: \mathbb{R}^{3} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) formally defined by
with layer density \(F \in \mathrm{ C}^{(0)}(\Sigma )\) belongs to the Hölder space \(\mathrm{C}^{(0,\beta )}(\mathbb{R}^{3})\) for all 0 < β ≤α if 0 < α < 1, for all 0 < β < 1 if α = 1, and for all 0 < β ≤ 1 if 1 < α < 2.
Theorem 24.
Let \(\Sigma \) be a regular surface and let \(x_{0} \in \Sigma \) . Assume the kernel K to be continuous for all \(x \in D_{\tau _{0}}\) , \(y \in \Sigma \) , x≠y with \(D_{\tau _{0}}\) given by
and assume that there exists a constant C > 0 such that for all \(x \in D_{\tau _{0}}\) , \(y \in \Sigma \) , x≠y, we have
Furthermore, let us assume that there exists an \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) such that
for all \(x_{1},x_{2} \in D_{\tau _{0}}\) , \(y \in \Sigma \) , x≠y with \(2\left \vert x_{1} - x_{2}\right \vert \leq \left \vert x_{1} - y\right \vert\) , and that
for all \(z \in \Sigma \) , \(x \in D_{\tau _{0}}\) and for all 0 < r < R, where R is chosen sufficiently small such that \(B_{R}(z) \cap \Sigma \) is still connected. We formally define, for \(F \in \mathrm{ C}^{(0,\alpha )}(\Sigma )\) ,
Then the potential U is continuous and belongs to the Hölder space \(\mathrm{C}^{(0,\alpha )}(D_{\tau _{0}})\) .
The pair \(\left < \mathrm{c}^{(0)}(\Sigma ),\mathrm{c}^{(0)}(\Sigma )\right >\) together with the \(\mathop{\l }^{2}(\Sigma )\)-inner product is a dual system. In order to use the theorem of Fredholm, we finally need compact operators on the space \(\mathrm{c}^{(0)}(\Sigma )\). It is clear that Definition 15, Theorems 22, and 23 can canonically be extended to the case of a tensor kernel function k.
Definition 16.
Let \(\Sigma \) be a regular surface. A tensorial kernel function \(\mathbf{k}: \mathbb{R}^{3} \times \mathbb{R}^{3} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{3\times 3}\) is said to be weakly continuous if k is defined and continuous for all \(x,y \in \Sigma \) with x ≠ y, and there exist positive constants M and 0 < α ≤ 2 such that for all \(x,y \in \Sigma \), x ≠ y, we have
Corollary 9.
Let \(\Sigma \) be a regular surface.
-
1.
Let the integral operator \(A:\mathrm{ c}^{(0)}(\Sigma ) \rightarrow \mathrm{ c}^{(0)}(\Sigma )\) be given by
$$\displaystyle{ (Af)(x) =\int _{\Sigma }\mathbf{k}(x,y)f(y)\,\mathrm{d}\omega (y),\quad x \in \Sigma, }$$(408)where the tensor kernel k is continuous or weakly singular. Then the operator A is compact on \(\mathrm{c}^{(0)}(\Sigma )\) .
-
2.
Let us assume that the tensor kernel k be weakly continuous with constant α. Furthermore, let us assume that there exists \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) and a constant M > 0 such that
$$\displaystyle{ \left \vert \mathbf{k}(x_{1},y) -\mathbf{k}(x_{2},y)\right \vert \leq M\sum _{j=1}^{N} \frac{\left \vert x_{1} - x_{2}\right \vert ^{j}} {\left \vert x_{1} - y\right \vert ^{2+j-\alpha }} }$$(409)for all \(x_{1},x_{2} \in \mathbb{R}^{3}\) and \(y \in \Sigma \) with \(2\left \vert x_{1} - x_{2}\right \vert \leq \left \vert x_{1} - y\right \vert\) . Then the vector potential \(u: \mathbb{R}^{3} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{3}\) defined by
$$\displaystyle{ u(x) =\int _{\Sigma }\mathbf{k}(x,y)f(y)\,\mathrm{d}\omega (y),\quad x \in \mathbb{R}^{3}, }$$(410)with layer density \(f \in \mathrm{ c}^{(0)}(\Sigma )\) is an element of the Hölder space \(\mathrm{c}^{(0,\beta )}(\mathbb{R}^{3})\) with the same relations between β and α as given in Theorem 23 .
-
3.
Let us assume that the tensor kernel k be continuous for all \(x \in D_{\tau _{0}}\) , \(y \in \Sigma \) , x≠y, where \(D_{\tau _{0}}\) is defined in Theorem 24 , and let us assume that there exists a constant C > 0 such that for all \(x \in D_{\tau _{0}}\) , \(y \in \Sigma \) , x≠y, we have
$$\displaystyle{ \left \vert \mathbf{k}(x,y)\right \vert \leq \frac{C} {\left \vert x - y\right \vert ^{2}}\,. }$$(411)Furthermore, assume that there exists \(N \in \mathbb{N}\) such that
$$\displaystyle{ \left \vert \mathbf{k}(x_{1},y) -\mathbf{k}(x_{2},y)\right \vert \leq C\sum _{j=1}^{N} \frac{\left \vert x_{1} - x_{2}\right \vert ^{j}} {\left \vert x_{1} - y\right \vert ^{2+j}} }$$(412)for all \(x_{1},x_{2} \in D_{\tau _{0}}\) , \(y \in \Sigma \) , x≠y with \(2\left \vert x_{1} - x_{2}\right \vert \leq \left \vert x_{1} - y\right \vert\) , and that
$$\displaystyle{ \left \vert \int _{\Sigma \setminus (B_{r}(z)\cap \Sigma )}\mathbf{k}(x,y)\,\mathrm{d}\omega (y)\right \vert \leq C }$$(413)for all \(z \in \Sigma \) , \(x \in D_{\tau _{0}}\) and for all 0 < r < R. We define, for \(f \in \mathrm{ c}^{(0,\alpha )}(\Sigma )\) , the vector potential u by
$$\displaystyle{ u(x) =\int _{\Sigma }\mathbf{k}(x,y)\big(f(y) - f(z)\big)\,\mathrm{d}\omega (y),\quad x \in D_{\tau _{0}}\,. }$$(414)Then the vector potential u is continuous and belongs to the space \(\mathrm{c}^{(0,\alpha )}(D_{\tau _{0}})\) .
Scaling Functions and Wavelets
In the following, we present some helpful auxiliary material. In particular, we are interested in the explicit representations of the \(\Sigma \)-tensor scaling functions and wavelets presented in Sect. 4.1 as well as those of the second kind as introduced in Sect. 4.4. Furthermore, we give some graphical illustrations of the tensor scaling functions and wavelets.
4.1 Scaling Functions
Tensorial scaling functions on regular surfaces have been introduced in Corollary 7 and Definition 5. Their explicit representations are, for the tensorial case, given by
where τ > 0 is the scale parameter and \(x,y \in \Sigma \). Graphical illustrations of the \(\Sigma \)-tensor scaling function of type i = 5, \(\boldsymbol{\Phi }_{\tau }^{5}\), for different values of the scale parameter τ can be found in Fig. 7.
4.2 Wavelet Functions
The \(\Sigma \)-tensor wavelet functions corresponding to the \(\Sigma \)-tensor scaling functions have been, for the weight function α(τ) = τ −1, defined in Definition 6 by
Their explicit representations can be calculated to be
for \(x,y \in \Sigma \) and τ > 0. In Sect. 4.3, we introduced a scale discretization which led to scale discrete \(\Sigma \)-tensor wavelet functions of type i. They are given, for \(i = 1,\ldots,6\), by
where the sequence \(\{\tau _{j}\}_{j\in \mathbb{Z}}\) is a discretization of the scale interval (0, ∞). The graphical illustrations of the scale discrete \(\Sigma \)-tensor scaling function of type i = 5, \(\boldsymbol{\Psi }_{\tau _{ j}}^{5}\), can be found in Fig. 8.
4.3 Scaling Functions of the Second Kind
\(\Sigma \)-tensor scaling functions of the second kind have been defined in Definition 10. For τ > 0, they are defined by
where the scalar kernels \(\Phi _{\tau }^{i}\), i = 2, 3, 5, 6 are given by
for \(x,y \in \Sigma \). Graphical illustrations of the \(\Sigma \)-tensor scaling function of the second kind of type i = 5, \(\tilde{\boldsymbol{\Phi }}_{\tau }^{5}\), for different values of the scale parameter \(\tau\) can be found in Fig. 9.
4.4 Wavelet Functions of the Second Kind
The \(\Sigma \)-tensor wavelet functions of the second kind corresponding to the \(\Sigma \)-tensor scaling functions of the second kind presented in Appendix C.3 have been, for the weight function α(τ) = τ −1, τ > 0 and i = 2, 3, 5, 6, defined in Definition 11 by
They can be calculated explicitly using the representations of the tensor scaling functions of the second kind given in Definition 10. It easily follows that
with the scalar kernels \(\Psi _{\tau }^{i}: \Sigma \times \Sigma \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) given by
and the scalar kernels \(\Phi _{\tau }^{i}\), i = 2, 3, 5, 6, given in Appendix C. Explicit representations of the scalar wavelet functions \(\Psi _{\tau }^{i}\) can be calculated to be (see also Freeden and Mayer 2003)
for τ > 0 and \(x,y \in \Sigma \).
In Sect. 4.4, we have also defined scale discrete \(\Sigma \)-tensor wavelet functions of the second kind of type i. They are given, for \(i = 1,\ldots,6\), by
where the sequence \(\{\tau _{j}\}_{j\in \mathbb{Z}}\) is a discretization of the scale interval (0, ∞). Some graphical illustrations of the scale discrete \(\Sigma \)-tensor scaling function of the second kind of type i = 5, \(\tilde{\boldsymbol{\Psi }}_{\tau _{j}}^{5}\), can be found in Fig. 10.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Mayer, C., Freeden, W. (2015). Stokes Problem, Layer Potentials and Regularizations, and Multiscale Applications. In: Freeden, W., Nashed, M., Sonar, T. (eds) Handbook of Geomathematics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54551-1_95
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54551-1_95
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54550-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54551-1
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering