Skip to main content

Foreign Language Teachers as Instructional Designers: Customizing Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Technology

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

In second or foreign language (L2) education, there is a dire need to increase student exposure and interaction with the target language (input) so that they can initiate or improve their learning (e.g., Ellis 1997). This is particularly true in foreign language environments in which students may not encounter the target language outside the classroom (Wang and Castro 2010). Mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) is gaining popularity for just this: it encourages learners to engage in learning without limitations of time and space (Miangah and Nezarat, Int J Distrib Parallel Syst 3(1):309–319, 2012). Although there exists an abundance of software applications for L2 learning, they are generally pre-made and designed for the general population of teachers and learners without considering individual interests and abilities. To address this issue, a recent proposal by Barcomb, Grimshaw, and Cardoso (Language 2(3):8, 2017) categorizes three levels of teacher involvement in the development of MALL materials: (1) adapting pre-made resources, (2) modifying resources, and (3) creating resources. In this chapter, we illustrate the application of the abovementioned proposal within the framework of each level by exploring design options that teachers can make by using customizable text-to-speech technology to increase student interaction with the target L2 outside the classroom. The authors suggest that this approach has the potential to address some of the limitations that characterize the traditional L2 classroom, to encourage teachers to create relevant and enticing materials for their learners, and to motivate them to take control of their MALL-enhanced pedagogical experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Aldrich, C. 2005. Learning by doing: A comprehensive guide to simulations, computer games, and pedagogy in e-learning and other educational experiences. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W., and P. Trofimovich. 2001. Does perception precede production? Evidence from Korean-English bilinguals. The Linguistic Association of Canada and the United States Forum 27: 273–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barcomb, M., and E. Sheepy. 2017. Don’t quit now! Monitoring learner volatility and willingness to communicate in a gamified course. In Paper presented at the Association Canadienne de Linguistique Appliquée/Canadian Association of applied linguistics annual conference. Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barcomb, M., J. Grimshaw, and W. Cardoso. 2017. I can’t program! Customizable mobile language-learning resources for researchers and practitioners. Language 2 (3): 8. Retrieved from http://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/2/3/8/htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, R.M., P.C. Abrami, Y. Lou, E. Borokhovski, A. Wade, L. Wozney, and B. Huang. 2004. How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research 74 (3): 379–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bione, T., J. Grimshaw, and W. Cardoso. in press. An evaluation of text-to-speech synthesizers as pedagogical tools for pronunciation instruction: The “foreign” language context. In Proceedings of the European Association for Computer-Assisted Language Learning: CALL in a Climate of Change, ed. K. Borthwick, L. Bradley, and S. Thouësny. Dublin: Research-publishing.net.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R.J. 2013. Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogost, I. 2011. How to do things with videogames. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bossemeyer, R.W., Jr., and M.L. Hardzinski. 2001. Talking call waiting: An application of text-to-speech. International Journal of Speech Technology 4 (1): 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandl, K. 2002. The integration of internet-based reading materials into the foreign language curriculum: From teacher- to student-centered approaches. Language Learning and Technology 6 (3): 87–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carliner, S. 2002. Choices and challenges: Considerations for designing electronic performance support systems. Technical Communication 49 (4): 411–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carliner, S. 2015. Training design basics. Alexandria, VA: ATD Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caws, C., and M.J. Hamel. 2016. Cutting-edge theories and techniques for LCI in the context of CALL. In Language-learner computer interactions: Theory, methodology and CALL applications, ed. C. Caws and M.J. Hamel, 1–16. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L., and C. Muñoz. 2016. The foreign language classroom: Current perspectives and future considerations. The Modern Language Journal 100 (1): 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. 1997. SLA research and language teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. 2014. Learning by expanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P.A., and T.J. Newby. 1993. Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly 6 (4): 50–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa Flores, J.F. 2015. Using gamification to enhance second language learning. Digital Education Review 27: 32–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin-Jones, R. 2014. Games in language learning: Opportunities and challenges. Language Learning & Technology 18 (2): 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin-Jones, R. 2015. The evolving roles of language teachers: Trained coders, local researchers, global citizens. Language Learning & Technology 19 (1): 10–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handley, Z. 2009. Is text-to-speech synthesis ready for use in computer-assisted language learning? Speech Communication 51 (10): 906–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S.D. 1985. The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London/New York: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S.D. 2003. Explorations in language acquisition and use. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuure, L., T. Molin-Juustila, T. Keisanen, M. Riekki, N. Iivari, and M. Kinnula. 2016. Switching perspectives: From a language teacher to a designer of language learning with new technologies. Computer Assisted Language Learning 29 (5): 925–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C., Y. Yeung, and J. Hu. 2016. University student and teacher perceptions of teacher roles in promoting autonomous language learning with technology outside the classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning 29 (4): 703–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liakin, D., W. Cardoso, and N. Liakina. 2017. The pedagogical use of mobile speech synthesis: Focus on French liaison. Computer Assisted Language Learning 30 (3–4): 348–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenney, S., and T. Reeves. 2012. Conducting educational design research. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miangah, T.M., and A. Nezarat. 2012. Mobile-assisted language learning. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems 3 (1): 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nusbaum, H.C., A.L. Francis, and A.S. Henly. 1995. Measuring the naturalness of synthetic speech. International Journal of Speech Technology 2 (1): 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor-Pina, H., R. Satorre-Cuerda, R. Molina-Carmona, F.J. Gallego-Durán, and F. Llorens-Largo. 2015. Can Moodle be used for structural gamification? In Proceedings of INTED2015 conference. Retrieved from http://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/45848/1/Structural-gamificationMoodle-INTED-2015-308.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinders, H., and S. Wattana. 2014. Can I say something? The effects of digital game play on willingness to communicate. Language Learning & Technology 18 (2): 101–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R.A. 2001. A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: A history of instructional media. Educational Technology Research and Development 49 (1): 53–64. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/journal/11423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R., M. Molenda, and L. Rezabek. 2008. Facilitating learning. In Educational technology: A definition with commentary, ed. A. Januszewski and M. Molenda, 15–48. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roblyer, M.D. 2003. Integrating educational technology into teaching. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swain, M. 2000. The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Sociocultural theory and second language learning, ed. J.P. Lantolf, 97–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, J. 2013. ‘Just’ playing games? A look at the use of digital games for language learning. The Language Educator 8: 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R.I. 2012. Improving L2 listeners’ perception of English vowels: A computer-mediated approach. Language Learning 62 (4): 1231–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traxler, J. 2007. Defining, discussing and evaluating Mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ…. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 8 (2): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., and C. Castro. 2010. Classroom interaction and output. English Language Teaching 3 (2): 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Barcomb .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Barcomb, M., Grimshaw, J., Cardoso, W. (2019). Foreign Language Teachers as Instructional Designers: Customizing Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Technology. In: Zhang, Y., Cristol, D. (eds) Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_130-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41981-2_130-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41981-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41981-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics