Abstract
The survival and well-being of human civilization depends on water. Human civilization is especially vulnerable to large variations in the water cycle such as flood and drought that disrupts food supplies and can cause havoc to day-to-day operations. Many of these extreme events have occurred in recent years including large droughts and extreme floods in many parts of the world. The looming threat of climate change has the additional potential to make the impacts of extreme water cycle events an even greater threat to society. The ability to have foreknowledge of these extremes in the water cycle can provide time for preparations to reduce the negative impacts of these extremes on society. Predictions of these extreme events require models of the hydrometeorological system, including all its associated uncertainties, and appropriate observations systems to provide input data to these models. Ensemble forecasts using statistical and physically based models that also account for forecast uncertainties have great potential to make the needed predictions of future hydrometeorological events.
This chapter discusses the basis for predictability, predictive scales, and uncertainty associated with hydrometeorological prediction. Although much uncertainty may be associated with some hydrometeorological predictions, ensemble forecasting techniques offer a way to quantify this uncertainty making it possible to have more useful predictions for decision makers and for the ultimate benefit to society.
References
M. Cornick, B. Hunt, E. Ott, H. Kurtuldu, M.F. Schatz, State and parameter estimation of spatiotemporally chaotic systems illustrated by an application to Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Chaos. Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear. Sci. 19, 13108 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3072780
G.N. Day, Extended streamflow forecasting using NWSRFS. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 111, 157–170 (1985)
A.P.J. de Roo, B. Gouweleeuw, J. Thielen, J. Bartholmes, P. Bongioannini-Cerlini, E. Todini, P.D. Bates, M. Horritt, N. Hunter, K. Beven, F. Pappenberger, E. Heise, G. Rivin, M. Hils, A. Hollingsworth, B. Holst, J. Kwadijk, P. Reggiani, M. Van Dijk, K. Sattler, E. Sprokkereef, Development of a European flood forecasting system. Int. J. River Basin Manag. 1, 49–59 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2003.9635192
E.S. Epstein, Stochastic dynamic prediction. Tellus 21, 739–759 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1969.tb00483.x
G. Evensen, The ensemble Kalman filter for combined state and parameter estimation. IEEE Control. Syst. Mag. 29, 83–104 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCS.2009.932223
L.S.R. Froude, L. Bengtsson, K.I. Hodges, Atmospheric predictability revisited. Tellus Ser. A Dyn. Meteorol. Oceanogr. 65, 19022 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v65i0.19022
L. Goddard, S.J. Mason, S.E. Zebiak, C.F. Ropelewski, R. Basher, M.A. Cane, Current approaches to seasonal to interannual climate predictions. Int. J. Climatol. 21, 1111–1152 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.636
TM. Hamill, Comments on “Calibrated Surface Temperature Forecasts from the Canadian Ensemble Prediction System Using Bayesian Model Averaging.” Mon. Weather. Rev. 135, 4226–4230 (2007).
A. Hamlet, D. Lettenmaier, Columbia River streamflow forecasting based on ENSO and PDO climate signals. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 125, 333–341 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1999)125:6(333)
B. Hoskins, The potential for skill across the range of the seamless weather-climate prediction problem: a stimulus for our science. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 139, 573–584 (2013).
T.G. Huntington, Evidence for intensification of the global water cycle: Review and synthesis. J. Hydrol. 319, 83–95 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.003
T.R. Karl, B.E. Gleason, M.J. Menne, J.R. McMahon, R.R. Heim, M.J. Brewer, K.E. Kunkel, D.S. Arndt, J.L. Privette, J.J. Bates, P.Y. Groisman, D.R. Easterling, U.S. temperature and drought: Recent anomalies and trends. Eos. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 93, 473–474 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1029/2012EO470001
R. Krzysztofowicz, Why should a forecaster and a decision maker use Bayes theorem. Water Resour. Res. 19, 327–336 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1029/WR019i002p00327
R. Krzysztofowicz, The case for probabilistic forecasting in hydrology. J. Hydrol. 249, 2–9 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00420-6
C.E. Leith, Theoretical skill of Monte Carlo forecasts. Mon. Weather Rev. 102, 409–418 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1974)102<0409:TSOMCF>2.0.CO;2
C.E. Leith, R.H. Kraichnan, Predictability of Turbulent Flows. J. Atmos. Sci. 29, 1041–1058 (1972).
H.B. Li, L.F. Luo, E.F. Wood, J. Schaake, The role of initial conditions and forcing uncertainties in seasonal hydrologic forecasting. J. Geophys. Res. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010969
E.N. Lorenz, A study of the predictability of a 28-variable atmospheric model. Tellus 17, 321–333 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1965.tb01424.x
E.N. Lorenz, Atmospheric predictability as revealed by naturally occurring analogues. J. Atmos. Sci. 26, 636–646 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1969)26<636:APARBN>2.0.CO;2
E.N. Lorenz, Atmospheric predictability experiments with a large numerical model. Tellus 34, 505–513 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1982.tb01839.x
L. Marchi, M. Borga, E. Preciso, E. Gaume, Characterisation of selected extreme flash floods in Europe and implications for flood risk management. J. Hydrol. 394, 118–133 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.017
Merriam-Webster Prediction, In: Merriam-Webster.com. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/canonicalform
K.C. Mo, S. Shukla, D.P. Lettenmaier, L.-C. Chen, Do climate forecast system (CFSv2) forecasts improve seasonal soil moisture prediction? Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L23703 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053598
F. Molteni, R. Buizza, T.N. Palmer, T. Petroliagis, The ECMWF ensemble prediction system: methodology and validation. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 122, 73–119 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712252905
T.N. Palmer, D.L.T. Anderson, The prospects for seasonal forecasting – A review paper. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 120, 755–793 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712051802
J.K. Roundy, X. Yuan, J. Schaake, E.F. Wood, A framework for diagnosing seasonal prediction through canonical event analysis. Mon. Weather Rev. 143, 2404–2418 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00190.1
J. Schaake, J. Demargne, R. Hartman, M. Mullusky, E. Welles, L. Wu, H. Herr, X. Fan, D.J. Seo, Precipitation and temperature ensemble forecasts from single-value forecasts. Hydrol. Earth. Syst. Sci. Discuss. 4, 655–717 (2007).
J. Sheffield, E.F. Wood, Global trends and variability in soil moisture and drought characteristics, 1950–2000, from observation-driven simulations of the terrestrial hydrologic cycle. J. Clim. 21, 432–458 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JCLI1822.1
J.A. Smith, M.L. Baeck, G. Villarini, D.B. Wright, W. Krajewski, Extreme flood response: The June 2008 flooding in Iowa. J. Hydrometeorol. 14, 1810–1825 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-0191.1
E.A. Stallings, The Benefits of Hydrologic Forecasting (Silver Spring, Maryland, 1997)
D.M. Straus, J. Shukla, The known, the unknown and the unknowable in the predictability of weather. 175, 20 (2005) [Available from the Center for Ocean– Land–Atmosphere Studies, 4041 Powder Mill Rd., Suite 302, Calverton, MD 20705].
Z. Toth, E. Kalnay, Z. Toth, E. Kalnay, Ensemble forecasting at NCEP and the breeding method. Mon. Weather Rev. 125, 3297–3319 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<3297:EFANAT>2.0.CO;2
G. Villarini, J.A. Smith, R. Vitolo, D.B. Stephenson, On the temporal clustering of US floods and its relationship to climate teleconnection patterns. Int. J. Climatol. 33, 629–640 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3458
X. Yuan, E.F. Wood, J.K. Roundy, M. Pan, CFSv2-based seasonal hydroclimatic forecasts over the conterminous United States. J. Clim. 26, 4828–4847 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00683.1
J.H. Zar, Spearman rank correlation, in Encyclopedia of Biostatistics (Wiley, 2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/0470011815.b2a15150
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
About this entry
Cite this entry
Roundy, J.K., Duan, Q., Schaake, J. (2018). Hydrological Predictability, Scales, and Uncertainty Issues. In: Duan, Q., Pappenberger, F., Thielen, J., Wood, A., Cloke, H., Schaake, J. (eds) Handbook of Hydrometeorological Ensemble Forecasting. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40457-3_8-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40457-3_8-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40457-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40457-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences