Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Climate Change Governance: Emerging Legal and Institutional Frameworks for Developing Countries

  • Reference work entry
Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation

Abstract

Climate change is a relatively new governance area in which policy and practice tend to precede theory or advance simultaneously. Establishing effective legal and institutional frameworks is crucial to its management. This chapter conducts a comparative analysis of the climate change governance frameworks of four developing countries, namely, the Philippines, Mexico, South Africa, and Kenya, all of which have enacted or propose climate change legislations, strategies, and related institutional structures and have decentralized governments. These are contrasted with the UK, the first to globally enact a framework climate change law. The results indicate that despite being time- and resource consuming, enactment of stand-alone framework climate change legislation is preferred over piecemeal amendments to relevant laws. Another key finding is the overwhelming adoption of mainstreaming as an important approach to managing climate change. Moreover, both adaptation and mitigation are considered equally important, mitigation being seen as a function of adaptation. This disabuses the notion that developing countries do not or should not focus much on mitigation. Institutionally, establishment of (often) a new high-level cross-sectoral climate change coordinating institution domiciled in the office of and/or chaired by the head of state is common. Such institutions offer general policy guidance and are supported at lower levels by an advisory panel of experts and a technical administrative secretariat. Procedures to ensure clear coordination between the central and devolved governments are in many instances outlined. Climate finance sources and management strategies are mixed. Sharing of experiences and strong support for national climate change legislations under ongoing post-Kyoto negotiations are recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrawal A (2008) The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change. http://www.icarus.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/agrawal-adaptation-institutions-livelihoods.pdf

  • Agrawal A, Perrin N (2009) Climate adaptation, local institutions and rural livelihoods. In: Adger W, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien K (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Balint P, Stewart R, Desai A, Walters L (2011) Wicked environmental problems: managing uncertainty and conflict. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bond P, Sharife K, Allen F, Amisi B, Brunner K, Castel-Branco R, Dorsey D, Gambirazzio G, Hathaway T, Nel A, Nham W (2012) The CDM cannot deliver the money to Africa: why the clean development mechanism won’t save the planet from climate change, and how African civil society is resisting. EJOLT report no 2. http://www.ejolt.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/121221_EJOLT_2_Low.pdf

  • Butler H, Mecey J (1996) Externalities and the matching principle: the case for reallocating environmental regulatory authority. Yale Law Policy Rev 23:23–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevallier R (2010) Integrating adaptation into development strategies: the Southern African perspective. Clim Dev 2:191–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen P (2000) Have we entered the “Anthropocene”? IGBP. http://www.igbp.net/5.d8b4c3c12bf3be638a8000578.html

  • DEFRA (2012) UK climate change risk assessment: government report. The Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Diokno B (2009) Decentralization in the Philippines after ten years – what have we learned? In: Ichimura S, Bahl R (eds) Decentralization policies in Asian development. World Scientific, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel K, Saleska S (2005) Subglobal regulation of the global commons: the case of climate change. Ecol Law Rev 32:183–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen S, Lind J (2009) Adaptation as a political process: adjusting to drought and conflict in Kenya’s drylands. Environ Manage 43:817–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Environment Agency (EEA) (2005) Market-based instruments for environmental policy in Europe. EEA, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Fröhlich J, Knieling J (2013) Conceptualizing climate change governance. In: Knieling J, Filho W (eds) Climate change governance. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano T, Hall L, Gilder A, Parramon M (2011) Governance of climate change in South Africa. South Africa Department of Environmental Affairs, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • GoK (2010a) National climate change response strategy. GoK, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • GoK (2010b) The constitution of Kenya 2010. National Council for Law Reporting, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • GoK (2012) The climate change authority bill 2012. Kenya Gazette supplement no 61 (Bills no 29) 18 June 2012. Government Printer, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • GoK (Government of Kenya) (2013) National climate change action plan 2013–2017. GoK, Nairobi. http://www.kccap.info/

  • Guillotreau P, Campling L, Robinson J (2012) Vulnerability of small island fishery economies to climate and institutional changes. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4:287–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta J, Termeer C, Klostermann J, Meijerink S, van den Brink M, Jong P, Nooteboom S, Bergsma E (2010) The adaptive capacity wheel: a method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environ Sci Policy 13:459–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herodes M, Adelle C, Pallemaerts M (2007) Environmental policy integration and modes of governance – a literature review. Ecologic Institute, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhne N, Moltmann S, Hagemann M, Fekete H, Grözinger J, Schüler V, Vieweg M, Hare B, Schaeffer M, Rocha M (2012) Assessment of Mexico’s policies impacting its greenhouse gas emissions profile. Climate Action Tracker, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Homeyer I (2006) EPIGOV common framework. Ecologic Institute, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme M, Turnpenny J (2004) Understanding and managing climate change: the UK experience. Geogr J 170(2):105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huq S, Rahman A, Konate M, Sokona Y, Reid H (2003) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in least developed countries (LDCs). Russell Press, Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  • IDLO (2012) The new general law of climate change in Mexico: leading national action to transition to a green economy. IDLO, Rome. http://www.idlo.int/Publications/MexicoClimateChangeLWB.pdf

  • IFRC (International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies) (2011) Analysis of legislation related to disaster risk reduction in South Africa. IFRC, Geneva. http://www.ifrc.org/PageFiles/86599/1213900-IDRL_Analysis_South%20Africa-EN-LR.pdf

  • IPCC (2007) IPCC fourth assessment report: climate change 2007. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_and_data_reports.shtml#1

  • Jordan A, Wurzel R, Zito A (2005) The rise of ‘new’ policy instruments in comparative perspective: has governance eclipsed government? Polit Stud 53:477–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kameri-Mbote P, Odote C (2011) Kenya. In: Lord QC, Goldberg S, Rajamani L, Brunnee J (eds) Climate change liability: transnational law and practice. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein R, Eriksen S, Næss L, Hammill A, Tanner T, Robledo C, O’Brien K (2007) Portfolio screening to support the mainstreaming of adaptation to climate change into development assistance. Clim Change 84(1):23–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koelble T, Andrew S (2013) Why decentralization in South Africa has failed. Gov Int J Policy Adm Inst 26(3):343–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankao P (2007) How do local governments in Mexico City manage global warming? Local Environ 12(5):519–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasco R, Pulhin F, Jaranilla-Sanchez P, Delfino R, Gerpacio R, Garcia K (2009) Mainstreaming adaptation in developing countries: the case of the Philippines. Clim Dev 1:130–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus R (2008) Super wicked problems and climate change: restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Rev 94:1153–1243

    Google Scholar 

  • Letete T, Guma M, Marquard A (2009) Information on climate change in South Africa: greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options. http://www.erc.uct.ac.za/Information/Climate%20change/Climate_change_info-complete.pdf

  • Liverman D, O’Brien K (1991) Global warming and climate change in Mexico. Glob Environ Chang 1(5):351–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lofts K, Kenny A (2012) Mainstreaming climate resilience into government: the Philippines Climate Change Act. CDKN Inside Stories, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Manasan R (2009) Local public finance in the Philippines – balancing autonomy and accountability. In: Ichimura S, Bahl R (eds) Decentralization policies in Asian development. World Scientific, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Maponya P, Mpandeli S (2012) Climate change and agricultural production in South Africa: impacts and adaptation options. J Agric Sci 4(10):48–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickwitz P, Aix F, Beck S, Carss D, Ferrand N, Görg C, Jensen A, Kivimaa P, Kuhlicke C, Kuindersma W, Máñez M, Melanen M, Monni S, Pedersen A, Reinert H, van Bommel S (2009) Climate policy integration, coherence and governance. PEER, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulugetta Y (2011) Climate change and carbon trading in Africa. In: Reddy T (ed) Carbon trading in Africa: a critical review. Institute for Security Studies, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutimba S, Wanyoike R (2013) Towards a coherent and cost-effective policy response to climate change in Kenya: country report. Heinrich Boll Stiftung, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutimba S, Mayieko S, Olum P, Wanyama K (2010) Climate change vulnerability and adaptation preparedness in Kenya. Heinrich Boll Stiftung, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • National Environment Management Authority Kenya (NEMA) (2008) Effects of climate change and coping mechanisms in Kenya. NEMA, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Oulu M (2011) Mainstreaming climate adaptation in Kenya. Clim Law 2(3):375–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasquini L, Cowling R, Ziervogel G (2013) Facing the heat: barriers to mainstreaming climate change adaptation in local government in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Habitat Int 40:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M, Uitto J (2001) Small island developing states: natural disaster vulnerability and global change. Environ Hazard 3:49–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson A (2004) Environmental policy integration: an introduction. SEI, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson A, Klein R (2008) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change into official development assistance: integration of long-term climate concerns and short-term development needs. http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/ffu/akumwelt/bc2008/papers/bc2008_71_Person-Klein.pdf

  • Reddy T (2011) Climate change, carbon trading and the purpose of this study. In: Reddy T (ed) Carbon trading in Africa: a critical review. Institute for Security Studies, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid W, Goldemberg J (1998) Developing countries are combating climate change: actions in developing countries that slow growth in carbon emissions. Energy Policy 26(3):233–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Republic of the Philippines (RoP) (2010) National framework strategy on climate change 2010–2022. Climate Change Commission, Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts D (2008) Thinking globally, acting locally: institutionalizing climate change at the local government level in Durban, South Africa. Environ Urban 20(2):521–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez V, Ward P (1994) Disentangling the PRI from the government in Mexico. Mex Stud 10(1):163–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RoP (2009) Philippines Climate Change Act 2009. RoP, Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • RoP (2010) Philippines Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2010. RoP, Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • RoP (2011) National climate change action plan 2011–2028. Climate Change Commission, Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • RSA (2003) Disaster Management Act. 2002. Government gazette no 24252

    Google Scholar 

  • RSA (2005) Introduction: a policy framework for disaster risk management in South Africa. http://www.capetown.gov.za/en/DRM/Documents/SA_National_Disaster_Man_Framework_2005.pdf

  • RSA (2011) National climate change response white paper. RSA, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • RSA (n.d.) A guide to the national planning framework. http://www.thepresidency.gov.za/docs/pcsa/general/npf1.pdf

  • Ruffo J, Vega M (2011) Mexico. In: The international comparative legal guide to environment & climate law: a practical cross-border insight into environment and climate change law. Global Legal Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavins R (1997) Policy instruments for climate change: how can national governments address a global problem? Univ Chic Legal Forum 2:93–329. http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals%26handle=hein.journals/uchclf1997%26div=12%26id=%26page=

  • Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI) (2009) The economics of climate change in Kenya. SEI, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Townshend T, Mathews A (2013) National climate change legislation: the key to more ambitious international agreements. CDKN, London

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Govt. (2006) Climate Change and Sustainable Energy Act 2006. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/19/pdfs/ukpga_20060019_en.pdf

  • UK Govt. (2008) Climate Change Act 2008. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/27/pdfs/ukpga_20080027_en.pdf

  • UNDP-UNEP (2011) Mainstreaming climate change adaptation into development planning: a guide for practitioners. Poverty-Environment Facility, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance E (2012) Mexico passes climate change law. Nature, 20 Apr. http://www.nature.com/news/mexico-passes-climate-change-law-1.10496

  • World Bank (2013) Country and lending groups. http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-classifications/country-and-lending-groups#Low_income

  • Yumul G Jr, Cruz N, Servando N, Dimalanta C (2011) Extreme weather events and related disasters in the Philippines 2004–08: a sign of what climate change will mean? Disasters 35(2):362–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environment, Energy and Climate Change Consultant, Inscape Research and Consulting, P.O. Box 100828, 00101, Nairobi, Kenya

    Martin Oulu

Authors
  1. Martin Oulu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Oulu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Life Sciences, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany

    Walter Leal Filho

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Oulu, M. (2015). Climate Change Governance: Emerging Legal and Institutional Frameworks for Developing Countries. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38670-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation