Skip to main content

Toxicology Report

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Regulatory Toxicology

Abstract

The question of whether or not a substance should be classified as toxic could in certain cases be a question of life or death. Despite or because of this importance, this critical question is surprisingly hard to answer, since many different aspects, which may influence the toxicity of a compound, have to be considered. In addition, scientist or authorities with a differential expert knowledge and years of experience might differently interpret registered compound-related effects. Thus, writing of an unbiased toxicology report might be the best way of evaluating the toxicological significance of a given compound. Such a report should aim at presenting all collected raw data, the way of calculating the statistical significance, an evaluation of the potential health risks associated with the exposure to a defined compound, and the complete related literature. Then, in the best case, such a toxicological report answers the question about a possible toxic effect of a given substance or at least is the basics of further analysis or investigations. Although every toxicological report is unique and requires adjustment to the predefined study design, one has to keep in mind that such a report in some cases represents the base of legislation or in the worst case can make the difference between life and death. In this review, we give an overview of scientific, industrial, and consumer-related toxicological reports; summarize essential knowledge and key changes regarding exposure, poisons, and poisoning; and indicate contents, which are required to evaluate the toxicity of a tested compound.

H. Mückter: deceased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous (2016) Toxicology 2016: market analysis [Website]. Conference Series LLC, Houston. Available from: https://toxicology.global-summit.com/2016/

  • Brodsky SL (2009) Principles and practice of trial consultation. Guilford Press, New York. xii, 226 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Torre M (2019) Data integrity trends in 483s and warning letters: part 1. Govzilla Blog [Internet]. Available from: https://govzilla.com/blog/2019/05/pharma-medical-devices-data-integrity-breaking-down-keywords-and-citation-trends-from-the-fda/

  • FDA (2018) Data integrity and compliance with drug CGMP. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring. 17p

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest A (2014) Jones v Kaney: the removal of expert witness immunity and its potential impact on forensic scientists. Diffusion: the UCLan Journal of Undergraduate Research 7(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hengstler JG, Van der Burg B, Steinberg P, Oesch F (1999) Interspecies differences in cancer susceptibility and toxicity. Drug Metab Rev 31(4):917–970

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ILO (2010) ILO list of occupational diseases. Recommendation 194. International Labour Organisation, Geneva. 8p

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad HA, Christensen MV, Jensen LD, Schlunssen V, Thulstrup AM, Bonde JP (2013) Notification of occupational disease and the risk of work disability: a two-year follow-up study. Scand J Work Environ Health 39(4):411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens T, Brynner R (2001) Dark remedy: the impact of thalidomide and its revival as a vital medicine. Basic Books, New York. 240pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Viant MR, Ebbels TMD, Beger RD, Ekman DR, Epps DJT, Kamp H et al (2019) Use cases, best practice and reporting standards for metabolomics in regulatory toxicology. Nat Commun 10(1):3041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall WJ (2009) Forensic science in court: the role of the expert witness. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester/Hoboken. xi, 164pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Gudermann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Gudermann, T., Breit, A., Boekhoff, I., Duffus, J.H., Bolt, H.M., Mückter, H. (2021). Toxicology Report. In: Reichl, FX., Schwenk, M. (eds) Regulatory Toxicology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36206-4_98-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36206-4_98-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36206-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36206-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics