Abstract
Standards for the protection of human health are important tools used for risk management of chemical substances. They represent the limit value, the maximum level of exposure deemed acceptable or tolerable, under the particular exposure circumstances for which they are set. Usually, there is a formal assessment process by which the standard is set. From a toxicological point of view, limit values reflect a risk characterization for an available data base. Because assessments by individual scientists can differ, limits are usually based on a consensus. Although they must meet a scientific rationale, limit values also have to take into account political considerations, technical feasibility, and economic consequences.
References
Bolt HM, Huici-Montagud A (2008) Strategy of the scientific committee on occupational exposure limits (SCOEL) in the derivation of occupational exposure limits for carcinogens and mutagens. Arch Toxicol 82:61–64
European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (2019) Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Appendix to chapter R.8: guidance for preparing a scientific report for health-based exposure limits at the workplace. August 2019
European Commission (2006) Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing a framework for the protection of soil and amending Directive 2004/35/EC. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2006:0232:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 29 Feb 2020
Health and Safety Executive (HSE) (2020) EH40/2005 Workplace exposure limits (Fourth Edition 2020)
Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC), World Health Organization (WHO) (2010) WHO human health risk assessment toolkit: chemical hazards. (IPCS harmonization project document; no.8)
Joint Task Force ECHA Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) and Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL) (2017a) Scientific aspects and methodologies related to the exposure of chemicals at the workplace; 28 February 2017, Final version
Joint Task Force ECHA Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) and Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL) (2017b) Scientific aspects and methodologies related to the exposure of chemicals at the workplace, TASK 2; 6 December 2017, Final report
National Research Council (NRC) (2009) Science and decisions: advancing risk assessment. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/12209. Accessed 29 Feb 2020
Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL) (2017) Methodology for derivation of occupational exposure limits of chemical agents. The General Decision-Making Framework of the Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL). Adopted 6 December 2017
US EPA (2018) 2018 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-03/documents/dwtable2018.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb 2020
US EPA (2020) National recommended water quality criteria. https://www.epa.gov/wqc/national-recommended-water-quality-criteria-aquatic-life-criteria-table#hhtable. Accessed 19 Feb 2020
World Health Organization (WHO) (2000) Air quality guidelines for Europe, 2nd edn. http://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/abstracts/air-quality-guidelines-for-europe. Accessed 29 Feb 2020
World Health Organization (WHO) (2005) WHO air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide global update 2005. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2006/WHO_SDE_PHE_OEH_06.02_eng.pdf. Accessed 29 Feb 2020
World Health Organization (WHO) (2010) WHO guidelines for indoor air quality: selected pollutants. http://www.euro.who.int/data/assets/pdf_file/0009/128169/e94535.pdf. Accessed 29 Feb 2020
World Health Organization (WHO) (2017) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, fourth edition, incorporating the 1st addendum. https://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/drinking-water-quality-guidelines-4-including-1st-addendum/en/. Accessed 19 Feb 2020
World Health Organization (WHO) (2019) Healthy environments for healthier populations: why do they matter, and what can we do? World Health Organization, Geneva; 2019 (WHO/CED/PHE/DO/19.01). https://www.who.int/phe/publications/HEALTH-ENVIRONMENT_20082019_OD_LinkUpdated_WEB.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 26 Feb 2020
Resources
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) (2020). https://www.acgih.org/tlv-bei-guidelines/policies-procedures-presentations. Accessed 29 Feb 2020
European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA). http://osha.europa.eu/en/topics/ds/oel/members.stm. Accessed 29 Feb 2020
Summaries of EU legislation > Environment http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/environment/index_en.htm. Accessed 29 Feb 2020
UK Health and Safety Executive (UK HSE). http://www.hse.gov.uk/. Accessed 29 Feb 2020
US Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health Administration (US OSHA). http://www.osha.gov/. Accessed 29 Feb 2020
US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). http://www.epa.gov/. Accessed 29 Feb 2020
World Health Organization (WHO). http://www.who.int/en/. Accessed 29 Feb 2020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Wollin, KM., Illing, H.P. (2020). Limit Value Setting in Different Regulatory Areas of Toxicology. In: Reichl, FX., Schwenk, M. (eds) Regulatory Toxicology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36206-4_81-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36206-4_81-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36206-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36206-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences