Skip to main content

European Regional Policy: What Can Be Learned

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 138 Accesses

Abstract

The need for a common regional policy was not considered in the Treaty of Rome, which brought about the European Economic Community (1957). Two main forces supported the important change in the 1980s and launched the EU Regional Policy (ERP): first, the integration of some countries with GDP pc significantly below the EU average and within-country disparities, such as Ireland, Greece, Portugal, and Spain, and, second, the possible impact on regional disparities of the advances toward a more integrated Union. The arguments supporting the decision to implement regional policy on a European scale are reviewed in Sect. 2. The principles and main aspects of the first two pluriannual programs, as well as a balance of their results, are analyzed in Sect. 3. From the very beginning, two key aspects were underlined: the decision to primarily benefit lagging regions and the belief that regional policies should be designed with a long-term focus. Nevertheless, from 2000 onwards, some additional goals have been introduced which are not clearly compatible. The main one has sought to combine the objectives of increasing economic and social cohesion while also addressing the weaknesses of the European economy, in terms of productivity, innovation, and technological change. This has constituted the basis of the last three programs (Sect. 4), and its main consequence has been that the objective of equality has been relegated to a second plane in favor of objectives related to growth efficiency. Section 5, also important, offers an evaluation of the achievements, weaknesses, and perspectives of the ERP. This allows us to extract a number of significant lessons from the European experience. Some final conclusions close the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Abbreviations

CP:

Cohesion policy

CEC:

Commission of the European Community

CSF:

Community support framework

EAGGF:

European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund

EC:

European Community

ECF:

European Cohesion Fund

ERP:

European Regional Policy

ERDF:

European Regional Development Fund

ESF:

European Social Fund

EU:

European Union

EUC:

European Union Commission

NUTS 2:

Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics. Number 2 refers to “regions”; number 1 to “macro-regions”; and number 3 to “counties, provinces, or departments”.

SEA:

Single European Act

TEU:

Treaty of European Union

References

  • Armstrong H, Taylor J (2000) Regional economics and policy, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachtler J, Berkowitz P, et al (eds) (2017) EU cohesion policy, reassessing performance and direction. https://www.routledge.com/EU-Cohesion-Policy-Open-Access-Reassessing-performance-and-direction/Bachtler-Hardy-Muravska/p/book/97811328224643

  • Biehl D (1986) The contribution of infrastructure to the regional development. Final report. European Commission, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1977) Guidelines for community regional policy; 195 final, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Crescenzi R, Glua M (2018) One or many cohesion policies of the EU? On the diverging impacts of cohesion policy across member states. SERC, Discussion paper no 230

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuadrado-Roura JR, Parellada M (2002) Regional convergence in the EU. Facts, prospects and policies. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuadrado-Roura JR, Martin R, Rodríguez-Pose A (2016) The economic crisis in Europe: urban and regional consequences. Camb J Reg Econ Soc 9(1):3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darvas Z et al (2019a) How to improve European Union cohesion policy for the next decade. Bruegel Policy Contributions no 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Demertzis M, Sapir A, Wolff G (2019) Promoting sustainable and inclusive growth and convergence in the EU. Bruegel Policy Contributions no 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RJ, Thirlwall AP (1975) A model of regional growth rate differentials along Kaldorian lines. In: Oxford Economic Papers, 27:201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezcurra R (2019) Regional disparities and within-country inequality in the European Union. Rev Econ Mundial 51:139–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman AO (1958) The strategy of economic development. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor N (1970) The case for regional policies. Scott J Polit Econ 17(3):337–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krieger-Boden C (2019) What direction should EU cohesion policy take? In CES-Ifo Forum, 1/2018, March, vol 19

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99(3):483–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal G (1957) Economic theory and under-developed regions. Gerald Duckworth, London, 168 p

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan R. Cuadrado-Roura .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Cuadrado-Roura, J.R. (2020). European Regional Policy: What Can Be Learned. In: Fischer, M., Nijkamp, P. (eds) Handbook of Regional Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_140-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36203-3_140-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36203-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36203-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics