Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering pp 3287–3295Cite as

Site Response: 1-D Time Domain Analyses

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

  • 212 Accesses

Synonyms

1-D nonlinear seismic site response analysis; 1-D nonlinear site response analysis; One-dimensional (1-D) time domain analysis

Introduction

One-dimensional (1-D) time domain analysis is one of several currently available methods to evaluate the influence of local site conditions on input (i.e., bedrock) ground motions. However, this method is favored by Geotechnical Earthquake Engineers as it takes into account the unique geotechnical characteristic of a given site, including soil nonlinearity and hysteretic behavior and porewater pressure generation and dissipation. It can also be applied for a wide range of shaking intensities, and it is relatively easy to implement in practice as it is coded in commercially available software.

Through back analysis of numerous case histories, the 1-D time domain analysis has been shown to work well when analyzed soil deposits are horizontally layered, there is a significant impedance contrast within the profile, and when material (model)...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   2,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Assimaki D, Steidl J (2007) Inverse analysis of weak and strong motion downhole array data from the Mw 7.0 Sanriku-Minami earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 27:73–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borja RI, Duvernay BG, Lin CH (2002) Ground response in Lotung: total stress analyses and parametric studies. J Geotech GeoEnviron Eng 128(1):54–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough RW, Penzien J (1993) Dynamics of structures, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Darendeli MB (2001) Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobry R, Pierce WG, Dyvik R, Thomas GE, Ladd RS (1985) Pore pressure model for cyclic straining of sand. Research Report, Civil Engineering Department, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, 56 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan JM, Chang C-Y (1970) Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils. J Soil Mech Found Div 96(SM5):1629–1653

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgamal A, Lai T, Yang Z, He L (2001) Dynamic soil properties, seismic downhole arrays and applications in practice. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashash YMA, Park D (2001) Nonlinear one-dimensional seismic ground motion propagation in the Mississippi embayment. Eng Geol (Amst) 62(1–3):185–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashash YMA, Phillips C, Groholski D (2010) Recent advances in non-linear site response analysis. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashash YMA, Groholski DR, Phillips CA, Park D, Musgrove M (2011) DEEPSOIL 4.0, User Manual and Tutorial. 98 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM, Dobry R, Singh RD (1978) Nonlinear behavior of soft clays during cyclic loading. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 104(12):1427–1447

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondner RL, Zelasko JS (1963) A hyperbolic stress–strain formulation of sands. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Pan American conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Sao Paulo, pp 289–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SL (2009) Analysis of Turkey flat ground motion prediction experiment – lessons learned and implications for practice. In: SMIP09 seminar on utilization of strong-motion data, San Francisco, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwok O-LA, Stewart JP, Hashash YMA, Matasovic N, Pyke R, Wang Z, Yang Z (2007) Use of exact solutions of wave propagation problems to guide implementation of nonlinear ground response analysis procedures. ASCE J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 133(11):1385–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin PP, Seed HB (1978) APOLLO, a computer program for the analysis of pore pressure generation and dissipation in horizontal sand layers during cyclic earthquake loading. Report No. EERC 78–21, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin GR, Finn WDL, Seed HB (1975) Fundamentals of liquefaction under cyclic loading. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 101(GT5):423–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Masing G (1926) Eigenspannungen und Verfestigung beim Messing. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international congress on applied mechanics, Zürich, pp 332-335

    Google Scholar 

  • Matasovic N (1993) Seismic response of composite horizontally layered soil deposits. PhD dissertation, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, University of California, Los Angeles, 452 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Matasovic N (2006) D-MOD_2 – a computer program for seismic response analysis of horizontally layered soil deposits, earthfill dams, and solid waste landfills. User’s Manual, GeoMotions, LLC, Lacey, 20 p (plus Appendices)

    Google Scholar 

  • Matasovic N, Hashash YMA (2012) Site response analysis in transportation engineering practice – a TRB Survey. In: Proceedings of the GeoCongress 2012, Oakland, CD-ROM paper, pp 1789–1798

    Google Scholar 

  • Matasovic N, Ordonez GA (2007) D-MOD2000 – a computer program package for seismic response analysis of horizontally layered soil deposits, earthfill dams, and solid waste landfills. User’s Manual, GeoMotions, LLC, Lacey, Washington, 182 p. http://www.geomotions.com

  • Matasovic N, Vucetic M (1992) A pore pressure model for cyclic straining of clay. Soils Found J JSSMFE 32(3):156–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matasovic N, Vucetic M (1993) Cyclic characterization of liquefiable sands. ASCE J Geotech Eng 119(11):1805–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matasovic N, Vucetic M (1995a) Generalized cyclic degradation-pore pressure generation model for clays. ASCE J Geotech Eng 121(1):33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matasovic N, Vucetic M (1995b) Seismic response of soil deposits composed of fully saturated clay and sand layers. In: Kenji Ishihara AA (ed) Proceedings of the IS-Tokyo’95, the first international conference on earthquake geotechnical engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark NM (1959) A method of computation for structural dynamics. J Eng Mech Div 85:67–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Pestana JM (1994) A unified constitutive model for clays and sands. ScD thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips C, Hashash YMA (2009) Damping formulation for nonlinear 1D site response analyses. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 29(7):1143–1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polito CP, Green RA, Lee JH (2008) Pore pressure generation models for sands and silty soils subjected to cyclic loading. J Geotech Geoenviron 134(10):1490–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts DM, Zdravković L (1999) Finite element analysis in geotechnical engineering: theory. Thomas Telford, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke RM (1979) Nonlinear soil models for irregular cyclic loadings. J Geotech Eng Div, ASCE 105(GT6):715–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke RM (2000) TESS: a computer program for nonlinear ground response analyses. TAGA Engineering Systems & Software, Lafayette, http://www.tagasoft.com

  • Ragheb AM (1994) Numerical analysis of seismically induced deformations in saturated granular soil strata. PhD dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramberg W, Osgood WR (1943) Description of stress–strain curves by three parameters. Technical Note 902, National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayleigh JWS, Lindsay RB (1945) The theory of sound. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe KH, Schofield AN (1963) Mechanical behavior of an idealized ‘wet’ clay. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European conference on soil mechanics, vol 1, Wiesbaden, pp 47–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai C-C, Hashash YMA (2007) A novel framework integrating downhole array data and site response analysis to extract dynamic soil behavior. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(3):181–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic M (1986) Pore pressure buildup and liquefaction of level sandy sites during earthquakes. PhD dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, 616 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic M (1990) Normalized behavior of clay under irregular cyclic loading. Can Geotech J 27:29–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZL (1990) Bounding surface hypoplasticity model for granular soils and its applications. PhD dissertation, University of California at Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeghal M, Elgamal AW (1993) Lotung sites: downhole seismic data analysis. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geosyntec Consultants, 16601 Greenview Lane, Huntington Beach, CA, 92649, USA

    Neven Matasovic

Authors
  1. Neven Matasovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neven Matasovic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Computer Science in Civil Engineering, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, University Hannover, Hannover, Germany

    Michael Beer

  2. Department of Civil Engineering & Engineering Mechanics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

    Ioannis A. Kougioumtzoglou

  3. Institute for Risk & Uncertainty and Centre for Engineering Sustainability, Liverpool, UK

    Edoardo Patelli

  4. Institute for Risk & Uncertainty and Centre for Engineering Dynamics, Liverpool, UK

    Siu-Kui Au

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Matasovic, N. (2015). Site Response: 1-D Time Domain Analyses. In: Beer, M., Kougioumtzoglou, I.A., Patelli, E., Au, SK. (eds) Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35344-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation