Skip to main content

Assessment of Existing Structures Using Inelastic Static Analysis

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering
  • 318 Accesses

Synonyms

Nonlinear static analysis; Pushover-based analysis

Introduction

Over the last few decades, it has been found that the traditional procedures, which are based on elastic linear analysis, can only approximately estimate the typically nonlinear seismic response. Therefore, the inelastic methods of analysis have been gradually introduced into practice in order to estimate the seismic response more realistically. Contrary to the elastic linear methods which can only implicitly predict the performance, the objective of the inelastic seismic analysis procedures is to directly estimate the magnitude of inelastic deformations.

In general, the most refined and accurate inelastic method is the nonlinear response history analysis (NRHA). Nevertheless, it is only sporadically used in the design practice, since it is, for the time being, still too complex for regular use. It requires substantial experience and knowledge about the modeling of the dynamic response of structures and seismic...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 2,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ATC 40, ATC (1996) Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, ATC-40 report, funded by the Seismic Safety Commission, published by the Applied Technology Council. Redwood City, California

    Google Scholar 

  • AydinoÄŸlu NM (2003) An incremental response spectrum analysis procedure based on inelastic spectral displacements for multi-mode seismic performance evaluation. Bull Earthq Eng 1:3–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt CAAF (2011) Seismic assessment of existing buildings using nonlinear static procedures (NSPs) –a new 3D pushover procedure, PhD thesis. Technical University of Lisbon, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracci JM, Kunnath SK, Reinhorn AM (1997) Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation of reinforced concrete structures. J Struct Eng 123(1):3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CEB FIP (2003) Displacement–based seismic design of reinforced concrete buildings; state-of-the-art-report, fib Bulletin No 25, Laussane, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2004) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance – part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • CEN (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3: strengthening and repair of buildings, EN 1998–3. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra AK, Goel RK (2002) A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 31:561–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra AK, Goel RK, Chintanapakdee C (2004) Evaluation of a modified MPA procedure assuming higher modes as elastic to estimate seismic demands. Earthq Spectra 20(3):757–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard MO, Sozen MA (1993) Behavior-based method to determine design shear in earthquake-resistant walls. J Struct Div Am Soc Civil Eng N Y 119(2):619–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P (1999) Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28(9):979–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fajfar P, Fischinger M (1988) N2 – a method for non-linear seismic analysis of regular structures. In: Proceedings of the ninth world conference on earthquake engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA 356, ASCE (2000) Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA 356 report, prepared by the American Society of Civil Engineers for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA 440, ATC, FEMA (2005) FEMA-440, improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures, applied technology council for department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischinger M, Rejec K, Isakovic T (2012) Modelling Inelastic shear response of RC walls. In: Proceedings of 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Sept 2012, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman A, Nicoletti JP, Tyrell JV (1975) Evaluations of existing buildings for seismic risk – a case study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington, DC. In: Proceedings of the 1st U.S. national conference earthquake engineering, EERI, Berkeley, pp 113–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappos AJ, Saiidi MS, AydinoÄŸlu MN, Isakovic T (2012) Seismic design and assessment of bridges: inelastic methods of analysis and case studies. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krawinkler H, Seneviratna GDPK (1998) Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation. Eng Struct 20(4–6):452–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreslin M, Fajfar P (2012) The extended N2 method considering higher mode effects in both plan and elevation. Bull Earthq Eng 10(2):695–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mergos PE, Kappos AJ (2008) A distributed shear and flexural flexibility model with shear-flexure interaction for R/C members subjected to seismic loading. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 37(12):1349–1370. doi:10.1002/eqe.812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NZS 1170.5 (2004) Structural design actions, part 5: earthquake actions – New Zealand. Standards New Zealand, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • NZSEE (2006) Assessment and improvement of the structural performance of buildings in earthquake. New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Wellington

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekcan G, Mander JB, Chen SS (1999) Fundamental considerations for the design of non-linear viscous dampers. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28:1405–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN (1995) Displacement-based seismic assessment of existing reinforced concrete buildings. Proc Pac Conf Earthq Eng 2:225–244. Melbourne

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Priestley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalsky MJ (2007) Displacement-based seismic design of structures. IUSS Press, Pavia

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejec K, Isakovic T, Fischinger M (2012) Seismic shear force magnification in RC cantilever structural walls, designed according to Eurocode 8. Bull Earthq Eng 10(2):567–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiidi M, Sozen M (1981) Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of R/C structures. J Struct Div ASCE 107(ST5):937–952

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatjana Isakovic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Isakovic, T. (2015). Assessment of Existing Structures Using Inelastic Static Analysis. In: Beer, M., Kougioumtzoglou, I.A., Patelli, E., Au, SK. (eds) Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35344-4_201

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics