Skip to main content

Sub-Total and Total Vertebrectomy for Tumours

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
European Surgical Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Abstract

En bloc resections in the spine involve sub-total and total vertebral body excision depending on the location of the tumour. The goal of these procedures is to obtain tumour-free margins and conform surgical planning to the oncological indications proposed by Enneking and validated later in the treatment of primary tumours. The spine imposes significant anatomical constraints which make wide margins more difficult to achieve when compared to extremity surgery.

There are three techniques one can use:

  • The first is a combination of anterior and posterior approaches to perform the en bloc resection of the vertebral body/ies In selected cases -when the tumour is not expanding anteriorly- this procedure can be performed by posterior-only approach.

  • The second is an anterior and posterior approach (or posterior approach alone if feasible) to perform a sagittal resection of the vertebrae.

  • The third is the resection of posterior elements by posterior approach alone. All three are technically challenging and complications should be anticipated.

The Weinstein, Boriani, Biagini staging system can be used to help assess spine tumours as well as to plan the resection.

The epidural extension of a tumour may prevent the obtaining of negative margins. A very morbid choice like dura resection and inclusion in the specimen can be considered and weighed against the risks.

The risks of surgery must always be balanced against the risks of avoiding surgery. When non-oncologically appropriate treatment is performed most of these patients will experience local recurrences and undergo further surgery and possibly die of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Talac R, Yaszemski MJ, Currier BL, et al. Relationship between surgical margins and local recurrence in sarcomas of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;397:127–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fujita T, Kawahara N, Matsumoto T, Tomita K. Chordoma in the cervical spine managed with en bloc excision. Spine. 1999;24(17):1848–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rhines LD, Fourney DR, Siadati A, Suk I, Gokaslan ZL. En bloc resection of multilevel cervical chordoma with C-2 involvement. Case report and description of operative technique. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2(2):199–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bailey CS, Fisher CG, Boyd MC, Dvorak MF. En bloc marginal excision of a multilevel cervical chordoma. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4(5):409–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Currier BL, Papagelopoulos PJ, Krauss WE, Unni KK, Yaszemski MJ. Total en bloc spondylectomy of C5 vertebra for chordoma. Spine. 2007;32(9):E294–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leitner Y, Shabat S, Boriani L, Boriani S. En bloc resection of a C4 chordoma: surgical technique. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(12):2238–42.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Biagini R, Casadei R, Boriani S, et al. En bloc vertebrectomy and dural resection for chordoma: a case report. Spine. 2003;28(18):E368–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Keynan O, Fisher CG, Boyd MC, O'Connell JX, Dvorak MF. Ligation and partial excision of the cauda equina as part of a wide resection of vertebral osteosarcoma: a case report and description of surgical technique. Spine. 2005;30(4):E97–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. American Cancer Society. Facts and figures 2008. http://www.americancancersociety.org. Accessed 2008.

  10. Dahlin DC, Unni KK. In Bone tumors. General aspects and data on 8,542 cases. 4th ed. Springfield: Charles C Thomas; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Campanacci M. Bone and soft tissue tumors. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Woodard JS, Freeman LW. Ischemia of the spinal cord; an experimental study. J Neurosurg. 1956;13(1):63–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fujimaki Y, Kawahara N, Tomita K, Murakami H, Ueda Y. How many ligations of bilateral segmental arteries cause ischemic spinal cord dysfunction? An experimental study using a dog model. Spine. 2006;31(21):E781–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kato S, Kawahara N, Tomita K, Murakami H, Demura S, Fujimaki Y. Effects on spinal cord blood flow and neurologic function secondary to interruption of bilateral segmental arteries which supply the artery of Adamkiewicz: an experimental study using a dog model. Spine. 2008;33(14):1533–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawahara N, Tomita K, Murakami H, Demura S. Total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal tumors: surgical techniques and related basic background. Orthopedic Clin N Am. 2009;40(1):47–63, vi.

    Google Scholar 

  16. O'Sullivan B, Davis AM, Turcotte R, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma of the limbs: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9325):2235–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang J, Frassica FJ, Fayad L, Clark DP, Weber KL. Analysis of nondiagnostic results after image-guided needle biopsies of musculoskeletal lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(11):3103–11.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roy Camille R, Mazel CH, Saillant G, Lapresle Ph. Treatment of malignant tumours of the spine with posterior instrumentation. In: Sundaresan N, Schmidek HH, Schiller AL, Rosenthal DI, editors. Tumours of the spine. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stener B, Johnsen OE. Complete removal of three vertebrae for giant-cell tumour. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1971;53(2):278–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Baba H, Tsuchiya H, Fujita T, Toribatake Y. Total en bloc spondylectomy. A new surgical technique for primary malignant vertebral tumors. Spine. 1997;22(3):324–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Boriani S, Bandiera S, Donthineni R, et al. Morbidity of en bloc resections in the spine. Eur Spine J;19(2):231–41.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are deeply indebted to Prof. M. Campanacci, who spent a long time teaching us how to understand the biological behaviour of bone tumours and how to establish the treatment strategy on the complete analysis of each single case. To his memory this work is dedicated.

A special thank to Carlo Piovani for his assistance in preparing the preliminary drawings and for the daily work of imaging elaboration and archive.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Boriani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 EFORT

About this entry

Cite this entry

Boriani, S., Schwab, J., Bandiera, S., Colangeli, S., Ghermandi, R., Gasbarrini, A. (2014). Sub-Total and Total Vertebrectomy for Tumours. In: Bentley, G. (eds) European Surgical Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34746-7_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34746-7_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34745-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34746-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics