Skip to main content

Hypothetical Legal Questions and the Psychiatric Expert

  • Reference work entry
Legal and Forensic Medicine

Abstract

The verbal interactions between the psychiatric expert and the other participants in court cases often center round hypothetical questions. This type of question aims:

  • To challenge the position presented by the psychiatrist in his/her medicolegal report or his/her verbal deposition

  • To clarify for the judge/s (the decision makers) the expert witness’ concepts and conclusions as they appear in his/her medicolegal report and verbal depositions

The intention of this chapter is to foster the understanding of the meaning and uses of hypothetical questions in court and in this way to assist the psychiatrist expert to react in rationally and effectively when confronted with this type of questions.

To facilitate the comprehension of the chapter, clinical examples and pertinent quotations from relevant literature are analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. John H. Wigmore. A treatise on the Anglo-American system of evidence in trials at common law, Sec. 686. 2nd ed. Boston: Little Brown & Co.; 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lehman. West’s encyclopedia of American law. 2nd ed. Thomson Gale; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bryan A. Garner. Black’s law dictionary. 9th ed. West; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Appelbaum PS, Gutheil TG. Clinical handbook of psychiatry and the law. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harney DM. Medical malpractice. 3rd ed. Charlottesville: The Michie Company; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Candilis PJ, Weinstock R, Martinez R. Forensic ethics and the expert witness. New York: Springer; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutheil TG, Simon RI. Mastering forensic psychiatric practice: advances strategies for the expert witness. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Mester M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Mester, R., Asman, O. (2013). Hypothetical Legal Questions and the Psychiatric Expert. In: Beran, R. (eds) Legal and Forensic Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_99

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics