Skip to main content

Informed Consent in Saudi Arabia

  • Reference work entry
Legal and Forensic Medicine

Abstract

This chapter reviews the Saudi version of applying the guidelines of informed consent. Informed consent is defined as “…an autonomous act by a patient or research subject to expressly permit a professional person to perform a medical action on the patient or to include a person in a research project…” ([7]). The main argument is whether the informed consent, as it advocated in the western cultural, is suitable for Saudi patients. To provide a better understanding, it is important to know a few things about the cultural context as it contributes to the discrepancies between the western secular notions of informed consent and the Saudi religious one. The governances in its written form do not differ significantly from the western ones. The application of the enforced written material is not the same. The Saudi personality poses a challenge to the individualistic autonomous notion that introduced the informed consent concept.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MOH. Ministry of Health, Statistics book. 2009 [10/08/2012]. Available from: http://www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/Statistics/Book/Pages/default.aspx.

  2. NGHA. National Guard Health Affair 2011 [10/08/2012]. Available from: http://www.ngha.med.sa/English/Pages/default.aspx.

  3. Abolfotouh MA, Adlan AA. Quality of informed consent for invasive procedures in central Saudi Arabia. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:269.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fageeh W, Raffa H, Jabbad H, Marzouki A. Transplantation of the human uterus. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;76(3):245–51. Epub 2002/03/07.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kandela P. Uterine transplantation failure causes Saudi Arabian government clampdown. Lancet. 2000;356(9232):838. Epub 2000/10/07.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Serour GI. Islamic perspectives in human reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(Suppl. 3):34–8. Epub 2008/11/15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jamjoom BA, Jamjoom AAB, Sharab M, Jamjoom AB. Attitudes towards informed consent: a comparison between surgeons working in Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom. Oman Med J. 2011;26(1):29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Qadire M, Hammami M, Abdulhameed H, Al Gaai E. Saudi views on consenting for research on medical records and leftover tissue samples. BMC Med Ethics. 2010;11(1):18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdallah A. Adlan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Adlan, A.A. (2013). Informed Consent in Saudi Arabia. In: Beran, R. (eds) Legal and Forensic Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_153

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics