Abstract
This chapter reviews the Saudi version of applying the guidelines of informed consent. Informed consent is defined as “…an autonomous act by a patient or research subject to expressly permit a professional person to perform a medical action on the patient or to include a person in a research project…” ([7]). The main argument is whether the informed consent, as it advocated in the western cultural, is suitable for Saudi patients. To provide a better understanding, it is important to know a few things about the cultural context as it contributes to the discrepancies between the western secular notions of informed consent and the Saudi religious one. The governances in its written form do not differ significantly from the western ones. The application of the enforced written material is not the same. The Saudi personality poses a challenge to the individualistic autonomous notion that introduced the informed consent concept.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
MOH. Ministry of Health, Statistics book. 2009 [10/08/2012]. Available from: http://www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/Statistics/Book/Pages/default.aspx.
NGHA. National Guard Health Affair 2011 [10/08/2012]. Available from: http://www.ngha.med.sa/English/Pages/default.aspx.
Abolfotouh MA, Adlan AA. Quality of informed consent for invasive procedures in central Saudi Arabia. Int J Gen Med. 2012;5:269.
Fageeh W, Raffa H, Jabbad H, Marzouki A. Transplantation of the human uterus. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;76(3):245–51. Epub 2002/03/07.
Kandela P. Uterine transplantation failure causes Saudi Arabian government clampdown. Lancet. 2000;356(9232):838. Epub 2000/10/07.
Serour GI. Islamic perspectives in human reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17(Suppl. 3):34–8. Epub 2008/11/15.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.
Jamjoom BA, Jamjoom AAB, Sharab M, Jamjoom AB. Attitudes towards informed consent: a comparison between surgeons working in Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom. Oman Med J. 2011;26(1):29.
Al-Qadire M, Hammami M, Abdulhameed H, Al Gaai E. Saudi views on consenting for research on medical records and leftover tissue samples. BMC Med Ethics. 2010;11(1):18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Adlan, A.A. (2013). Informed Consent in Saudi Arabia. In: Beran, R. (eds) Legal and Forensic Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_153
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_153
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32337-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32338-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences