Skip to main content

Surrogacy Under French Law: Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues

  • Reference work entry
Legal and Forensic Medicine

Abstract

Surrogacy is the situation when a woman, known as the surrogate mother, carries and delivers a baby for a person or couple, known as the commissioning parent(s). For the commissioning parent(s), the main reason to have access to this practice is generally because they are unable to conceive and bear their own child due to medical reasons. Regarding the surrogate mother, her decision can be grouped together under the headings of wishing to enable parenthood, to feel self-actualized, to enhance her identity, or to be driven by a feeling of empathy or financial gains. No matter the reasons for both parties, surrogacy raises a lot of public concerns. In France, surrogacy has been against the law since 1994. Its prohibition is justified by two principles of public policy. On the one hand, there is the principle of inviolability of the human body which means that no part of it can be treated like a property. On the second hand, there is the principle of nonavailability of people’s status which implies that the intended parents and the surrogate mother cannot, by their single individual decision, choose the status of the unborn child. Next to these two principles lie medical, ethical, and legal issues.

This chapter analyzes French law regarding surrogacy and surrogacy’s consequences examining the medical, ethical, and legal aspects.

My special thanks goes to Renaud LUNARDO, a former colleague, for his invaluable support and kindness from September to December 2011.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Henrion R, Bergoignan E. Rapport au nom d’un groupe de travail – la gestation pour autrui, National Academy of Medicine. 2009, http://www.académie-médecine.fr/detailPublication.cfm?idRub=26&idLigne=1545. Accessed Dec 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lacayo R. Whose child is this ? Time. 1987;129:56–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schreiber H. The legal situation regarding assisted reproduction in Germany. Reprod BioMed Online. 2002;6:8–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brahams D. The hasty British ban on commercial surrogacy. Hastings Cent Rep. 1987;17(1):16–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Siegel-Itzkovich J. Israel legalizes surrogate motherhood. BMJ. 1996;312:729–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aarons J. Future choices: assisted reproductive technologies and the law, Center for American Progress; 2007. http://www.americanprogress.org. Accessed Dec 2011.

  7. Associated Press. India’s surrogate mother business raises questions of global ethics, 12th December; 2007. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/india-surrogate-mother-business-raises-questions-global-ethics-article-1.276982. Accessed Dec 2011.

  8. Lacub M. L’empire du ventre. Pour une autre histoire de la maternité. Paris: Fayard; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Recueil Dalloz; 1991. p. 417.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Field M. Surrogate motherhood. Harvard University Press; 1988, p. 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lasker J, Susan Borg S. In search of parenthood: coping with infertility and high tech conception. Boston: Boston Press; New York Post (1981) surrogates comfort one another, September 8th; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kane E. Birth mother: America’s first legal surrogate mother, her change of heart. New York: Harcourt, Brace; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mahler H. The safe motherhood initiative: a call to action. The Lancet, 21st March, speech given at the International ‘Safe Motherhood’ Conference, Nairobi, 10–13 Feb 1987, p. 668; 1987, Cawthon E., Medicine on trial, ABC-CLIO, ebook, pp. 151–152.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kubiak SA. Les aspects juridiques de la gestation pour autrui en droit compare: pologne. France et Grande-Bretagne: Universitaires Européennes; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bioethics act no. 94–654 of 29th July, O.J. 30th July 1994; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bioethics act no. 2004–800 of 6th August, O.J. 7th August 2004; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bioethics act no. 2011–814 of 7th July, O.J. 8th July 2004; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Family Law Report. 13(US), Baby M, 22, 2001; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Delaisi de Parseval G. To FIV or not to FIV : will gestational surrogacy be an indication for Assisted Reproductive Techniques. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertility. 2006; 34; pp. 720–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Montgolfier S. Maternité pour autrui: du désir d’enfant à l’enfant à tout prix. Médecine Sciences: M/S. 2009;25(4):419–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mc GG. Trials and tribulations of surrogacy: legislation gestation. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(3):407–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menesson S. & D. La gestation pour autrui – l’improbable débat, Michalon; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allane Madanamoothoo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Madanamoothoo, A. (2013). Surrogacy Under French Law: Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues. In: Beran, R. (eds) Legal and Forensic Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_102

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics