Abstract
Surrogacy is the situation when a woman, known as the surrogate mother, carries and delivers a baby for a person or couple, known as the commissioning parent(s). For the commissioning parent(s), the main reason to have access to this practice is generally because they are unable to conceive and bear their own child due to medical reasons. Regarding the surrogate mother, her decision can be grouped together under the headings of wishing to enable parenthood, to feel self-actualized, to enhance her identity, or to be driven by a feeling of empathy or financial gains. No matter the reasons for both parties, surrogacy raises a lot of public concerns. In France, surrogacy has been against the law since 1994. Its prohibition is justified by two principles of public policy. On the one hand, there is the principle of inviolability of the human body which means that no part of it can be treated like a property. On the second hand, there is the principle of nonavailability of people’s status which implies that the intended parents and the surrogate mother cannot, by their single individual decision, choose the status of the unborn child. Next to these two principles lie medical, ethical, and legal issues.
This chapter analyzes French law regarding surrogacy and surrogacy’s consequences examining the medical, ethical, and legal aspects.
My special thanks goes to Renaud LUNARDO, a former colleague, for his invaluable support and kindness from September to December 2011.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Henrion R, Bergoignan E. Rapport au nom d’un groupe de travail – la gestation pour autrui, National Academy of Medicine. 2009, http://www.académie-médecine.fr/detailPublication.cfm?idRub=26&idLigne=1545. Accessed Dec 2011.
Lacayo R. Whose child is this ? Time. 1987;129:56–8.
Schreiber H. The legal situation regarding assisted reproduction in Germany. Reprod BioMed Online. 2002;6:8–12.
Brahams D. The hasty British ban on commercial surrogacy. Hastings Cent Rep. 1987;17(1):16–9.
Siegel-Itzkovich J. Israel legalizes surrogate motherhood. BMJ. 1996;312:729–30.
Aarons J. Future choices: assisted reproductive technologies and the law, Center for American Progress; 2007. http://www.americanprogress.org. Accessed Dec 2011.
Associated Press. India’s surrogate mother business raises questions of global ethics, 12th December; 2007. http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/india-surrogate-mother-business-raises-questions-global-ethics-article-1.276982. Accessed Dec 2011.
Lacub M. L’empire du ventre. Pour une autre histoire de la maternité. Paris: Fayard; 2004.
Recueil Dalloz; 1991. p. 417.
Field M. Surrogate motherhood. Harvard University Press; 1988, p. 3–4.
Lasker J, Susan Borg S. In search of parenthood: coping with infertility and high tech conception. Boston: Boston Press; New York Post (1981) surrogates comfort one another, September 8th; 1988.
Kane E. Birth mother: America’s first legal surrogate mother, her change of heart. New York: Harcourt, Brace; 1988.
Mahler H. The safe motherhood initiative: a call to action. The Lancet, 21st March, speech given at the International ‘Safe Motherhood’ Conference, Nairobi, 10–13 Feb 1987, p. 668; 1987, Cawthon E., Medicine on trial, ABC-CLIO, ebook, pp. 151–152.
Kubiak SA. Les aspects juridiques de la gestation pour autrui en droit compare: pologne. France et Grande-Bretagne: Universitaires Européennes; 2011.
Bioethics act no. 94–654 of 29th July, O.J. 30th July 1994; 1994.
Bioethics act no. 2004–800 of 6th August, O.J. 7th August 2004; 2004.
Bioethics act no. 2011–814 of 7th July, O.J. 8th July 2004; 2011.
Family Law Report. 13(US), Baby M, 22, 2001; 1987.
Further Reading
Delaisi de Parseval G. To FIV or not to FIV : will gestational surrogacy be an indication for Assisted Reproductive Techniques. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertility. 2006; 34; pp. 720–726.
De Montgolfier S. Maternité pour autrui: du désir d’enfant à l’enfant à tout prix. Médecine Sciences: M/S. 2009;25(4):419–22.
Mc GG. Trials and tribulations of surrogacy: legislation gestation. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(3):407–11.
Menesson S. & D. La gestation pour autrui – l’improbable débat, Michalon; 2010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Madanamoothoo, A. (2013). Surrogacy Under French Law: Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues. In: Beran, R. (eds) Legal and Forensic Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_102
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32338-6_102
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32337-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32338-6
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences