Spiritual struggles can thus appear both within context and decidedly outside a religious institution such as the church.
“(…) people call themselves religious and spiritual, religious but not spiritual, spiritual but not religious, neither spiritual nor religious, and, very interestingly, a hair-splitting blend of religious spirituality plus nonreligion (e.g., […] ‘I am a spiritual Christian but not religious’).” (Paloutzian and Park 2005, 16)
State of Research
Religious and spiritual conflicts had long been neglected by psychology (Exline and Rose 2005). An expanding research interest in so-called religious/spiritual struggles is however apparent, especially in the USA. Such struggles are generally described as “expressions of conflict, question and doubt regarding matters of faith, God and religious relationships” (McConnell et al. 2006). Yet, there is a lack of coherence in the perceived meaning of religious and/or spiritual conflicts. Definitions rely on authors’ respective understandings of religion and spirituality and their conceptualization and operationalization of the constructs. One has to consider that the term “spirituality,” which accounts for existential needs that do not have to be religious in nature, is itself religious, i.e., “Christian origin” (Körtner 2006), with the spirit of God already referred to as “spiritus” in the Vulgate. This use of an explicitly Christian, and thus religious, term to signify something that is distinct from religion, particularly from Christianity, shows the complexity of the constructs used and the difficulty of defining them. It also shows the heavily criticized Christian bias in research on the psychology of religion (Morgenthaler and Noth 2011).
“Is God to Blame?: The Challenge of Suffering”
“Perceived Attacks from the Spiritual Realm: The Challenge of Supernatural Evil”
“Sin and Self-forgiveness: The Challenge of Cultivating Virtue”
“Challenges of Religious Community”
An increased awareness of overtly theological and religious terms becomes apparent in the second publication. It was also stated for the first time that the research reflected “a clear monotheism bias” (ibid., 388). Furthermore, the scholarly questioning was progressively opened up to theology.
To make major strides in our knowledge about specific struggles, psychologists will benefit by learning from – and collaborating with – professionals who specialize in religious and spiritual issues, such as theologians, clergy, pastoral counselors, chaplains, and spiritual directors. (ibid., 392f.)
In 2014, “The Religious and Spiritual Struggles Scale” (RSS) was published by Exline, Grubbs, Pargament, and Yali. In this paper, spirituality was defined as a “search for the sacred” and for “elements of life that are seen as manifestations of the divine, transcendent or ultimate, either inside or outside a specific religious context” (Exline et al. 2014). Religion, on the other hand, was defined as taking place “in the larger context of established spirituality and structures that aim to facilitate spirituality” (ibid.). The authors stated that for a long time religiosity and spirituality had only been researched as potential resources, overlooking the fact that they can also be a source of conflict and difficulty affecting mental health and well-being. Exline et al. (2014) called for methods of measurement with which the various facets of religious/spiritual conflicts can be determined. They presented an attempt to develop a new method of assessing religious/spiritual conflicts on the basis of a self-report procedure, with the following six subscales: (1) “divine struggle,” (2) “demonic struggle,” (3) “interpersonal struggle,” (4) “moral struggle,” (5) “doubt-related struggle,” and (6) “struggle around ultimate meaning” (ibid., 209). The development of the 26-item RSS was built on previous attempts to empirically assess religious/spiritual conflicts, particularly with the “Brief RCOPE” (Pargament et al. 1998), which had proven to be the most widely used method so far. However, five of the seven items in the Brief RCOPE focus on “divine struggles” and do not consider the broader range of possible conflicts. The aim of developing the new RSS scale was to empirically assess “supernatural, interpersonal, and intrapersonal struggles” (ibid., 209). To this end, it had to meet several requirements: The “self-report measure” should focus on recording the subjective experience of conflicts. Thus, it should be possible to better distinguish between different conflicts and attempts to overcome them, i.e., between “struggles” and “coping.” Furthermore, the measuring instrument should be flexible and be able to cover both single events and certain time periods. It should accommodate both religious/spiritual individuals and those not identifying as such. The instrument should linguistically be formulated so that it does not give preference to a single theistic tradition. Thus, words such as church, sin, etc. should be avoided to prevent the bias of a Christian perspective in the research.
Reliability and validity of the 26-item RSS were confirmed by two studies, the model with six subscales achieving a very good fit via confirmatory factor analysis (ibid., 219). The scale has contributed to the empirical investigation of inner religious and spiritual conflicts. The RSS has since additionally been validated with Jewish and Muslim samples in Israel (Abu-Raiya et al. 2015a, 2016b). The measurement of religious and spiritual struggles has also gained interest in research regarding, e.g., suicide risk and spiritual transformation in veterans (Raines et al. 2017; Wilt et al. 2018), and atheists appear to experience some of these struggles as well (Sedlar et al. 2018), as they display similar levels of interpersonal and ultimate-meaning-related struggles. Exline et al. (2017b) for the first time also documented divine struggle in the form of anger toward god(s) in a polytheistic sample among undergraduates in India. Interest and research in this topic are swiftly expanding. Furthermore, the link between religious/spiritual struggles and many factors, such as well-being/happiness, psychological distress/depression, stressful life events, life satisfaction, religious commitment, religious support, religious hope, and personal growth, has been explored (Abu-Raiya et al. 2015, 2016; Stauner et al. 2016, 2018; Exline et al. 2017). In a Polish sample, a positive correlation between the RSS and anxiety and a negative correlation with satisfaction with life were also found (Zarzycka and Zietek 2018). Satisfaction with life increased with the propensity to find meaning in religious doubt. Clearly, many facets relating to religious and spiritual struggles are relevant, and many individuals may benefit from a deeper understanding of them. The growth of interest in research on the subject and its many intertwined dimensions is evident, as is the need to further disentangle and elucidate them.
- Exline, J. J., & Rose, E. (2005). Religious and spiritual struggles. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 315–330). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Exline, J. J., & Rose, E. D. (2013). Religious and spiritual struggles. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 380–398). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Exline, J. J., Hall, T. W., Pargament, K. I., & Harriott, V. A. (2017a). Predictors of growth from spiritual struggle among Christian undergraduates: Religious coping and perceptions of helpful action by God are both important. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(5), 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Körtner, U. H. J. (2006). Wiederkehr der Religion? Das Christentum zwischen neuer Spiritualität und Gottvergessenheit. Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus.Google Scholar
- Morgenthaler, C., & Noth, I. (2011). Eine kulturell sensible Religionspsychologie und klinische Beratungspsychologie – Wunsch oder Wirklichkeit? In I. Noth, C. Morgenthaler, & K. J. Greider (Eds.), Pastoral psychology and psychology of religion in dialogue (pp. 136–154). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
- Paloutzian, R. F., & Park, C. L. (2005). Integrative themes in the current science of the psychology of religion. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 3–21). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Pargament, K. I., Exline, J. J., & Jones, J. W. (Eds.). (2013). APA handbook of psychology, religion, and spirituality (Vol. 1): Context, theory, and research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Stauner, N., Exline, J. J., & Pargament, K. I. (2016). Religious and spiritual struggles as concerns for health and well-being. HORIZONTE-Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciências da Religião, 14(41), 48–75. https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2175-5841.2016v14n41p48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stauner, N., Exline, J. J., Pargament, K. I., Wilt, J. A., & Grubbs, J. B. (2018). Stressful life events and religiousness predict struggles about religion and spirituality. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rel0000189.
- Wilt, J. A., Pargament, K. I., Exline, J. J., Barrera, T. L., & Teng, E. J. (2018). Spiritual transformation among veterans in response to a religious/spiritual struggle. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality (pp. 1–12). Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rel0000208.
- Zarzycka, B., & Zietek, P. (2018). Spiritual growth or decline and meaning-making as mediators of anxiety and satisfaction with life during religious struggle. Journal of Religion and Health, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0598-y.