Cohesion in a social context can be defined in various ways depending on the scientific background of the researcher. Social cohesion has inspired many scholars from the beginning of many fields, mainly social psychology and sociology. Today, both fields suggest that cohesion does not just describe the social bonding of members of specific groups, community segments, or societies, but an array of more complicated structural, psychological, and biological processes.
Throughout history, religion has played both the role of a stimulus of cohesiveness and that of a power of deviance. We can study cohesion in different levels of analysis, such as the micro (group), the meso (community), and the macro (society). In order to understand the relational interactions of religion and cohesion, we should take into consideration all possible levels of analysis due to religion’s multivariable visibility and forms of expression.
This chapter aspires to examine how cohesion works in religious groups...
Bibliography
Alam, Y., & Husband, C. (2013). Islamophobia, community cohesion and counter-terrorism policies in Britain. Patterns of Prejudice, 47(3), 235–252.
Beal, D. J., Cohen, R., Burke, M. J., & McLendon, C. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989–1004.
Bollen, K. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69(2), 479–504.
Bruhn, J. (2013). The group effect: Social cohesion and health outcomes. London: Springer.
Durkheim, É. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life (trans: Fields, K. E.). New York: The Free Press.
Durkheim, É. (1997). The division of labor in society (trans: Halls, W. D.). New York: The Free Press.
Hervieu-Léger, D. (2006). The role of religion in establishing social cohesion. In K. Michalski (Ed.), Religion in the new Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.
Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness. New York: New York University Press.
Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1965). Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 64(4), 259–309.
Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. W. (1969). Social psychology. New York: Harper & Row.
Swann, W. B., Jr., Gómez, A., Seyle, C., & Morales, F. (2009). Identity fusion: The interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 995–1011.
Swann, W. B., Jensen, J., Gómez, A., Whitehouse, H., & Bastian, B. (2012). When group membership gets personal: A theory of identity fusion. Psychological Review, 119(3), 441–456.
Whitehouse, H. (2013). Religion, cohesion and hostility. In S. Clarke, R. Powell, & J. Savulescu (Eds.), Religion, intolerance, and conflict: A scientific and conceptual investigation (pp. 36–47). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whitehouse, H., & Lanman, J. A. (2014). The ties that bind us: Ritual, fusion, and identification. Current Anthropology, 55(6), 674–695.
Xygalatas, D., Mitkidis, P., Fischer, R., Reddish, P., Skewes, J., Geertz, A. W., Roepstorff, A., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). Extreme rituals promote prosociality. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1602–1605.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
About this entry
Cite this entry
Orfanidis, C. (2018). Cohesion. In: Leeming, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27771-9_200160-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27771-9_200160-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27771-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27771-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences