Skip to main content

Limited and Censored Dependent Variable Models

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Regional Science

Abstract

In regional science, many attributes, either social or natural, can be categorical. For example, choices of travel mode, presidential election outcomes, or quality of life can all be measured (and/or coded) as discrete responses, dependent on various influential factors. Some attributes, although continuous, are subject to truncation or censoring. For example, household income, when reported, tends to be censored, and only boundary values of a range are obtained. Such categorical and censored variables can be analyzed using econometric models that are established based on the concept of “unobserved/latent dependent variable.” The previous examples also share another common feature: when data is collected in a spatial setting, they are all inevitably influenced by spatial effects, either spatial variation or spatial interaction. In contrast to panel data or time-series data, such variation or dependencies are two-dimensional, making it even more complicated. The need for investigating such limited and censored variables in a spatial context compels the quest for rigorous statistical methods.

This chapter introduces existing methods that are developed to analyze limited and censored dependent variables while considering the spatial effects. Different model specifications are discussed, with an emphasis on discrete response models and censored data models. Different types of spatial effects and corresponding ways to address them are then discussed. In general, when the spatial variation is of major concern, geographically weighted regression is preferred. When the spatial dependency is the primary interest, spatial filtering and spatial regression should be chosen. Techniques popularly used to estimate spatial limited variable models, including maximum simulated likelihood estimation, composite marginal likelihood estimation, and Bayesian approach, are also introduced and briefly compared.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselin L (2003) Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers, and spatial econometrics. Int Reg Sci Rev 26(2):153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson PM, German SE, Sear DA, Clark MJ (2003) Exploring the relations between riverbank erosion and geomorphological controls using geographically weighted logistic regression. Geogr Anal 35(1):58–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beron KJ, Vijverberg WPM (1999) Probit in a spatial context: a Monte Carlo analysis. In: Anselin L, Florax R, Rey S (eds) Advances in spatial econometrics, methodology, tools and applications. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 169–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat CR (2011) The maximum approximated composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimation of multinomial probit-based unordered response choice models. Transp Res: Part B 45(7):923–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dray S, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR (2006) Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecol Model 196(3–4):483–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugundji E, Walker J (2005) Discrete choice with social and spatial network interdependencies: an empirical example using mixed generalized extreme value models with field and panel effects. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 1921(1):70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferdous N, Bhat CR (2012) Spatial panel ordered-response model with application to the analysis of urban land use development intensity patterns. Working paper. The University of Texas at Austin. http://amonline.trb.org/1smqfv/1smqfv/1. Accessed 1 Mar 2012

  • Ferdous N, Pendyala R, Bhat C, Konduri K (2011) Modeling the influence of family, social context, and spatial proximity on use of nonmotorized transport mode. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 2230(1):111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotheringham S (2003) Geographically weighted regression: the analysis of spatially varying relationships. Wiley, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Getis A (1995) Spatial filtering in a regression framework: experiments on regional inequality, government expenditures, and urban crime. In: New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 172–188

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (2002) Econometric analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith DA (2000) Eigenfunction properties and approximations of selected incidence matrices employed in spatial analyses. Linear Algebra Appl 321(1–3):95–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klier T, McMillen DP (2008) Clustering of auto supplier plants in the U.S.: GMM spatial logit for large samples. J Bus Econ Stat 26(4):460–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage JP (1999) Applied econometrics using MATLAB, http://www.spatial-econometrics.com/html/mbook.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2012

  • LeSage JP, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luo J, Wei YHD (2009) Modeling spatial variations of urban growth patterns in Chinese cities: the case of Nanjing. Landscape Urban Plan 91(2):51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden D (1980) Econometric models for probabilistic choice among products. J Bus 53(3):S13–S29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillen DP (1995) Spatial effects in probit models: a Monte Carlo investigation. In: Anselin L, Florax R (eds) New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York, pp 189–228

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McMillen DP, McDonald JF (1999) Land use before zoning: the case of 1920’s Chicago. Reg Sci Urban Econ 29(4):473–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace RK, LeSage JP (2011) Fast simulated maximum likelihood estimation of the spatial probit model capable of handling large samples. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1966039. Accessed 15 Feb 2012

  • Paleti R, Bhat CR (2011) The composite marginal likelihood (CML) estimation of panel ordered-response models. Working paper. The University of Texas at Austin. http://www.caee.utexas.edu/prof/bhat/ABSTRACTS/CML_Paper_27July2010.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2012

  • Pinkse J, Slade ME (1998) Contracting in space: an application of spatial statistics to discrete-choice models. J Econometrics 85(1):125–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sener I, Bhat C (2011) Flexible spatial dependence structures for unordered multinomial choice models: formulation and application to teenagers’ activity participation. Transportation 39(13):657–683

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith TE, LeSage JP (2004) A Bayesian probit model with spatial dependencies. In: Pace RK, LeSage JP (eds) Advances in econometrics: spatial and spatiotemporal econometric, vol 18. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 127–160

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Train K (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Varin C (2008) On composite marginal likelihoods. AStA Adv Stat Anal 92(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijverberg WPM (1997) Monte Carlo evaluation of multivariate normal probabilities. J Econometrics 76(1–2):281–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Kockelman K (2008) Maximum simulated likelihood estimation with correlated observations: a comparison of simulation techniques. In: Sloboda B (ed) Transportation statistics. J.D Ross Publishing, Fort Lauderdale, pp 173–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Kockelman K (2009) Bayesian inference for ordered response data with a dynamic spatial-ordered probit model. J Reg Sci 49(5):877–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Kockelman K, Lemp J (2012) The dynamic spatial multinomial probit model: analysis of land use change using parcel-level data. J Transp Geogr 24:77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaokun (Cara) Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Wang, X.(. (2014). Limited and Censored Dependent Variable Models. In: Fischer, M., Nijkamp, P. (eds) Handbook of Regional Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9_92

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9_92

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23429-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23430-9

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics