Abstract
Commensurate valuation of market and nonmarket public goods allows for a more valid benefit-cost analysis. Economic methods for valuing nonmarket public goods include actual behavior-based revealed preference methods such as the hedonic property method for urban-suburban public goods and travel cost-based models for outdoor recreation. For valuing proposed public goods for which there is no current behavior or valuing the existence or passive use values of public goods, economists can rely upon stated preference methods. While there is skepticism among some economists for relying upon what people say they will pay rather than what their actual behavior suggests they will pay, there is general acceptance of stated preference methods. These stated preference methods include the well-known contingent valuation method and choice experiments (sometimes called conjoint analysis). Lastly, in situations where there is neither time nor money to conduct an original revealed or stated preference study, economists typically rely upon benefit transfers from existing revealed preference and stated preference studies to provide rough estimates of the values of public goods such as water quality, air quality, wetlands, recreation, and endangered species.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdullah S, Markandya A, Nunes P (2011) Introduction to economic valuation methods. Chapter 5. In: Batabyal A, Nijkamp P (eds) Research tools in natural resource and environmental economics. World Scientific, Hackensack, pp 143–188
Alberini A, Kahn J (2006) Handbook on contingent valuation. Edward Elgar, Northampton
Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer, Norwell
Arrow K, Solow R, Portney P, Leamer E, Radner R, Schuman H (1993) Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Fed Reg 58(10):4602–4614
Bergstrom J, Taylor L (2006) Using meta-analysis for benefits transfer: theory and practice. Ecol Econ 60(2):351–360
Boyle K (2003) Contingent valuation in practice. In: Champ PA, Boyle KJ, Brown TC (eds) A primer on nonmarket valuation. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 111–170
Brookshire D, d’Arge R, Schulze W, Thayer M (1982) Valuing public goods: a comparison of the survey and hedonic approaches. Am Econ Rev 72(1):165–177
Cameron T (1992) Combining contingent valuation and travel cost data for the valuation of nonmarket goods. Land Econ 68(4):302–317
Carson R, Flores N, Martin K, Wright J (1996) Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods. Land Econ 72(1):113–128
Carson R, Mitchell R, Hanemann M, Kopp R, Presser S, Ruud P (2003) Contingent valuation and lost passive value: damages from the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Environ Res Econ 25(2):257–286
Champ P, Brown T, McCollum D (1997) Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods. J Environ Econ Manage 33(1):151–162
Creel M, Loomis J (1990) Theoretical and empirical advantages of truncated count data estimators for analysis of deer hunting in California. Am J Agri Econ 72(2):434–441
Diamond P, Hausman J (1994) Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number? J Econ Perspect 8(4):45–64
Freeman M (2003) The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods, 2nd edn. Resources for the Future Press, Washington, DC
Haab T, McConnell K (2002) Valuing environmental and natural resources: the econometrics of non-market valuation. Edward Elgar, Northampton
Hanemann M (1984) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. Am J Agric Econ 66(3):332–341
Hanemann M (1994) Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. J Econ Perspect 8(4):19–43
Herriges J, Kling C (eds) (1999) Valuing recreation and the environment: revealed preference methods in theory and practice. Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA
Holmes T, Adamowciz W (2003) Attribute-based methods. In: Champ P, Boyle K, Brown T (eds) A primer on nonmarket valuation. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 171–220
Krutilla J (1967) Conservation reconsidered. Am Econ Rev 57(4):777–786
Loomis J (1996) Measuring the economic benefits of removing dams and restoring the Elwha river: results of a contingent valuation survey. Water Resource Res 32(2):441–447
Loomis J, Yorizane S, Larson D (2000) Testing significance of multi-destination and multi-purpose trip effects in a travel cost method demand model for whale watching trips. Agr Resource Econ Rev 29(2):183–191
Loomis J (2005) Updated outdoor recreation use values on national forests and other public lands. General technical report PNW-GTR-658. Pacific Northwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Portland
Loomis J (2011) What’s to know about hypothetical bias in stated preference valuation studies. J Econ Survey 25(2):363–370
Louviere J, Hensher D, Swait J (2001) Stated choice methods: analysis and applications in marketing, transportation and environmental valuation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Mueller J, Loomis J (2008) Spatial dependence in Hedonic property models: do different corrections result in economically significant differences in estimated implicit prices. J Agric Res Econ 33(2):212–231
Nelson J, Kennedy P (2009) The use (and abuse) of meta-analysis in environmental and natural resource economics: an assessment. Environ Res Econ 42(3):345–377
Parsons G (2003) The travel cost method. In: Champ P, Boyle K, Brown T (eds) A primer on nonmarket valuation. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 269–330
Portney P (1994) The contingent valuation debate: why economists should care. J Econ Perspect 8(4):3–17
Rolfe J, Bennett J (2006) Choice modelling and the transfer of environmental values. Edward Elgar, Northampton
Rosenberger R, Loomis J (2003) Benefit Transfer. In: Champ P, Boyle K, Brown T (eds) A primer on nonmarket valuation. Kluwer, Boston, pp 445–482
Taylor L (2003) The Hedonic method. In: Champ P, Boyle K, Brown T (eds) A primer on nonmarket valuation. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 331–394
U.S. District Court of Appeals (for the District of Columbia). State of Ohio vs. U.S. Department of Interior (1989) Case number 86–15755. July 14, 1989
Walsh R, Loomis J, Gillman R (1984) Valuing option, existence and bequest demands for wilderness. Land Econ 60(1):14–29
Whitehead J, Haab T, Huang J-C (2011) Preference data for environmental valuation: combining revealed and stated approaches. Routledge, New York
Wilson M, Hoehn J (2006) Valuing environmental goods and services using benefit transfer: the state-of-the-art and science. Ecol Econ 60(2):335–342
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Loomis, J.B. (2014). Economic Valuation: Concepts and Empirical Methods. In: Fischer, M., Nijkamp, P. (eds) Handbook of Regional Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9_54
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9_54
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23429-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23430-9
eBook Packages: Business and Economics