Skip to main content

Charity, Defined in Comparative, Cross-Cultural Perspective

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
International Encyclopedia of Civil Society
  • 26 Accesses

Synonyms

Beneficence; Dāna; Huvaršhta; Liberality; Philanthropy; Rén; Tzedakah; Zakāt

Definition

In his Inquiry into the principles of morals, David Hume observes:

The epithets, sociable, good-natured, humane, merciful, grateful, friendly, generous, beneficent, or their equivalents, are known in all languages, and universally express the highest merit which human nature is capable of attaining. § II “Of Benevolence.” (1854, vol. IV, p. 237)

By whatever we choose to name it, charity has been a ubiquitous feature of human society throughout human history. Indeed, contemporary conceptions of charity in civil society are deeply rooted in historical traditions that have decisively informed their normative basis (Salamon and Anheier 1998, pp. 226–231). This entry therefore traces the historical origin and development of “charity” through the various epithets by which it has been known in the world’s major cultural and religious traditions.

Introduction: The Origins of Charity in Human Nature

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bowman, W. (2010). Philanthropy and religion, christianity. In: Anheier, H., Toepler, S., & List, R. (Eds.) The international encyclopedia of civil society (pp. 1162–1166). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-93996-4.

  • Bstan-‘dzin-rgya-mtsho. (2011). Beyond religion: Ethics for a whole world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, F. L. (1958). The Oxford dictionary of the Christian Church. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, S. (1956). Roman society: From Nero to Marcus Aurelius. New York: Meridian Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donin, H. (1972). To be a Jew: A guide to Jewish observance in contemporary life; selected and compiled from the Shulhan Arukh and Responsa literature and providing a rationale for the laws and the traditions. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frolovskiy, D. (2019, January 25). China’s philanthropy boom. The Diplomat. 50. Washington, DC: Trans-Asia, Inc. thediplomat.com/2019/01/chinas-philanthropy-boom/

  • Gershevitch, I. (1959). The Avestan hymn to Mithra: With an introduction, translation and commentary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goren-Inbar, N., Alperson, N., Kislev, M. E., Simchoni, O., Melamed, Y., Ben-Nun, A., & Werker, E. (2004). Evidence of hominin control of fire at Gesher Benot Ya’aqov, Israel. Science, 304, 725–727. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1095443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gribble, D. (1999). Alcibiades and Athens. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guruge, A. N. P., & Bond, G. D. (1998). Generosity and service in Theravāda Buddhism. In W. F. Ilchman, S. N. Katz, & E. L. Queen (Eds.), Philanthropy in the world’s traditions (pp. 79–96). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammack, D. C. (1998). Making the nonprofit sector in the United States: A reader. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. W. (1927). The terminology of “gratitude” in Greek. Classical Philology, 22(2), 142–161. https://doi.org/10.1086/360883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, M. (2015). Challenges of conducting disaster research: The case of the Sichuan earthquake. Risk, Hazards and Crisis in Public Policy, 6(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/rhc3.12080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humbach, H. (1984). A Western approach to Zarathushtra. Bombay: Government Fellowship Lectures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humbach, H. (1991). The Gāthās of Zarathushtra: And the other old Avestan texts. Heidelberg: C. Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1854). The philosophical works of David Hume. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, K. (1949). Vom Ursprung und Ziel der Geschichte. München: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. (1969). History of the law of charity, 1532–1827. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kawamura, L. S. (1998). The Mahāyāna Buddhist foundation for philanthropic practices. In W. F. Ilchman, S. N. Katz, & E. L. Queen (Eds.), Philanthropy in the world’s traditions (pp. 97–106). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, A. (2013). The shape of ancient thought. München: Schirmer-Mosel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyokai, B. D. (1966). The teaching of Buddha. Tokyo: Toppan Printing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laumakis, S. J. (2008). The life of Siddhattha Gotama. In: An introduction to Buddhist philosophy (Cambridge introductions to philosophy) (pp. 3–18). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leaky, R. (1995). The origin of humankind. London: Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, M., Tao, R., & Su, F. (2019). Bringing politics back in charitable giving: Evidence from donations after China’s Sichuan earthquake. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764019868848.

  • Mauss, M. (1990 [1st Publ. 1950]). The gift: The form and reason for exchange in Archaic societies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mencius, & Lau, D. C. (2004). Mencius. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, J., & Breeze, B. (2016). The logic of charity: Great expectations in hard times. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, A. C. (2018). The Analects of Confucius 論語. Resources for East Asian Language and Thought. http://www.acmuller.net/con-dao/analects.html

  • Narten, J. (1982). Die Ameṣ̌a Speṇtas im Avesta. Wiesbaden: O. Harrassowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicole, J. (1906). Les papyrus de Genève, Transcripts et Publiés: Papyrus Grecs, Actes et Lettres, Tables du Vol. 1. Genève: Kündig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G. (1997). The university: from Ancient Greece to the 20th century. Palmerston North, N.Z.: Dunmore Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penslar, D. J. (1998). The origins of modern Jewish philanthropy. In W. F. Ilchman, S. N. Katz, & E. L. Queen (Eds.), Philanthropy in the world’s traditions (pp. 197–214). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polano, H. (1884). The Talmud: Selections from the contents of that ancient book. Also, brief sketches of the men who made and commented upon it. London: Frederick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, G. B. (1999). Mending bodies, saving souls: A history of hospitals. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the non-profit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas, 9(3), 213–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01398736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, H. E. (1989, June 13). In China, “a little blood”, op-ed piece, New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. (2010). Göbekli Tepe – The Stone Age Sanctuaries: New results of ongoing excavations with a special focus on sculptures and high reliefs. Documenta Praehistorica, XXXVII, 239–256. https://doi.org/10.4312/dp.37.21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. F. H. (1998). Chinese philanthropy as seen through a case of famine relief in the 1640s. In W. F. Ilchman, S. N. Katz, & E. L. Queen (Eds.), Philanthropy in the world’s traditions (pp. 133–168). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulek, M. (2022). Recovering the wisdom of Protagoras: A re-interpretation of the Prometheia trilogy. In J. Dunn & R. Meier (Eds.), A new politics for philosophy: Essays on Plato, Nietzsche, and Strauss. Washington, DC: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2018, September 6). Why do people in China give so little to charity?. London: Economist Newspaper Ltd. economist.com/china/2018/09/06/why-do-people-in-china-give-so-little-to-charity

  • The Guardian. (2010, September 8). Charitable giving by country: Who is the most generous?. London: Guardian Publications. https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/sep/08/charitable-giving-country

  • Veyne, P., & Murray, O. (1992). Bread and circuses: Historical sociology and political pluralism. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zulfiqar, M. (2011). Zakah: According to the Quran & Sunnah. Riyadh: Darussalam.

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Anderson, L. (1998). Contextualizing philanthropy in South Asia: A textual analysis of Sanskrit sources. In W. F. Ilchman, S. N. Katz, & E. L. Queen (Eds.), Philanthropy in the world’s traditions (pp. 57–78). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. (2002). Poverty and leadership in the later Roman Empire. Hanover: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confucius, & Muller, A. C. (2008). The Analects. http://www.acmuller.net/con-dao/analects.html

  • Constantelos, D. J. (1968). Byzantine philanthropy and social welfare. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creel, H. G. (1970). What is Taoism? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, R. T. H. (2008). The Rig Veda: Complete. New York: Forgotten Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesiod, & West, M. L. (1996). Works & days. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesiod, & West, M. L. (1997). Theogony. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrington, C. (1999). The poetic Edda. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, K. (1998). The apostolic fathers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, J., & Müller, F. M. (1879). The sacred books of China. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, H. G., & Metzger, B. M. (1977). The new Oxford annotated Bible with the Apocrypha: Revised standard version, containing the second edition of the New Testament and an expanded edition of the Apocrypha. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mencius, & Lau, D. C. (2004). Mencius. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickthall, M. (1986). The holy Qur’an. Lahore: Qudrat Ullah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, K. (2006). The nonprofit sector in historical perspective: Traditions of philanthropy in the West. In: The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., 13–31). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronan, P., & Schneider, G. (2009). Multi-verbal expressions of “giving” in old English and old Irish. http://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/24606/2/CLfinalV.pdf

  • Sanjay, A. (2010). Daan and other giving traditions in India: The forgotten pot of gold. New Delhi: AccountAid India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. P. (1987). Private religious foundations in the Byzantine Empire. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, B. (1968). Complete works of Chuang Tzu. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, A., & Huan, A. C. (1975). Tao: The watercourse way. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuangzi, L., & Legge, J. (1891). The sacred books of China: The texts of Taoism (trans: Legge, J.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marty Sulek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Sulek, M. (2023). Charity, Defined in Comparative, Cross-Cultural Perspective. In: List, R.A., Anheier, H.K., Toepler, S. (eds) International Encyclopedia of Civil Society. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99675-2_9528-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99675-2_9528-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99675-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99675-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics