Skip to main content

Online Communities

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
International Encyclopedia of Civil Society
  • 122 Accesses

Definition

An Internet-based social network in which people engage in social discourse, display affect, and build relationships. Together, these activities constitute a resource that allows people to take action. Online communities may be formal nonprofit organizations or informal organizations. Whether formal or informal, online communities enable people to participate in civil society and engage civically in public life.

Introduction

From Community to Online Community

To understand online communities, one must first understand the concept of community generally. While scholars in different disciplines at different points in time have defined and redefined community, the German sociologist Ferdinand Tönnies (2001[1887]) provided a famous, and brief, definition. Tönnies drew a distinction between a society, or a loose association (Gesellschaft, in German) based primarily on self-interest, individualism, and weak social ties on the one hand, and community (or Gemeinschaft, in German),...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Berry, M., & Chenoweth, E. (2018). In D. Meyer & S. Tarrow (Eds.), The resistance: The dawn of the anti-Trump opposition movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of social capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–260). Westport: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, L. (2004). Citizen organizing in cyberspace: Lessons from health care and implications for public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(4), 384–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, L., Boland, K., & McNutt, J. (2018). The advent of technology enhanced leaderless transnational social movement organizations: Implications for transnational advocacy. In J. McNutt (Ed.), Technology, activism, & social justice in a digital age. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayko, M. (2014). Techno-social life: The internet, digital technology, and social connectedness. Sociology Compass, 8(7), 976–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chenoweth, E., & Pressman, J. (2017). This is what we learned by counting womens’ marches. Washington Post. February 7, 2017. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/02/07/this-is-what-we-learned-by-counting-the-womens-marches/?utm_term=.0eff80903eac. Accessed on 23 April 2019.

  • Edlins, M., & Brainard, L. (2016). Pursuing the promises of social media? Changes in adoption and usage of social media by the top 10 police departments. Information Polity, 21, 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, W. (1984). Neuromancer. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruzd, A., Jacobson, J., Wellman, B., & Mai, P. (2016). Understanding communities in and age of social media: The good the bad, the complicated. Information, Communication & Society, 19(9), 1187–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, K., & Hughes, J. (1998). Cyberpolitics: Citizen activism in the age of the Internet. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, W., & Roberts, M. (2018). How sudden censorship can increase access to information. American Political Science Review, 112(3), 621–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalathil, S., & Boas, T. (2003). Open networks, closed regimes: The impact of the Internet on authoritarian rule. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loury, G. (1977). A dynamic theory of racial income differences. In P. Wallace & A. Le Mund (Eds.), Women, minorities and employment discrimination. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loury, G. (1987). Why should we care about group inequality? Social Philosophy and Policy, 5, 249–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainie, L., & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier (Revised Edition). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonnies, F. (2001[1887]). Community and civil society (Jose Harris, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevisan, F. (2016). Disability rights advocacy online: Voice, empowerment, and global cconnectivity. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2017). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Justice, Office of the Special Counsel. (2019). Report on the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1999). Virtual communities as communities: Net surfers don’t ride alone. In A. M. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 167–194). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., & Haythornthwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lori A. Brainard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Brainard, L.A. (2020). Online Communities. In: List, R., Anheier, H., Toepler, S. (eds) International Encyclopedia of Civil Society. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99675-2_43-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99675-2_43-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99675-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99675-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics