Definition
The word “advocacy” derives from the Latin ad vocare – “to speak to,” in other words to argue for a particular position. Initially coined for legal professionals (advocates) who argue for one side or the other in a dispute, in recent decades the term has become increasingly associated with groups of citizens who argue for a particular position, or set of positions, on a given issue.
While individuals, political lobbyists, and lawyers can conduct advocacy to advance their points of view, civil society organizations have become increasingly prominent in influencing the policies and programs of governments, corporations, and other institutions. These CSOs may primarily exist for other purposes, with their advocacy being ancillary to these purposes. For example, professional associations and consumer associations primarily exist to provide services, support, and advice to their members but may also advocate policies and actions that would benefit those members. And many...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Accountable Now. (2018). 12 accountability commitments. Berlin: Accountable Now.
Amnesty International. (2019). Laws designed to silence: The global crackdown on civil society organisations. London: Amnesty International.
Arugay, A. (2012). Tracking textbooks for transparency: Improving accountability in education in the Philippines. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
Bhargava, V., & Raha, S. (2015). Citizen engagement and social accountability approaches in enhancing integrity of conditional cash transfer programs. Washington, DC: Partnership for Transparency Fund.
Cardoso Panel. (2004). Report of the panel of eminent persons on UN–civil society relations, and “UN system and civil society: An inventory and analysis of practice.” Background paper for the panel, prepared by its secretariat. United Nations, from www.un.org/reform/panel.htm
Carothers, T., & Brechenmacher, S. (2014). Accountability, transparency, participation and inclusion: A new development consensus? Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Carothers, T., & Youngs, R. (2015). The complexities of global protests. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Castells, M. (Mar., 2008). The new public sphere: Global civil society, communication networks, and global governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 78–93.
Clark, J. (2003a). Worlds apart: Civil society and the battle for ethical globalization. Bloomfield/London: Kumarian Press/Earthscan.
Clark, J. (Ed.). (2003b). Globalizing civic engagement: Civil society and trans-national action. London: Earthscan.
Clark, J., & Themudo, N. (2006). Linking the web and the street: Internet-based “dot-causes” and the “anti-globalization” movement. World Development, 34(1), 50–74.
Florini, A. (Ed.). (2000). The third force: The rise of transnational civil society. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Fox, J. (2016). Scaling accountability through vertically integrated civil society policy monitoring and advocacy. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
Global Witness. (2018). At what cost. London: Global Witness.
Goldman, P. (2008). Change the world (in five easy steps). Financial Times Magazine, May 17.
Held, D. (2002). Cosmopolitanism and globalization. Logos, 1(3), 1–17.
International Center for Not-for-Profit Law. (various years). Global trends in NGO law. Washington, DC: International Center for Not-for-Profit Law.
Lindenberg, M., & Dobel, P. (1999). Globalization and northern NGOs: The challenge of relief and development in a changing context. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(4), 4–24.
Mathews, J. (1997). Power shift. Foreign Affairs, 76(1), 50–66.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Secrett, C. (1996). Why do pressure groups matter? Friends of the Earth. Paper for the Social Market Foundation (June), London.
Further Reading
Edwards, M., & Gaventa, J. (Eds.). (2001). Global citizen action. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Gray, J., Lämmerhirt, D., & Bounegru, L. (2016). Changing what counts: How can citizen-generated and civil society data be used as an advocacy tool to change official data collection? Johannesburg: Data-Shift, CIVICUS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Clark, J.D. (2020). Advocacy. In: List, R., Anheier, H., Toepler, S. (eds) International Encyclopedia of Civil Society. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99675-2_145-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99675-2_145-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99675-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99675-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences