Abstract
Creative inconclusiveness is a state of uncertainty in a creative process, one in which multiple possibilities are still open for exploration. Inconclusiveness is not an accident, rather it is a fundamental part of the creativity phenomenon that is not captured by the standard definition of creativity, but that is covered by the dynamic definition of creativity, within the theoretical dynamic creativity framework. Creativity requires going beyond the boundaries of existing knowledge to explore untested possibilities, irrespective of the fact that in doing so one might or might not be awarded a creative achievement. Intrinsic and extrinsic causes for creative inconclusiveness are discussed, as well as the conceptual extension of inconclusiveness, uncertainty, and possibility to the dynamic universal creativity process. It is shown how the response of the creative actor(s) to states of creative inconclusiveness is crucial, with highly creative individuals able to extract positive energy from the ensuing frustration, whereas those with low creativity abandon. Six eminent examples of geniuses who experienced very significant inconclusiveness are discussed: Edison, Marconi, Jobs, Lamarck, Van Gogh, and Leonardo. Indications for future research activities on the subject of creative inconclusiveness are provided.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Agnoli, S., Franchin, L., Rubaltelli, E., & Corazza, G. E. (2019). The emotionally intelligent use of attention and affective arousal under creative frustration and creative success. Personality and Individual Differences, 142, 242–248.
Brower, R. (1999). Vincent van Gogh. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 2, p. 686). San Diego: Academic.
Corazza, G. E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258–267.
Corazza, G. E. (2019). The dynamic universal creativity process. In R. A. Beghetto & G. E. Corazza (Eds.), Dynamic perspectives on creativity: New directions for theory, research, and practice in education. New York: Springer.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. London: Murray.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1.
Petrides, K. V. (2009). Psychometric properties of the trait emotional intelligence questionnaire. In C. Stough, D. H. Saklofske, & J. D. Parker (Eds.), Advances in the assessment of emotional intelligence. New York: Springer.
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal., 24, 92–96.
Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology, 36, 311–322.
Wang, Y., Liu, H., & Sun, Z. (2017). Lamarck rises from his grave: Parental environment-induced epigenetic inheritance in model organisms and humans. Biological Reviews, 92(4), 2084–2111.
Wills, I. (2007). Instrumentalizing failure: Edison’s invention of the carbon microphone. Annals of Science, 64, 383–409.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Corazza, G.E. (2021). Creative Inconclusiveness. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_61-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_61-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences