Skip to main content

Aesthetics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 257 Accesses

Abstract

Aesthetics is a philosophical discipline whose modern roots can be traced back to the first half of the eighteenth century, when Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten thus named the “science of sensible knowledge,” forming a noun out of the Greek adjective aisthetike. He focused on the problem of sensation, recognizing that Aesthetics much be considered as its own specific field of inquiry whose laws can be recognized and, indeed, described (Baumgarten, Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus. Halae Magdeburgicae: Litteris Ioannis Henrici Grunerti, acad. Typogr, 1735; Baumgarten, Aesthetica. G. Olms, Hildesheim, 1750). Aesthetics is thus caught between philosophy, poetics, and rhetoric, which had to work hard to find its own independent location. The discipline’s relative youth does not mean, however, that one can ignore its basis in classical philosophy, with which it has always been in dialogue from the eighteenth century onward. The great issues of Aesthetics, especially its reflection on theories of beauty, are rooted in classical thought, finding a full conceptual formulation and vocabulary in the Enlightenment, while augmenting reflection on creative processes within the arts and processes of reception. Through categories such as beauty, ugliness, the sublime, and kitsch, Aesthetics must come face to face today with a form of art whose borders are increasingly blurry and accept the disciplinary challenges laid down by neuro-aesthetics and technological hyper-realism, which are reanimating classical problems and terminology. Without being absorbed into new disciplinary and cultural horizons, contemporary Aesthetics is producing its own original standpoint, using its own conceptual tools to shed light on the new challenges that art, its creation, and enjoyment force us to confront.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Batteux, C. (1747). Les beaux-arts réduits à un même principe. Paris: Durand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1995). Le crime parfait. Paris: Galilée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarten A. G. (1735). Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus. Halae Magdeburgicae: Litteris Ioannis Henrici Grunerti, acad. Typogr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgarten, A. G. (1750). Aesthetica. Hildesheim: G. Olms. 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, H. (1979). Schiffbruch mit Zuschauer: Paradigma einer Daseinsmetapher. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, E. (2013). The sublime in modern philosophy: Aesthetics, ethics, and nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. (1757). A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful. Oxford: Blackwell. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2016). Neuroscience of aesthetics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 136(9), 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danto, A. (2003). The abuse of beauty: Aesthetics and the concept of art. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickie, G. (1974). Art and the Aestethic: An institutional analysis. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diderot, D. (1751). Lettre sur les sourds et muets. Genève: E. Droz, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfles, G. (1972). Il Kitsch. Antologia del cattivo gusto. Milano: Mazzotta. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bos, J.-B. (1719). Réflexions critiques sur la poésie et sur la peinture. London: J. Nourse. 1748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, A. (1774). An essay on genius. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag. 1966.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, C. (1939). Avant-Garde and Kitsch. Partisan Review, New York, VI(5), 34–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1835). Aesthetics. Lectures on fine art (2 Vols). Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1757). Of the standard of taste. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1790). Critique of the power of judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leder, H. (2013). Next steps in neuroaesthetics: Which processes and processing stages to study. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzocut-Mis, M. (2012). How far can we go? Pain, excess and the obscene. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menninghaus, W. (2003). Disgust: The theory and history of a strong sensation. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moles, A. (1971). Psychologie du kitsch: l’art du bonheur. Paris: Denoël-Gonthier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montesquieu, C. L. d. S. d. (1757). Essai sur le goût. Paris: Payot & Rivages. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkranz, K. (1853). Ästhetik des Hässlichen. Königsberg: Verlag der Gebrüder Vornträger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, F. W. J. (1796–1805). Philosophie der Kunst und weitere Schriften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, A. (2009). Art and negative affect. Philosophy Compass, 4(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maddalena Mazzocut-Mis .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Mazzocut-Mis, M. (2020). Aesthetics. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_146-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_146-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics