Abstract
Aesthetics is a philosophical discipline whose modern roots can be traced back to the first half of the eighteenth century, when Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten thus named the “science of sensible knowledge,” forming a noun out of the Greek adjective aisthetike. He focused on the problem of sensation, recognizing that Aesthetics much be considered as its own specific field of inquiry whose laws can be recognized and, indeed, described (Baumgarten, Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus. Halae Magdeburgicae: Litteris Ioannis Henrici Grunerti, acad. Typogr, 1735; Baumgarten, Aesthetica. G. Olms, Hildesheim, 1750). Aesthetics is thus caught between philosophy, poetics, and rhetoric, which had to work hard to find its own independent location. The discipline’s relative youth does not mean, however, that one can ignore its basis in classical philosophy, with which it has always been in dialogue from the eighteenth century onward. The great issues of Aesthetics, especially its reflection on theories of beauty, are rooted in classical thought, finding a full conceptual formulation and vocabulary in the Enlightenment, while augmenting reflection on creative processes within the arts and processes of reception. Through categories such as beauty, ugliness, the sublime, and kitsch, Aesthetics must come face to face today with a form of art whose borders are increasingly blurry and accept the disciplinary challenges laid down by neuro-aesthetics and technological hyper-realism, which are reanimating classical problems and terminology. Without being absorbed into new disciplinary and cultural horizons, contemporary Aesthetics is producing its own original standpoint, using its own conceptual tools to shed light on the new challenges that art, its creation, and enjoyment force us to confront.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Batteux, C. (1747). Les beaux-arts réduits à un même principe. Paris: Durand.
Baudrillard, J. (1995). Le crime parfait. Paris: Galilée.
Baumgarten A. G. (1735). Meditationes philosophicae de nonnullis ad poema pertinentibus. Halae Magdeburgicae: Litteris Ioannis Henrici Grunerti, acad. Typogr.
Baumgarten, A. G. (1750). Aesthetica. Hildesheim: G. Olms. 1961.
Blumenberg, H. (1979). Schiffbruch mit Zuschauer: Paradigma einer Daseinsmetapher. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Brady, E. (2013). The sublime in modern philosophy: Aesthetics, ethics, and nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burke, E. (1757). A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas of the sublime and beautiful. Oxford: Blackwell. 1990.
Chatterjee, A., & Vartanian, O. (2016). Neuroscience of aesthetics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 136(9), 172–194.
Danto, A. (2003). The abuse of beauty: Aesthetics and the concept of art. Chicago: Open Court.
Dickie, G. (1974). Art and the Aestethic: An institutional analysis. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Diderot, D. (1751). Lettre sur les sourds et muets. Genève: E. Droz, 1965.
Dorfles, G. (1972). Il Kitsch. Antologia del cattivo gusto. Milano: Mazzotta. 2000.
Du Bos, J.-B. (1719). Réflexions critiques sur la poésie et sur la peinture. London: J. Nourse. 1748.
Gerard, A. (1774). An essay on genius. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag. 1966.
Greenberg, C. (1939). Avant-Garde and Kitsch. Partisan Review, New York, VI(5), 34–49.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1835). Aesthetics. Lectures on fine art (2 Vols). Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1975.
Hume, D. (1757). Of the standard of taste. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill. 1965.
Kant, I. (1790). Critique of the power of judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2000.
Leder, H. (2013). Next steps in neuroaesthetics: Which processes and processing stages to study. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 27–37.
Mazzocut-Mis, M. (2012). How far can we go? Pain, excess and the obscene. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Pub.
Menninghaus, W. (2003). Disgust: The theory and history of a strong sensation. Albany: SUNY Press.
Moles, A. (1971). Psychologie du kitsch: l’art du bonheur. Paris: Denoël-Gonthier.
Montesquieu, C. L. d. S. d. (1757). Essai sur le goût. Paris: Payot & Rivages. 1993.
Rosenkranz, K. (1853). Ästhetik des Hässlichen. Königsberg: Verlag der Gebrüder Vornträger.
Schelling, F. W. J. (1796–1805). Philosophie der Kunst und weitere Schriften. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog. 2018.
Smuts, A. (2009). Art and negative affect. Philosophy Compass, 4(1), 39–55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Mazzocut-Mis, M. (2020). Aesthetics. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_146-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_146-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-98390-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences