Zero Hunger

2020 Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökçin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Nutrient Use Efficiency for Food Security, Sustainable Development, and Resilience

  • Barbara SawickaEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95675-6_34
  • 9 Downloads

Definition

The nutrient use efficiency (NUE) is a measure of how well plants use available mineral nutrients. This is a very complex feature that depends on the ability to absorb nutrients from the soil, their transport, storage, mobilization, use in the plant, as well as in the environment.

Introduction

The nutrient use efficiency (NUE) can be defined as the output per unit of effort. In agriculture, it is usually associated with the introduction of fertilizers, while in the scientific literature, the NUE is often expressed as a fresh mass or product yield per nutrient content. Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is a term used to indicate the ratio between the amount of fertilizer N removed from the field by the crop and the amount of fertilizer N applied. NUE can be described as efficiency (biomass) per unit (fertilizers, nutrient content). NUE is an important factor contributing to the control of plant growth rate and yield. The same level of nutrients may cause an increase or decrease...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abbasian A, Ahmadi A, Abbasi AR, Darvishi B (2018) Effect of various phosphorus and calcium concentrations on potato seed tuber production. J Plant Nutr 41(14):1765–1777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agegnehu G, Nelson PN, Bird MI, van Beek C (2015) Phosphorus response and fertilizer recommendations for wheat grown on nitisols in the central Ethiopian highlands. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 46(19):2411–2424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvarado-Camarillo D, Valdez-Aguilar LA, Castillo-González AM, Trejo-Téllez LI, Martínez-Amador SY (2018) Biomass, nitrogen and potassium dynamics in hydroponic rose production. Acta Agric Scand sekcja B Soil Plant Sci 68(8):719–726.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2018.1473481
  4. Anonymous (2018) Biofortification: the nutrition revolution is now. www.harvestplus.org
  5. Baligar VC, Fageria NK (2015) Nutrient use efficiency in plants: an overview. Chapter 1. Nutrient use efficiency: from basics to advances, pp 1–14. Part of book: Nutrient use efficiency: from basics to advances. 10.1007/978-81-322-2169-2_1. Springer, New Delhi. ISBN: 978-81-322-2168-5Google Scholar
  6. Banijamali SM, Feizian M, Bayat H, Mirzaei S (2018) Effects of nitrogen forms and calcium amounts on growth and elemental concentration in Rosa hybrida cv ‘Vendentta’. J Plant Nutr 41(9):1205–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barben SA, Hopkins BG, Von Jolley D, Webb BL, Nichols BA, Buxton EA (2011) The association of zinc, manganese and phosphorus and their effect on iron and copper in a chelator-buffered solution grown Russet Burbank potato. J Nutr Plant 34(8):1144–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barłóg P (2016) Diagnosis of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) nutrient imbalance by DRIS and CND-clr methods at two stages during early growth. J Plant Nutr 39(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barreto MTL, Magalhães AG, Rolim MM, Pedrosa EMR, de Duarte AMS, Tavares UE (2014) Desenvolvimentoe acúmulo de macronutrientes em plantas de milho biofertilizadas com manipueira. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 18(5):487–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brentrup F (2004) Methodological contribution to adjusting the life cycle assessment to the specifics of crop production. In: 4th International conference on life cycle assessment in the agri-food sector, October 6–8, 2003 in Horsens, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  11. Brentrup F, Palliere C. (2017) Nitrogen use efficiency as an AgroEnvironmental indicator. http://www.oecd.org/tad/sustainable-agriculture/44810433.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2018
  12. Brentrup FJ, Küsters J, Lammel PB, Kuhlmann H (2004) Investigation of the environmental impact of agricultural crop production using the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. Part II: application of the LCA methodology to investigate the environmental impact of different N fertilizer rates in cereal production. Euro J Agronomy 20:265–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cartmill AD, Cartmill DL, Alarcón A (2014) Controlled release fertilizer increased phytoremediation of sandy soil contaminated with oil. Int J Phytoremediation 16(3):285–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chhuneja P, Kaur S, Garg T, Ghai M, Kaur S, Prashar M, Bains NS, Goel RK, Keller B, Dhaliwal HS, Singh K (2008) Mapping of adult plant stripe rust resistance gene in diploid a genome wheat species and their transfer to bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet 116:313–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R (2008) The zinc finger network of plants. Cell Mol Life Sci 65(7–8):1150–1160.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-007-7473-4
  16. Coetzee PE, Ceronio GM, du Preez CC (2017) Effect of phosphorus and nitrogen sources on essential nutrient concentration and uptake by maize (Zea mays L) during early growth and development. South Afr J Plant Soil 34(1):55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Colangelo EP, Guerinot ML (2006) Put the metal to the petal: metal uptake and transport throughout plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:322–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Curie C, Panaviene Z, Loulergue C, Dellaporta SL, Briat J, Walker EL (2001) Maize yellow strip1 encodes a membrane protein directly involved in Fe(III) uptake. Nature 409:346–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dechen R, Carmello QAC, Monteiro FA, Nogueirol RC (2015) Role of magnesium in food production: an overview. Crop Pasture Sci 66(12):1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Oliveira AA, Mori SA (1999) A Central Amazonian terra firme forest. I. High tree species richness on poor soils. Biodivers Conserv 8:1219–1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duncan EG, Maher WA, Jagtap R, Krikowa F, Roper MM, O’Sullivan CA (2017) Speciation of selenium in wheat grain changes in the presence of nitrogen and sulfur fertilizers. Environ Geochem Health 39(4):955–966.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-016-9857-6
  22. Duncan EG, O’Sullivan CA, Roper MM, Biggs JS, Peoples MB (2018) Influence of co-application of nitrogen with phosphorus, potassium and sulphur on the apparent efficiency of nitrogen fertiliser use, grain yield and protein content of wheat: review. Field Crop Res 226:56–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. EU Nitrogen Expert Panel (2015) Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) – an indicator for the utilization of nitrogen in agriculture and food systems. Wageningen University, Alterra, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  24. Fageria VD (2006) Nutrient interactions in crop plants. J Plant Nutr 24(8):1269–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. FAO (2018) International Food Data Systems Network (INFOODS). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2018. http://www.fao.org/search/en/
  26. Farzadfar S, Zarinkamar F, Hojati M (2017) Magnesium and manganese affect photosynthesis, essential oil composition and phenolic compounds of Tanacetum parthenium. Plant Physiol Biochem 112:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gil BDB, Reidsma P, Giller K, Todman L, Whitmore A, van Ittersum M (2018) Sustainable development goal 2: improved targets and indicators for agriculture and food security. Perspective. Ambio 48:685.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1101-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Graham RD, Humphries JM, Kitchen JL (2000) Nutritionally enhanced cereals: a sustainable foundation for a balanced diet. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 9(Supplement):S91–S96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gregorio GB, Senadhira D, Htut H, Graham RD (2000) Breeding for trace mineral density in rice. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 21(4):382–386.  https://doi.org/10.1177/156482650002100407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grzebisz W, Gransee A, Szczepaniak W, Diatta J (2013) The effects of potassium fertilization on water-use efficiency in crop plants. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 176(3):355–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Guala SD, Vega FA, Covelo EF (2010) The dynamics of heavy metals in plant–soil interactions. Ecol Model 221:1148–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gunes AN, Alpaslan M, Inal A (1998) Critical concentrations of nutrients as well as antagonistic and synergistic relationships between nutrients of young tomatoes cultivated NFT. J Nutr Plant 21:10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hawkesford M, Kopriva S, De Kok LJ (2014) Effectiveness of nutrient utilization in plants – concepts and approaches. Springer. ISBN: 978-3-319-10634-2.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10635-9
  34. Hell R, Stephan UW (2003) Iron uptake, trafficking and homeostasis in plants. Planta 216(4):541–551.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-002-0920-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Horta MC, Torrent J (2010) Dinâmica do fósforo no solo. Perspectiva agronómica e ambiental. Castelo Branco, Portugal, Edições IPCB, 97 pp. (in Portugal)Google Scholar
  36. Hussain S, Maqsood MA, Rengel Z, Aziz T (2012) Biofortification and estimated human bioavailability of zinc in wheat grains as influenced by methods of zinc application. Plant Soil 361(1–2):279–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jakobsen ST (1993) Between plant nutrients: IV between calcium and phosphate. Acta Agric Scand Sec B 43(1):12Google Scholar
  38. Johnston AE, Poulton PR (2009) Nitrogen in agriculture: an overview and definitions of nitrogen use efficiency. In: Proceedings, International Fertiliser Society, vol 651, YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Karray-Bouraoui N, Attia H, Maghzaoui M, Msilini N, Rabhi M, Lachaâl M (2010) Physiological responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to the of iron deficiency and nitrogen form. Acta Biol Hung 61(2):204–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kobayashi T, Itai RN, Aung MS, Senoura T, Nakanishi H, Nishizawa NK (2012) The rice transcription factor IDEF1 directly binds to iron and other divalent metals for sensing cellular iron status. Plant J 69:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Komanicka E, Helmisaari H-S, Hartman M, Nieminen TM (2013) Effect of mulching on uptake of copper and nickel from smelter-polluted-soil by planted tree seedlings. Open J Air Pollut 2:56–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kováčik J, Klejdus B, Štork F, Hedbavny J (2011) Nitrate deficiency reduces cadmium and nickel accumulation in chamomile plants. J Agric Food Chem 59:5139–5149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leonel GM (2017) Yield and nutritional requirements of cassava in response to potassium fertilizer in the second cycle. J Plant Nutr 40(20):2785–2796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lin H, Kalanick T, Wang E (2014) System and method for providing dynamic supply positioning for on-demand services. http://www.freshpatents.com/-dt20140109ptan20140011522.php
  45. Lošák T, Hlušek J, Lampartová I, Mühlbachová G, Čermák P (2017) Changes in the soil magnesium and sulphur content after kieserite application into haplic Luvisol and the effect on yields of barley biomass. Acta Univ Agric Silviculturae Mendelianae Brun 65(4):1225–1229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Luna M, Grunfeld L, Mukherjee T, Sandler B, Copperman AB (2010) Moderately elevated levels of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in young patients predict low ovarian response, but should not be used to disqualify patients from attempting in vitro fertilization. Ferti Steril 87(4):782–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ma BL, Zheng Z (2018) Nutrient uptake of iron, zinc, magnesium, and copper in transgenic maize (Zea mays) as affected by rotation systems and N application rates. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 112(1):27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-018-9925-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marin M, Valdez-Aguilar LA, Castillo-Gonzalez AM, Pineda-Pineda J, Luna JJG (2010) Modeling growth and ion concentration of lilium in response to nitrogen: potassium: calcium mixture solutions. J Plant Nutr 34(1):12–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Murata Y, Itoh Y, Iwashita T, Namba K (2015) Transgenic petunia with the iron (III) phytosiderophore transporter gene acquires tolerance to iron deficiency to alkaline environments. Plos One (3):e0120227.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.012022
  50. Neves AC, Bergamini CN, de Leonardo RO, Gonçalves MP, Zenatti DC, Hermes E (2017) Effect of biofertilizer obtained by anaerobic digestion of cassava effluent on the development of crambe plants. Rev Bras Engenharia Agrícola e Ambient 21(10):681–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nichols SN, Hofmann RW, Williams WM, Crush JR (2014) Nutrient responses and macronutrient composition of some Trifolium repens, Trifolium uniflorum interspecific hybrids. Crop Pasture Sci 65(4):370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Niu Y, Jin G, Li X, Tang C, Zhang Y, Liang Y, Yu J (2015) Phosphorus and magnesium interactively modulate the elongation and directional growth of primary roots in Arabidopsis thaliana (L) Heynh. J Exp Bot 66(13):3841–3854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. North KA, Ehlting B, Koprivova A, Rennenberg H, Kopriva S (2009) Natural variability of Arabidopsis adaptation to growth under low nitrogen conditions. Plant Physiol Biochem 47:912–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. OECD (2008) Environmental performance of agriculture in OECD countries since 1990, Paris. www.oecd.org/tad/env/indicators. Accessed 02 03 2018
  55. Pal S, Singh HB, Farooqui A, Rakshit A (2015) Fungal biofertilizers in Indian agriculture: perception, demand and promotion. J Eco-friendly Agric 10(2):101–113Google Scholar
  56. Parra-Coronado A, Fischer G, Camacho-Tamayo JH (2015) Development and quality of pineapple guava fruit in two locations with different altitudes in Cundinamarca, Colombia. Bragantia 74(3):359–366. Instituto Agronômico de Campinas Campinas, Brasil. ISSN: 0006-8705Google Scholar
  57. Peleg Z, Cakmak I, Ozturk L, Yazici A, Jun Y, Budak H, Korol AB, Fahima T, Saranga Y (2009) Quantitative trait loci conferring grain mineral nutrient concentrations in durum wheat x wild emmer wheat RIL population. Theor Appl Genet 119(2):353–369.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-009-1044-z. EpubCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rawat N, Eelam K, Tiwari VK, Dhaliwal AHS (2015) Biofortification of cereals to overcome hidden hunger. Rev Plant Breed 132:437–445.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr12040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reddy PS, Reddy BVS, Kumar AA, Ramesh S, Sahrawat KL, Ra PV (2010) Association of Grain Fe and Zn Contents with agronomic traits in Sorghum. Indian J Plant Genet Resour 23(3):280–284Google Scholar
  60. Reich MAN, van den Meerakker M, Parmar S, Hawkesford MJ, De Kok LJ, Grantz D (2016) Temperature determines size and direction of effects of elevated CO2 and nitrogen form on yield quantity and quality of Chinese cabbage. Plant Biol 18:63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rietra RPJJ, Heinen M, Dimkpa CO, Bindraban PS (2017) Effects of antagonist nutrients and synergism on yields and fertilizer use efficiency. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 48(16):1895–1920.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2017.140742
  62. Salunke R, Neelam K, Rawat N et al (2011) The bioavailability of iron from wheat Aegilops derivatives selected for their high iron and protein content. J Agric Food Chem 59(16):9048.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf202913eCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sawicka B, Kalembasa D (2008) Variability in macroelement content in tubers of Helianthus tuberosus L at different nitrogen fertilization levels. Acta Sci Pol Agricultura 7(1):67–82Google Scholar
  64. Sawicka B, Michałek W, Pszczółkowski P (2015) The relationship of potato tubers chemical composition with selected physiological indicators. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 102(1):41–50.  https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a2015102005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sawicka B, Barbaś P, Skiba D (2016a) Fluctuations of sodium, copper, zinc, iron and manganese in potato tubers in the organic and integrated production system. J Elem 21(1).  https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2015.20.2.865
  66. Sawicka B, Noaema AH, Hameed TS, Skiba D (2016b) Genotype and environmental variability of chemical elements in potato tubers. Acta Sci Pol Agric 15(3):79–91. ISSN 1644-0625m ISSN 2300-8504 (online), www.agricultura.acta.utp.edu.pl
  67. Scanlan CA, Brennan RF, D’Antuono MF, Sarre GA (2017) The between soil pH and phosphorus for wheat yield and the impact of lime-induced changes to soil aluminium and potassium. Soil Res 55(4):341–353.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SR16274
  68. Seiler GJ, Campbell LG (2004) Genetic variability for mineral element concentrations of wild Jerusalem artichoke forage. Crop Sci 44:289–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shahrivar FS, Khademi H (2018) Effect of gypsum on potassium and iron release from phlogopite to alfalfa. J Plant Nutr 41(4):509–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Souza GA, Hart JJ, Carvalho JG, Rutzke MA, Albrecht JC, Guilherme LGG, Kochian LV, Li L (2014) Genotypic variation of zinc and selenium concentration in grains of Brazilian wheat lines. Plant Sci 224:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stevens CJ, Dise NB, Mountford JO, Gowing DJ (2004) Impact of nitrogen deposition on the species richness of grasslands. Science 303:1876–1879.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.109467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sullivan O (2017) Selenium speciation in wheat grain varies in the presence of nitrogen and sulphur fertilisers. Environ Geochem Health 39(4):955–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Szydełko-Rabska E, Kulczycki G, Sowiński J (2014) Impact of different forms of nitrogen fertilizer on the content and uptake of microelements in sorghum. J Elem 567–576.  https://doi.org/10.5601/jelem2014192647
  74. Takahashi K, Preetz H, Igel J (2011) Soil properties and performance of landmine detection by metal detector and ground-penetrating radar — soil characterisation and its verification by a field test. J Appl Geophys 73:368–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tiwari C, Wallwork H, Kumar U, Dhari R, Arun B, Mishra VK, Reynolds MP, Joshi AK (2013) Molecular mapping of high temperature tolerance in bread wheat adapted to the Eastern Gangetic plain of India. Field Crop Res 154:201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. UN (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  77. Van Lanschot Kempen NV (2018) 2018 Corporate social responsibility supplement, p 32. https://www.vanlanschotkempen.com/media/3473/2018-csrsupplement-van-lanschot-kempen.pdf
  78. Watts-Williams SJ, Cavagnaro TR (2014) Nutrient interactions and arbuscular mycorrhizas: a meta-analysis of a mycorrhiza-defective mutant and wild-type tomato genotype pair. Plant Soil 384(1–2):79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. WHO (2015) Dietary recommendations/Nutritional requirements. http://www.who.int/nutrition/. Accessed 24 July 2018
  80. Wyszkowski M, Wyszkowska J, Ziołkowska A (2004) Effect of soil contamination with diesel oil on yellow lupine yield and macroelements content. Plant Soil Environ 5(1):218–226Google Scholar
  81. Zhao G, Liu Y, Tian Y, Sun Y, Cao Y (2010) Preparation and properties of macromolecular slow-release fertilizer containing nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. J Polym Res 17(1):119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Żołnowski C (2013) Studies on the variability of the yield and quality features of table potato (Solanum tuberosum L) grown under varied levels of mineral fertilization. University of Warmia and Mazury, Dissertations and Monographs 191, pp 259. ISBN 978-83-7299-832-3 [in polish]Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plant Production Technology and Commodities Science, Faculty of AgrobioengineeringUniversity of Life Sciences in LublinLublinPoland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Mohammad Sadegh Allahyari
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural ManagementRasht Branch, Islamic Azad UniversityRashtIran