Zero Hunger

2020 Edition
| Editors: Walter Leal Filho, Anabela Marisa Azul, Luciana Brandli, Pinar Gökçin Özuyar, Tony Wall

Equitable Food Distribution and Sustainable Development

  • Maria José Palma Lampreia Dos-SantosEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95675-6_11
  • 1 Downloads

Definition

Equitable Food Distribution (EFD) means producing, processing, and distributing food in a timely way to ensure food security for the entire population by the safe and healthy food access to all segments of the population on sustainable conditions from production to the global distribution. This phenomenon could occur in situation of crisis and emergency and also in poor regions with a strong deficit to access to secure and health foods. In both situations contributes to the malnutrition and/or hunger with strong negative impacts in the health of populations where vulnerable people are most affected.

Introduction

Food is fundamental to human wellbeing, and human development is central to achieving food security. Yet despite global food production over the past half century keeping ahead of global demand, around one billion people today do not have enough to eat, and a further billion lack adequate nutrition (Misselhorn et al. 2012; Pinstrup-Andersen 2009). This situation...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Balcik B, Beamon BM (2008) Facility location in humanitarian relief. Int J Logist 11(2):101–121Google Scholar
  2. Batty M, Axhausen KW, Giannotti F, Pozdnoukhov A, Bazzani A, Wachowicz M, Portugali Y (2012) Smart cities of the future. Eur Phys J Spec Top 214(1):481–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CARR S (2019) Applying best practices from humanitarian aid to evaluate corporate social responsibility. The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility: Psychological and Organizational Perspectives, 48Google Scholar
  4. Çelik M, Ergun Ö, Johnson B, Keskinocak P, Lorca Á, Pekgün P, Swann J (2012) Humanitarian logistics. In New directions in informatics, optimization, logistics, and production (pp 18–49)Google Scholar
  5. COST FA1305 (2015) Memorandum of understanding. Retrieved 13 Oct 2015, from: http://www.cost.eu/COSTActions/fa/FA1305
  6. Dos Santos MJPL (2016) Smart cities and urban areas – Aquaponics as innovative urban agriculture. Urban For Urban Green 20:402–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dos Santos MJPL (2017) Typologies of farms from European Union. Rev Agro Amb 10(2):273–290. abr./jun. 2017 – ISSN 1981-9951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dos Santos MJPL (2018) Nowcasting and forecasting aquaponics by Google Trends in European countries. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 134:178–185Google Scholar
  9. Dos Santos MJPL (2019) Sustainable and commercial development of aquaponics through the certification in Europe. Ecocycles 5(2):12–18.  https://doi.org/10.19040/ecocycles.v5i2.140
  10. Dos Santos MJP, Diz H (2019) Towards sustainability in european agricultural firms. Adv Intell Syst Comput 783:161–168Google Scholar
  11. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO (2017) The state of food security and nutrition in the world. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i7695e.pdf
  12. Fianu S, Davis LB (2018) A Markov decision process model for equitable distribution of supplies under uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 264(3):1101–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goddek S, Delaide B, Mankasingh U, Ragnarsdottir K, Jijakli H, Thorarinsdottir R (2015) Challenges of sustainable and commercial aquaponics. Sustainability 7(4):4199–4224Google Scholar
  14. Goddek S, Joyce A, Kotzen B, Dos-Santos M (2019) Aquaponics and global food challenges. In Aquaponics Food Production Systems (pp. 3–17). Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  15. Kourtit K, Nijkamp P, Arribas D (2012) Smart cities in perspective – a comparative European study by means of self-organizing maps. Innov Eur J Soc Sci Res 25(2):229–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krugman P (1998) What’s new about the new economic geography? Oxf Rev Econ Policy 14(2):7–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marsh MT, Schilling DA (1994) Equity measurement in facility location analysis: a review and framework. Eur J Oper Res 74(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mary S, Mishra AK (2020) Humanitarian food aid and civil conflict. World Development 126:104713Google Scholar
  19. Matacena R (2016) Linking alternative food networks and urban food policy: a step forward in the transition towards a sustainable and equitable food system? Int Rev Soc Res 6(1):49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mazumdar R, Mason L, Douligeris C (1991) Fairness in network optimal flow control: optimality of product forms. IEEE Trans Commun 39(5):775–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meng Q, Yang H (2002) Benefit distribution and equity in road network design. Transp Res 36:19–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Misselhorn A, Aggarwal P, Ericksen P, Gregory P, Horn-Phathanothai L, Ingram J, Wiebe K (2012) A vision for attaining food security. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4(1):7–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ogryczak W (2007) Multicriteria models for fair resource allocation. Control Cybern 36(2):303–332Google Scholar
  24. Orgut IS, Ivy J, Uzsoy R, Wilson JR (2016) Modeling for the equitable and effective distribution of donated food under capacity constraints. IIE Trans 48(3):252–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pinstrup-Andersen P (2009) Food security: definition and measurement. Food Sec 1:5–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tabuchi T (2014) Historical trends of agglomeration to the capital region and neweconomic geography. Reg Sci Urban Econ 44:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. United Nations-UN (2019) Sustainable development goals. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-consumption-production/
  28. Vossen T, Ball M, Hoffman R (2003) A general approach to equity in traffic flow management and its application to mitigating exemption bias in ground delay programs. Air Traffic Control Q 11:277–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Woolf SH (2017) Progress in achieving health equity requires attention to root causes. Health Aff 36(6):984–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Centro de Estudos sobre a Mudança Socioeconómica e o Território (DINÂMIA-CET), Escola Superior de Comunicação Social, Instituto Politécnico de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Section editors and affiliations

  • Mohammad Sadegh Allahyari
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural ManagementRasht Branch, Islamic Azad UniversityRashtIran